Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments

Yıl 2024, , 260 - 273, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1567382

Öz

In Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) environments, forming a group is essential for the success of the learning process. Furthermore, several studies on forming groups in CSCL environments have been conducted recently to form ones that promote learners’ engagement and collaboration among their members. Forming group-based approaches requires data on learners’ actions (or traces) during the learning process. In this study, behavioral traces of learners are used to form groups. In other words, we used a clustering algorithm based on learners’ behavioral engagement to form homogeneous groups of learners. The learners must have different levels of engagement within each group to enhance their engagement and cognitive levels. The basis of the proposed grouping algorithm is a set of indicators of learners’ engagement. Furthermore, the proposed approach is based on an artificial intelligence algorithm, the k-means clustering method, which is used to find the maximum possibilities for the best clusters. Then, another algorithm is applied to obtain groups of learners with different levels of behavioral engagement. The validation of the proposed approach on a dataset containing behavioral traces from 100 learners was encouraging and promoting.

Kaynakça

  • Abnar, S., Orooji, F., & Taghiyareh, F. (2012, January). An evolutionary algorithm for forming mixed groups of learners in web based collaborative learning environments. In the IEEE international conference on technology enhanced education (ICTEE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
  • Amara, S., Macedo, J., Bendella, F., & Santos, A. (2016). Group formation in mobile computer-supported collaborative learning contexts: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 258-273. google scholar
  • Anzieu, D., & Martin, J. Y. (1971). La dynamique des groupes restreints. Presses univ. de France. google scholar
  • Atherton, M., Shah, M., Vazquez, J., Griffiths, Z., Jackson, B., & Burgess, C. (2017). Using learning analytics to assess student engagement and academic outcomes in open access enabling programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(2), 119-136. google scholar
  • Bekele, R. (2005). Computer-assisted learner group formation based on personality traits (Doctoral dissertation, Staats-und Universitatsbiblio-thek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky). google scholar
  • Bouyzem, M., AL Meriouh, Y., & Moustakim, O. (2021). Le e-learning a l’universite Abdelmalek Essaâdi: Une analyse descriptive du point de vue des enseignants. Revue Economie, Gestion et Societe, 1 (32). google scholar
  • Chen, B., Chang, Y. H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21-30. google scholar
  • Christodoulopoulos, C. E., & Papanikolaou, K. A. (2007, October). A group formation tool in an e-learning context. In 19th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI 2007) (Vol. 2, pp. 117-123). IEEE google scholar
  • Cole, E., Mac Aodha, O., Lorieul, T., Perona, P., Morris, D., & Jojic, N. (2021). Multi-label learning from single positive labels. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 933-942). google scholar
  • Combaudon, S. (2018). MySQL 5.7: administracion y optimizacion. Ediciones Eni. google scholar
  • Da Rocha, H. (2019). Learn Chart. js: Create interactive visualizations for the web with chart. js 2. Packt Publishing, Ltd. google scholar
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. google scholar
  • Indira, B., Valarmathi, K., & Devaraj, D. (2019). An approach to enhance packet classification performance of software-defined network using deep learning. Soft Computing, 23, 8609-8619. google scholar
  • Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S., Capeli, O. M., Isotani, N., De Albuquerque, A. R., ... & Jaques, P. (2013). A Semantic Web-based authoring tool to facilitate the planning of collaborative learning scenarios compliant with learning theories. Computers & Education, 63, 267-284.b google scholar
  • Jozan, M. M. B., & Taghiyareh, F. (2013). An evolutionary algorithm for homogeneous grouping to enhance web-based collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer Science Research and Application, 3(1), 74-85. google scholar
  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2022). Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 449-460. google scholar
  • Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., Dillenbourg, P., & Kanselaar, G. (2002). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL. Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands. google scholar
  • Maqtary, N., Mohsen, A., & Bechkoum, K. (2019). Group formation techniques in computer-supported collaborative learning: A systematic literature review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 169-190. google scholar
  • Matazi, I., Messoussi, R., & Bennane, A. (2014, May). The design of an intelligent multi-agent system for supporting collaborative learning. In the 9th International conference on intelligent systems: Theories and applications (SITA-14) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. google scholar
  • Mujkanovic, A., Lowe, D., Willey, K., & Guetl, C. (2012, June). Unsupervised learning algorithm for adaptive group formation: Collaborative learning support in remotely accessible laboratories. In International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2012) (pp. 50-57). IEEE. google scholar
  • O’Donnell, K., & Reschly, A. L. (2020). Assessment of student engagement. In A. L. Reschly, A. J. Pohl, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school (pp. 55-76). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_3. google scholar
  • Ounnas, A., Davis, H. C., & Millard, D. E. (2007). Semantic modeling for group formation. Workshop on Personalisation in E-Learning Environments at Individual and Group Level (PING) at the 11th International Conference on User Modeling UM2007, Corfu, Greece. google scholar
  • Ouyang, F., Chen, S., & Li, X. (2021). Effect of three network visualizations on students’ social-cognitive engagement in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2242-2262. google scholar
  • Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623-2656. google scholar
  • Reschly, A. L., Pohl, A., Christenson, S. L., & Appleton, J. J. (2017). Engaging adolescents in secondary schools. School Mental Health Services for Adolescents, 45-77. google scholar
  • Resta, P., & Laferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65-83. google scholar
  • Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 43-102. google scholar
  • Srba, I., & Bielikova, M. (2014). Dynamic group formation as an approach to collaborative learning support. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(2), 173-186. google scholar
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Aprendizaje Colaborativo apoyado por computador: Una perspectiva historica. G. Stahl, T. Koschmann, & D. Suthers, Aprendizaje Colaborativo apoyado por computador: Una perspectiva historica.(pag. 426). Cambridge: RK Sawyer. google scholar
  • Zheng, Y., Li, C., Liu, S., &Lu, W. (2018). An improved genetic approach for composing optimal collaborative learning groups. Knowledge-Based Systems, 139, 214-225. google scholar
  • Zhou, L., Zheng, X., Yang, D., Wang, Y., Bai, X., & Ye, X. (2021). Application of multi-label classification models for the diagnosis of diabetic complications. BMC Med Inform Decis., 21(1), 182. google scholar
Yıl 2024, , 260 - 273, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1567382

