Research Article

The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye

Volume: 8 Number: 4 July 16, 2026

The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye

Abstract

Aims: Evidence-based guidelines standardize care; however, their expanding scope may hinder the consistent implementation of these guidelines. However, the impact of digital health and Artificial Intelligence (AI) on guideline adherence and clinician perspectives remains unclear. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 94 medical oncologists completed a structured, Likert-scale questionnaire. Statistical analyses included Spearman’s correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess associations between variables, followed by multivariate linear regression to identify the independent predictors of AI perception. Results: Digital health technologies were frequently used (64.9%), and 76.6% of the participants reported that these tools accelerated the decision-making process. Of the participants, 31.9% indicated that decision-making would be more difficult without AI. Guideline adherence was notably high (94.7%), with over 75% supporting its role in personalized decision-making and integration of complex patient-specific factors, while 59.6% found it useful in data-limited clinical scenarios. The most commonly identified application areas were toxicity management (75.5%) and treatment selection (71.3%). Trust in AI was strongly associated with its alignment with established guidelines (91.5%), and most participants emphasized that AI should support clinical judgment within ethical and legal frameworks. In the multivariate analysis, future perspective emerged as the only independent predictor of AI perception (β=0.353). Conclusion: Medical oncologists demonstrated high guideline adherence and cautiously positive attitudes toward AI. Trust in AI is closely tied to guideline compatibility, and future expectations significantly shape AI acceptance. These findings highlight the need for transparent, guideline-aligned AI systems and structured education for their integration into oncology practice.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

no

Ethical Statement

The Ethics Committee approved this study (Approval No: 2026-02/7, Date: 21.01.2026). All procedures were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Thanks

The authors thank the medical oncologists who participated in the survey for their valuable contributions to data collection throughout the study period.

References

  1. Kann BH, Johnson SB, Aerts H, Mak RH, Nguyen PL. Changes in length and complexity of clinical practice guidelines in oncology, 1996-2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200841. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0841
  2. Cufer T, Kosty MP. ESMO/ASCO recommendations for a global curriculum in medical oncology edition 2023. JCO Glob Oncol. 2023;9: e2300277. doi:10.1200/go.23.00277
  3. Ismaila N, Mbuagbaw L, Ma J, Thabane L. Clinical practice guidelines adherence and the impact on health outcomes in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Public Health Guidel. 2025;2(3):e70030. doi:10.1002/gin2.70030
  4. Bierbaum M, Rapport F, Arnolda G, et al. Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):39. doi:10.1186/s13012-020-00991-3
  5. Bora AM, Piechotta V, Kreuzberger N, et al. The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies in oncology-a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):347. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09189-x
  6. Aapro M, Bossi P, Dasari A, et al. Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(10):4589-4612. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05539-1
  7. Dicker AP, Jim HSL. Intersection of digital health and oncology. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018;2:1-4. doi:10.1200/cci.18.00070
  8. Mandó P, Moutafi M, Connolly EA, et al. Digital health technology in oncology: results from a survey by the ESMO Young Oncologists Committee and medical student alumni. ESMO Real World Data Digit Oncol. 2026;12:100697. doi:10.1016/j.esmorw.2026.100697

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Oncology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 16, 2026

Submission Date

May 3, 2026

Acceptance Date

July 10, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 4

APA
Hannarici, Z., & Turhan, A. (2026). The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, 8(4), 797-803. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1943411
AMA
1.Hannarici Z, Turhan A. The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2026;8(4):797-803. doi:10.38053/acmj.1943411
Chicago
Hannarici, Zekeriya, and Aykut Turhan. 2026. “The Impact of Digital Health Technology Use on Oncology-Specific Clinical Guideline Adherence Among Medical Oncologists in Turkiye”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 8 (4): 797-803. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1943411.
EndNote
Hannarici Z, Turhan A (July 1, 2026) The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 8 4 797–803.
IEEE
[1]Z. Hannarici and A. Turhan, “The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye”, Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 797–803, July 2026, doi: 10.38053/acmj.1943411.
ISNAD
Hannarici, Zekeriya - Turhan, Aykut. “The Impact of Digital Health Technology Use on Oncology-Specific Clinical Guideline Adherence Among Medical Oncologists in Turkiye”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal 8/4 (July 1, 2026): 797-803. https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1943411.
JAMA
1.Hannarici Z, Turhan A. The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2026;8:797–803.
MLA
Hannarici, Zekeriya, and Aykut Turhan. “The Impact of Digital Health Technology Use on Oncology-Specific Clinical Guideline Adherence Among Medical Oncologists in Turkiye”. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, July 2026, pp. 797-03, doi:10.38053/acmj.1943411.
Vancouver
1.Zekeriya Hannarici, Aykut Turhan. The impact of digital health technology use on oncology-specific clinical guideline adherence among medical oncologists in Turkiye. Anatolian Curr Med J / ACMJ / acmj. 2026 Jul. 1;8(4):797-803. doi:10.38053/acmj.1943411

 

TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
 

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency:  Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show

 

Journal Indexes and Platforms: 

TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.


 

The indexes of the journal's are;


 

download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiVHJfSW5kZXhfbG9nby5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiMDFiOS82MmZhLzA3MzMvNjlkZjNlNTdhMmI4ZjkuODYxMzMxMjQucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzc2MjQxNzY3LCJub25jZSI6ImQyMTQ4MjdiNTg1ZjVmMGQwYzAzZTMxNzMwM2QwMThmIn0.RmnGvwR536HdIoKpGO-ApytZ5aRPRT_BFXE2EpGSIqc

asos-index.png
 
f9ab67f.png
 
WorldCat_Logo_H_Color.png
 

 

18596download?token=eyJhdXRoX3JvbGVzIjpbXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiT3BlbkFpcmUuanBnIiwicGF0aCI6IjUyMWYvZjljYy8wMDk3LzY5ZGYzZDNiYmVkZGU0LjQzNDM2OTU3LmpwZyIsImV4cCI6MTc3NjI0MTQ4NCwibm9uY2UiOiIwYjgxZDE2NzRiNzhjMWQyOGVmMDM1OTA1MzI5NjdjZiJ9.xeFppR1ubA4i-dHG-u07ht9bQNogFheXQjLyEaP9GgAimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQgDnBwx0yUPRKuetgIurtELxYERFv20CPAUcPe4jYrrJiwXzac8rGXlzd57gl8iikb1Tk&usqp=CAU

 

84039476_619085835534619_7808805634291269632_n.jpg

 

 

 

The platforms of the journal's are;
 

COPE.jpg
 
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTbq2FM8NTdXECzlOUCeKQ1dvrISFL-LhxhC7zy1ZQeJk-GGKSx2XkWQvrsHxcfhtfHWxM&usqp=CAUicmje_1_orig.png
 
 
ncbi.png
 
ORCID_logo.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQlwX77nfpy3Bu9mpMBZa0miWT2sRt2zjAPJKg2V69ODTrjZM1nT1BbhWzTVPsTNKJMZzQ&usqp=CAU
 

 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaWSousoprPWGwE-qxwxGH2y0ByZ_zdLMN-Oq93MsZpBVFOTfxi9uXV7tdr39qvyE-U0I&usqp=CAU
 


 


 

 


 


The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
 

TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit 
 


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"

 

All articles published in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND)