Araştırma Makalesi

An effective minimal invasive method in pilonidal sinus surgery: Sinusotomy

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 1 Aralık 2019
PDF İndir
TR EN

An effective minimal invasive method in pilonidal sinus surgery: Sinusotomy

Abstract

Aim: Pilonidal sinus is a common disease. Postoperative pain, limitation of movement, return to daily routine and recurrence are major problems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of patients operated with sinusotomy for pilonidal sinus disease.       

Methods: This study was performed retrospectively between 2016 and 2019 in patients treated with sinusotomy for pilonidal sinus disease. Data of 83 patients who underwent sinusotomy were reviewed with hospital records. Age, sex, symptom duration, pit count, operation time, postoperative 2nd day VAS pain score and recurrence rates were evaluated.

Results: 78 (94%) patients were male and 5 (6%) were female. The mean age was 26.6 (15-42) years and the mean symptom duration was 4.6 (1-20) months. Mean pit count was 3.2 (1-13), mean operative time was 9.1(5-21) minutes, mean VAS pain score was 0.6 (0-2) on the second day. Mean healing time was 4.01 (2-11) weeks. Recurrence was observed in 2 patients (2.4%).

Conclusion: Sinusotomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive method that may be used in pilonidal sinus surgery. However, comparative prospective studies with other techniques are needed.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Kose E, Hasbahceci M, Tonyali H, Karagulle M. Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017,93:82-7.
  2. 2. Velotti N, Manlgrasso M, Lauro KD, Aralmo E, Calculli F, Vertaldi S, et al. Minimally invasive pilonidal sinus treatment: A narrative review. Open Med. 2019;532-6.
  3. 3. Alvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Ann Coloproctol 2019 May 22. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.27
  4. 4. Kartal A, Aydin HO, Oduncu M, Ferhatoglu MF, Kivilcim T, Filiz AI. Comparison of three surgical techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. Prague Med Rep. 2018;4:148-55.
  5. 5. Karaca T, Yoldaş O, Bilgin BC, Ozer S, Yoldaş S, Karaca NG. Comparison of short-term results of modified Karydakis flap and modified Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus surgery. Int J Surg. 2012;10:601-6.
  6. 6. OliveiraAI, Barasso C, Osorio A, Pinto JC. Minimally invasive surgical treatment of pilonidal disease: Mid-term retrospective analysis of a single center. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:1-6.
  7. 7. Bessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:491-8.
  8. 8. Rabie ME, Refeidi AA, Haizaee A, Hilal S, Ajmi H, Amri AA. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: sinotomy versus excisional surgery, a retrospective study. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:177-80.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Cerrahi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Aralık 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Ekim 2019

Kabul Tarihi

7 Kasım 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.Önder Karabay. An effective minimal invasive method in pilonidal sinus surgery: Sinusotomy. Arch Clin Exp Med. 01 Aralık 2019;4(3):138-41. doi:10.25000/acem.633313