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abnar, S., Orooji, F., & Taghiyareh, F. (2012, January). An evolutionary algorithm for forming mixed groups of learners in web based collaborative learning environments. In the IEEE international conference on technology enhanced education (ICTEE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
  • Amara, S., Macedo, J., Bendella, F., & Santos, A. (2016). Group formation in mobile computer-supported collaborative learning contexts: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 258-273. google scholar
  • Anzieu, D., & Martin, J. Y. (1971). La dynamique des groupes restreints. Presses univ. de France. google scholar
  • Atherton, M., Shah, M., Vazquez, J., Griffiths, Z., Jackson, B., & Burgess, C. (2017). Using learning analytics to assess student engagement and academic outcomes in open access enabling programmes. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 32(2), 119-136. google scholar
  • Bekele, R. (2005). Computer-assisted learner group formation based on personality traits (Doctoral dissertation, Staats-und Universitatsbiblio-thek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky). google scholar
  • Bouyzem, M., AL Meriouh, Y., & Moustakim, O. (2021). Le e-learning a l’universite Abdelmalek Essaâdi: Une analyse descriptive du point de vue des enseignants. Revue Economie, Gestion et Societe, 1 (32). google scholar
  • Chen, B., Chang, Y. H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21-30. google scholar
  • Christodoulopoulos, C. E., & Papanikolaou, K. A. (2007, October). A group formation tool in an e-learning context. In 19th IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI 2007) (Vol. 2, pp. 117-123). IEEE google scholar
  • Cole, E., Mac Aodha, O., Lorieul, T., Perona, P., Morris, D., & Jojic, N. (2021). Multi-label learning from single positive labels. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 933-942). google scholar
  • Combaudon, S. (2018). MySQL 5.7: administracion y optimizacion. Ediciones Eni. google scholar
  • Da Rocha, H. (2019). Learn Chart. js: Create interactive visualizations for the web with chart. js 2. Packt Publishing, Ltd. google scholar
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. google scholar
  • Indira, B., Valarmathi, K., & Devaraj, D. (2019). An approach to enhance packet classification performance of software-defined network using deep learning. Soft Computing, 23, 8609-8619. google scholar
  • Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R., Isotani, S., Capeli, O. M., Isotani, N., De Albuquerque, A. R., ... & Jaques, P. (2013). A Semantic Web-based authoring tool to facilitate the planning of collaborative learning scenarios compliant with learning theories. Computers & Education, 63, 267-284.b google scholar
  • Jozan, M. M. B., & Taghiyareh, F. (2013). An evolutionary algorithm for homogeneous grouping to enhance web-based collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer Science Research and Application, 3(1), 74-85. google scholar
  • Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2022). Learning analytics intervention improves students’ engagement in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(2), 449-460. google scholar
  • Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., Dillenbourg, P., & Kanselaar, G. (2002). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL. Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands. google scholar
  • Maqtary, N., Mohsen, A., & Bechkoum, K. (2019). Group formation techniques in computer-supported collaborative learning: A systematic literature review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 169-190. google scholar
  • Matazi, I., Messoussi, R., & Bennane, A. (2014, May). The design of an intelligent multi-agent system for supporting collaborative learning. In the 9th International conference on intelligent systems: Theories and applications (SITA-14) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. google scholar
  • Mujkanovic, A., Lowe, D., Willey, K., & Guetl, C. (2012, June). Unsupervised learning algorithm for adaptive group formation: Collaborative learning support in remotely accessible laboratories. In International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2012) (pp. 50-57). IEEE. google scholar
  • O’Donnell, K., & Reschly, A. L. (2020). Assessment of student engagement. In A. L. Reschly, A. J. Pohl, & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Student engagement: Effective academic, behavioral, cognitive, and affective interventions at school (pp. 55-76). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37285-9_3. google scholar
  • Ounnas, A., Davis, H. C., & Millard, D. E. (2007). Semantic modeling for group formation. Workshop on Personalisation in E-Learning Environments at Individual and Group Level (PING) at the 11th International Conference on User Modeling UM2007, Corfu, Greece. google scholar
  • Ouyang, F., Chen, S., & Li, X. (2021). Effect of three network visualizations on students’ social-cognitive engagement in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2242-2262. google scholar
  • Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623-2656. google scholar
  • Reschly, A. L., Pohl, A., Christenson, S. L., & Appleton, J. J. (2017). Engaging adolescents in secondary schools. School Mental Health Services for Adolescents, 45-77. google scholar
  • Resta, P., & Laferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 65-83. google scholar
  • Scheuer, O., Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010). Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5, 43-102. google scholar
  • Srba, I., & Bielikova, M. (2014). Dynamic group formation as an approach to collaborative learning support. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(2), 173-186. google scholar
  • Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Aprendizaje Colaborativo apoyado por computador: Una perspectiva historica. G. Stahl, T. Koschmann, & D. Suthers, Aprendizaje Colaborativo apoyado por computador: Una perspectiva historica.(pag. 426). Cambridge: RK Sawyer. google scholar
  • Zheng, Y., Li, C., Liu, S., &Lu, W. (2018). An improved genetic approach for composing optimal collaborative learning groups. Knowledge-Based Systems, 139, 214-225. google scholar
  • Zhou, L., Zheng, X., Yang, D., Wang, Y., Bai, X., & Ye, X. (2021). Application of multi-label classification models for the diagnosis of diabetic complications. BMC Med Inform Decis., 21(1), 182. google scholar
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Bilgi İşlem Eğitimi, İşbirlikçi ve Sosyal Bilgi İşleme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Souhila Zerdoudi 0000-0002-2982-1633

