Research Article

Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial

Volume: 4 Number: 2 March 29, 2022
EN

Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial

Abstract

Aim: Pain after thoracotomy is one of the most severe in clinical practice and more effective analgesia can be achieved by combining systemic and regional techniques. Though thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard in the treatment, its application can be restricted due to side effects and contraindications. We investigated the hypothesis that thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) reduced morphine consumption, pain scores, and side effects as much as TEA after thoracotomy. Material and Method: Fifty patients who underwent elective posterolateral thoracotomy were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups as TEA (group I, n = 25) and TPVB (group II, n = 25). Postoperative consumption of patient-controlled morphine, visual analog scores (VAS), hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were collected in 72 hours. Additionally, pulmonary function tests (PFT) values were recorded. Results: Postoperative VAS values during rest were comparable between the groups (p > 0.005) and they did not have significantly difference postoperative VAS values during coughing (p > 0.005). The cumulative morphine consumption was higher in Group 2 (p < 0.05). Side effects were comparable between the groups II (p > 0.05). Conclusion: We conclude that TEA provided more effective analgesia than TPVB in thoracotomy patients in the early postoperative period with comparable side effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Mesbah A, Yeung J, Gao F. Pain after thoracotomy. BJA Education 2016; 16: 1-7.
  2. Komatsu T, Sowa T, Takahashi K, Fujinaga T. Paravertebral block as a promising analgesic modality for managing post-thoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 20: 113-6.
  3. Júnior Ade P, Erdmann TR, Santos TV, et al. Comparison between continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: Systematic review. Braz J Anesthesiol 2013; 63: 433-42.
  4. Romero A, Garcia JE, Joshi GP. The state of the art in preventing postthoracotomy pain. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 25: 116-24.
  5. Thompson C, French DG, Costache I. Pain management within an enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10: 3773-80.
  6. Gerner P. Postthoracotomy pain management problems. Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 26: 355-67, vii.
  7. Yokoyama Y, Nakagomi T, Shikata D, Goto T. Combined analgesic treatment of epidural and paravertebral block after thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9: 1651-7.
  8. Chin JWE, Valchanov K. Pharmacological management of post-thoracotomy pain. Open Med J 2016; 3: 255-64.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 29, 2022

Submission Date

February 15, 2022

Acceptance Date

March 1, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 4 Number: 2

APA
Pehlivanoğlu, F., Tunç, M., Sazak, H., Pehlivanoğlu, P., Zengin, M., & Alagöz, A. (2022). Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 4(2), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1073507
AMA
1.Pehlivanoğlu F, Tunç M, Sazak H, Pehlivanoğlu P, Zengin M, Alagöz A. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022;4(2):179-184. doi:10.38053/acmj.1073507
Chicago
Pehlivanoğlu, Figen, Mehtap Tunç, Hilal Sazak, Polat Pehlivanoğlu, Musa Zengin, and Ali Alagöz. 2022. “Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Block and Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Management of Post Thoracotomy Pain: A Randomised Trial”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4 (2): 179-84. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1073507.
EndNote
Pehlivanoğlu F, Tunç M, Sazak H, Pehlivanoğlu P, Zengin M, Alagöz A (March 1, 2022) Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4 2 179–184.
IEEE
[1]F. Pehlivanoğlu, M. Tunç, H. Sazak, P. Pehlivanoğlu, M. Zengin, and A. Alagöz, “Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 179–184, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.38053/acmj.1073507.
ISNAD
Pehlivanoğlu, Figen - Tunç, Mehtap - Sazak, Hilal - Pehlivanoğlu, Polat - Zengin, Musa - Alagöz, Ali. “Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Block and Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Management of Post Thoracotomy Pain: A Randomised Trial”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 4/2 (March 1, 2022): 179-184. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1073507.
JAMA
1.Pehlivanoğlu F, Tunç M, Sazak H, Pehlivanoğlu P, Zengin M, Alagöz A. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022;4:179–184.
MLA
Pehlivanoğlu, Figen, et al. “Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural Block and Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Management of Post Thoracotomy Pain: A Randomised Trial”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. 2022, pp. 179-84, doi:10.38053/acmj.1073507.
Vancouver
1.Figen Pehlivanoğlu, Mehtap Tunç, Hilal Sazak, Polat Pehlivanoğlu, Musa Zengin, Ali Alagöz. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural block and continuous thoracic paravertebral block for management of post thoracotomy pain: a randomised trial. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2022 Mar. 1;4(2):179-84. doi:10.38053/acmj.1073507

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)