Research Article

Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery

Volume: 5 Number: 3 July 28, 2023
EN

Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery

Abstract

Aims: Infraclavicular and axillary block performed with ultrasound guidance are effective peripheral anesthesia methods applied in upper extremity surgery. We aimed to compare these methods in terms of duration of the block and action, first analgesic requirement and side effects. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was conducted for upper extremity surgery. 100 patients were included to perform infraclavicular block (Group 1, n=51) and axillary block (Group 2, n=49) USG guided. Patients are between 19 and 85 years old. Both groups were premedicated with 0.3 mg/kg midazolam or 0.5-1 μg/kg fentanyl. Both groups were treated with a mixture of local anesthetics in a total volume of 30 mL [7.5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine (Bustesin®, 56.25 mg), 7.5 mL 2% prilocaine (Priloc®, 225 mg) and 5 mL saline] was injected. Block placement time, motor and sensory tests, postoperative 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th. and analgesic requirement at the 24th hour, Bromage scale, Verbal Rating scale, nausea vomiting, patient satisfaction, and block adequacy data were recorded. Results: In this study, 60% of the participants included were male and 40% were female. The systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures were higher in group of axillary blockade than those with blockade of infraclavicular blocks. Radial, median, ulnar and musculocutaneous nerve pin-prick test loss and loss of touch test was more frequent in infraclavicular block patients. According to the Bromage scale, the partial block was seen more frequently in patients who had a close block and a full block infraclavicular block. In patients with the axillary blockade, sedoanalgesia and general anesthesia needs after postoperative intraoperative 20 min and postoperative sedoanalgesia was needed. According to the postoperative Bromage scale; complete and close to the thumb and more frequent in infraclavicular block patients. In Postop VRS, it was observed that the patients with the axillary block group had mild, moderate, and severe pain complaints. Patient satisfaction in the postoperative period was similar in both groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between these techniques regarding surgical adequacy and subjective postoperative analgesia and dysesthesia. Complete and near-complete block rates in the infraclavicular block approach are minimally higher than in the axillary block approach.

Keywords

References

  1. Hadzic A, Arliss J, Kerimoglu B. A comparison of infraclavicular nerve block versus general anesthesia for hand and wrist daycase surgeries. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):127-132.
  2. Erdine S, Üst Ekstremite Somatik Blokları, Rejyonel Anestezi, Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri 2008;7-33;83-108.
  3. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Clinic Anesthesiology; 4Edition, The Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Chapter 17: Peripheral Nerve Blocks 2005:324-358.
  4. Collins VJ. Regional Anesthesia. In: Collins VJ. (Ed). Principles of Anesthesiology: General and regional anesthesia. Philadephia: Lea & Febiger Co. 1993;1232-1281.
  5. Marhofer P, Greher M, Kapral S. Ultrasound guidance in regional anaesanesthesia. J Anaesth. 2005;94:7-17.
  6. Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR. Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography. Anaesthesia 2006; 61:148-158.
  7. Raj PP, Montgomery SJ, Nettles D, Jenkins MT. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block a new approach. Anesth Analg 1973;52(6):897-904.
  8. Whifer K. Coracoid block a safe and easy technique. Br J Anaesth 1981;53(8):845-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Anaesthesiology, Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

July 26, 2023

Publication Date

July 28, 2023

Submission Date

May 25, 2023

Acceptance Date

July 18, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 5 Number: 3

APA
İnceöz, H., & Baykal, Z. (2023). Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 5(3), 275-281. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1300766
AMA
1.İnceöz H, Baykal Z. Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2023;5(3):275-281. doi:10.38053/acmj.1300766
Chicago
İnceöz, Hansa, and Zehra Baykal. 2023. “Comparison of Infraclavicular Block and Axillary Block Activities Performed in Ultrasonography Coexisting in Upper Extremity Surgery”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 5 (3): 275-81. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1300766.
EndNote
İnceöz H, Baykal Z (July 1, 2023) Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 5 3 275–281.
IEEE
[1]H. İnceöz and Z. Baykal, “Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 275–281, July 2023, doi: 10.38053/acmj.1300766.
ISNAD
İnceöz, Hansa - Baykal, Zehra. “Comparison of Infraclavicular Block and Axillary Block Activities Performed in Ultrasonography Coexisting in Upper Extremity Surgery”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 5/3 (July 1, 2023): 275-281. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1300766.
JAMA
1.İnceöz H, Baykal Z. Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2023;5:275–281.
MLA
İnceöz, Hansa, and Zehra Baykal. “Comparison of Infraclavicular Block and Axillary Block Activities Performed in Ultrasonography Coexisting in Upper Extremity Surgery”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, July 2023, pp. 275-81, doi:10.38053/acmj.1300766.
Vancouver
1.Hansa İnceöz, Zehra Baykal. Comparison of infraclavicular block and axillary block activities performed in ultrasonography coexisting in upper extremity surgery. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2023 Jul. 1;5(3):275-81. doi:10.38053/acmj.1300766

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)