Houda Tadjer 0000-0001-7624-1343

Yacine Lafifi 0000-0001-8232-4196

Zohra Mehenaoui 0000-0002-6732-7839

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 23 Aralık 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024

Kaynak Göster

APA Zerdoudi, S., Tadjer, H., Lafifi, Y., Mehenaoui, Z. (2024). A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments. Acta Infologica, 8(2), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1567382
AMA Zerdoudi S, Tadjer H, Lafifi Y, Mehenaoui Z. A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments. ACIN. Aralık 2024;8(2):260-273. doi:10.26650/acin.1567382
Chicago Zerdoudi, Souhila, Houda Tadjer, Yacine Lafifi, ve Zohra Mehenaoui. “A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments”. Acta Infologica 8, sy. 2 (Aralık 2024): 260-73. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1567382.
EndNote Zerdoudi S, Tadjer H, Lafifi Y, Mehenaoui Z (01 Aralık 2024) A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments. Acta Infologica 8 2 260–273.
IEEE S. Zerdoudi, H. Tadjer, Y. Lafifi, ve Z. Mehenaoui, “A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments”, ACIN, c. 8, sy. 2, ss. 260–273, 2024, doi: 10.26650/acin.1567382.
ISNAD Zerdoudi, Souhila vd. “A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments”. Acta Infologica 8/2 (Aralık 2024), 260-273. https://doi.org/10.26650/acin.1567382.
JAMA Zerdoudi S, Tadjer H, Lafifi Y, Mehenaoui Z. A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments. ACIN. 2024;8:260–273.
MLA Zerdoudi, Souhila vd. “A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments”. Acta Infologica, c. 8, sy. 2, 2024, ss. 260-73, doi:10.26650/acin.1567382.
Vancouver Zerdoudi S, Tadjer H, Lafifi Y, Mehenaoui Z. A New Approach to Grouping Learners Based on Behavioral Engagement in CSCL Environments. ACIN. 2024;8(2):260-73.