Araştırma Makalesi

Stent placement after flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal stones can improve stone-free rate on final follow-up: A retrospective single center study

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2 20 Temmuz 2018
PDF İndir
EN TR

Stent placement after flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal stones can improve stone-free rate on final follow-up: A retrospective single center study

Abstract

Aim: Although the advantage of ureteral double j (D/J) stenting has been shown in reducing post- operative pain after ureteroscopic surgery, its contribution to stone clearance for additional treatment has not been fully assessed. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effect of stenting on stone free rates at the end of the additional treatment.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) for kidney stones between October 2009 and January 2015. Patients with malignant ureteral stricture, severe skeletal malformation, renal unit malformation, non-opaque renal stone or lost to follow-up were excluded. 47 of 289 patients (stenting 24 patients, non-stenting 23 patients) assessed. The perioperative and postoperative parameters and stone-free rates were compared in patients whether they had intraoperative D/J stent (group 1) or not (group 2).

Results: No differences were found between groups according to age, gender, body mass index, operation history, preoperative stenting history, shockwave lithotripsy history, ureteral stricture, stone size, access sheath rate, retreatment, or additional treatment number and stone location. Operation time was significantly higher in group 1. Those who refused additional treatment were insignificantly lower in group 1. Although the stone-free rates were similar for the two groups at the end of the first month, the stone-free rates after the additional treatments were significantly higher in group 1.

Conclusion: Stenting during FURS, improved the stone-free rate on final follow-up, if residual stones remain.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Pengfei S, Yutao L, Jie Y, Wuran W, Yi D, Hao Z, et al. The results of ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2011;186:1904-9.
  2. 17. Shen P, Jiang M, Yang J, Li X, Li Y, Wei W. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol. 2011;186:1328-35.
  3. 16. Mogilevkin Y, Sofer M, Margel D, Greenstein A, Lifshitz D. Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. J Endourol. 2014;28:1414-17.
  4. 15. Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ. Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology. 2012;80:1214-19.
  5. 14. Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S, Shore DM, Nadler RB. Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol. 2007;21:1277-80.
  6. 13. Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A, Plothe KD, Thelen P, Ringert RH, et al. Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol. 2013;3:855-9.
  7. 12. Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD. Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol. 2011;25:751-4.
  8. 11. Jones BJ, Ryan PC, Lyons O, Grainger R, McDermott TE, Butler MR. Use of the double pigtail stent in stone retrieval following unsuccessful ureteroscopy. Br J Urol. 1990;66:254-56.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Cerrahi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hakan Kılıçarslan * Bu kişi benim
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Temmuz 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Nisan 2018

Kabul Tarihi

19 Haziran 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.Onur Kaygısız, Gökhun Özmerdiven, Kadir Ömür Günseren, Hakan Kılıçarslan. Stent placement after flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal stones can improve stone-free rate on final follow-up: A retrospective single center study. Arch Clin Exp Med. 01 Temmuz 2018;3(2):67-70. doi:10.25000/acem.415835