A new era in fundamentals of bone homeostasis: biocompatibility of bone mineral doped fluoride ions with osteoblast cells in the balance of calcium and phosphate metabolism

Abstract

Aim: The use of biocompatible bone tissue grafts, filling materials, bone minerals, and implants, particularly in medicine and dentistry studies, has expanded significantly in recent years, as have expectations from the materials. We aimed to test the biocompatibility and wound and tissue biocompatibility of many grafts and similar materials used in medicine and dentistry with tests such as cytotoxicity, scratch assay, cell adhesion, and hemolysis. Material and Method: In this study, the interaction of fluorine ions with a dental material was investigated by biological activity experiments. In addition, studies were carried out on important osteoblast cells for tissue regeneration control. For this process, cell migration analysis, which we do not encounter frequently in the literature, was used to examine the interaction of cells with biomaterials more sharply. Results: Flor ions do not create a cytotoxic effect and also increase the viability of osteoblasts which is important for tissue regeneration and are bone precursor cells. Conclusions: In this study, in which the efficiency of osteoblast cells was discussed, it was concluded that 2% fluorine added material had more effective biological results compared to the increase in fluorine ion ratio.

Keywords

• Tooth minerals
• hydroxyapatite
• osteoblast
• cell migration
• hemolysis

References

1. Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT. Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000 1993; 1: 80-91.
2. Singh J, Takhar RK, Bhatia A, Goel A. Bone graft materials: dental aspects. J Nov Res Healthc Nurs 2016; 3: 99-103.
3. Poundarik AA, Wu PC, Evis Z, et al. A direct role of collagen glycation in bone fracture. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2015; 52: 120-30.
4. Evis Z, Doremus RH. A study of phase stability and mechanical properties of hydroxylapatite–nanosize α-alumina composites. Materials Science and Engineering C 2007; 27: 421-5.
5. Wang H, Li Y, Zuo Y, Li J, Ma S, Cheng L. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 3338-48.
6. Liu C, Wang W, Shen W, Chen T, Hu L, Chen Z. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a nonceramic hydroxyapatite. J Endod 1997; 23: 490-3.
7. Baglar S, Erdem U, Dogan M, Turkoz M. Dentinal tubule occluding capability of nano-hydroxyapatite; The in-vitro evaluation. Microsc Res Tech 2018; 81: 843-54.
8. Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13: 77-86.

9. Sukumar S, Drízhal I. Bone grafts in periodontal therapy. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2008; 51: 203-7.
10. Aubin JE, Triffitt JT. Mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblast differentiation. In Principles of Bone Biology, Academic Press 2002; 59-81.
11. Sandberg MM. Matrix in cartilage and bone development: current views on the function and regulation of major organic components. Ann Med 1991; 23: 207-17.
12. Teruel Jde D, Alcolea A, Hernández A, Ruiz AJ. Comparison of chemical composition of enamel and dentine in human, bovine, porcine and ovine teeth. Arch Oral Biol 2015; 60: 768-75.
13. Kim HW, Knowles JC, Li LH, Kim HE. Mechanical performance and osteoblast-like cell responses of fluorine-substituted hydroxyapatite and zirconia dense composite. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 72: 258-68.
14. Dinc DO, Yilmaz M, Sebnem Cetin S, Turk M, Piskin E. Gold-nanoisland-decorated titanium nanorod arrays fabricated by thermal dewetting approach. Surface Innovations 2019; 7: 249-59.
15. Jenifer A, Senthilarasan K, Arumugam S, Sivaprakash P, Sagadevan S, Sakthivel P. Investigation on antibacterial and hemolytic properties of magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Chemical Physics Letters 2021; 771: 13853.
16. Park J, Lakes RS. Biomaterials: an introduction. Springer Science & Business Media 2007.
17. Silver F. Biomaterials, Medical Devices and Tissue Engineering: An Integrated Approach: An Integrated Approach. Springer Science & Business Media 1993.
18. İnsal B, Pişkin İ. Kemik dokusunun fizyolojisi. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Derg 2017; 28: 28-32.
19. Kong YY, William JB, Penninger MJ. Osteoprotegerin ligand: a regulator of immune responses and bone physiology. Immunol Today 2010; 21: 495-502.
20. Lanyon LE. Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling and remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53: 102-7.
21. Leibbrandt A, Penninger JM. RANK/RANKL: regulators of immune responses and bone physiology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1143: 123-50.
22. Türköz MB, Erdem Ü. Katkısız ve Gümüş Katkılı Hidroksiapatitin Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Karakterizasyonu. Int J Engineer Res Develop 2019; 11: 643-56.
23. Erdem U, Turkoz MB. Silver release of Ag (I) doped hydroxyapatite: In vitro study. Microsc Res Tech 2019; 82: 961– 71.
24. Uysal I, Severcan F, Tezcaner A, Evis Z. Co-doping of hydroxyapatite with zinc and fluoride improves mechanical and biological properties of hydroxyapatite. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 2014; 24: 340-9.
25. Erdem, U., & Turkoz, M. B. La3+ and F− dual-doped multifunctional hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: Synthesis and characterization. Microscopy Research and Technique 2021; 84: 3211–20.
26. Topaloğlu U. , Ketani M. A. , Güney Saruhan B. Kemik Doku ve Kemikleşme Çeşitleri. Dicle Üniv Vet Fak Derg 2017; 10: 62-71.
27. d’Aquino R, Graziano A, Sampaolesi M, et al. Human postnatal dental pulp cells co-differentiate into osteoblasts and endotheliocytes: a pivotal synergy leading to adult bone tissue formation. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14: 1162-71.
28. Venugopal J, Vadgama P, Kumar TS, Ramakrishna S. Biocomposite nanofibres and osteoblasts for bone tissue engineering. Nanotechnology 2007; 18: 055101.
29. Ramires PA, Romito A, Cosentino F, Milella E. The influence of titania/hydroxyapatite composite coatings on in vitro osteoblasts behaviour. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 1467-74.
30. Chen L, Mccrate JM, Lee JC, Li H. The role of surface charge on the uptake and biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with osteoblast cells. Nanotechnology 2011; 22: 105708.
31. Lodish H, Berk A, Kaiser CA. et al. Moleküler hücre biyolojisi. Çeviri editörleri: Geçkil H, Özmen M, Yeşilada Ö. Palme Yayıncılık 2011; 6: 248-9.
32. Hughes FJ, Aubin JE, Heersche JN. Differential chemotactic responses of different populations of fetal rat calvaria cells to platelet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor beta. Bone Miner 1992; 19: 63-74.
33. Fuss M, Ehlers EM, Russlies M, Rohwedel J, Behrens P. Characteristics of human chondrocytes, osteoblasts and fibroblasts seeded onto a type I/III collagen sponge under different culture conditions. A light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy study. Ann Anat 2000; 182: 303-10.
34. Korkusuz F, Korkusuz P. Calcium hydroxyapatite ceramics in orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 2006; 31: 63-7.
35. Baumann E, Stoya G, Völkner A, Richter W, Lemke C, Linss W. Hemolysis of human erythrocytes with saponin affects the membrane structure. Acta Histochem 2000; 102: 21-35.