Araştırma Makalesi

Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 31 Ocak 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients

Öz

Background: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (TOLs) are a frequent cause of chronic ankle pain and functional limitation. Despite their clinical significance, data on their prevalence, anatomical distribution, and morphological features remain limited, particularly concerning sex-based differences. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed 5,356 ankle MRI scans performed over five years to identify patients with TOLs. 490 skeletally mature patients (283 females, 207 males) were included. Lesions were evaluated based on anatomical localization using a standardized nine-zone grid, graded according to the Bristol/Hepple classification, and measured using region of interest (ROI) tools. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed using ICC and Cohen’s kappa statistics. Results: The overall prevalence of TOLs was 9.1%, with similar rates in males (9.3%) and females (9.0%). The mean age was 46.2±14.3 years. Lesions were most commonly located in Zones 4 (33.7%) and 7 (33.5%). The mean lesion area was 78.2±61.9 mm², with the largest lesions in Zone 4. Grade 1 (26.2%) and Grade 5 (20.70%) were the most frequent lesion grades. Male patients were significantly younger(42,2) and had larger lesions (p<0.01), whereas bilateral involvement and medial localization were more common in females (p<0.05). Conclusion: This study provides the first large-scale MRI-based analysis integrating zonal lesion mapping with sex-specific morphological characteristics of TOLs. The findings highlight medial talar dome vulnerability and reveal sex-related differences in lesion presentation, suggesting distinct pathomechanical pathways. These results may aid in early diagnosis and guide personalized management strategies for TOLs.

Anahtar Kelimeler

talus osteochondral lesions, incidence, epidemiology, osteochondritis dissecans, Hepple classification.

Destekleyen Kurum

No funds have been received for this study.

Etik Beyan

Antalya Training and Research Hospital institutional review board approved the study protocol (01/16, 06.01.2022).

Kaynakça

  1. Bruns J, Habermann C, Werner M. Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Review on Talus Osteochondral Injuries, Including Osteochondritis Dissecans. Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):1380S-1401S.
  2. Savage-Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, Kennedy JG. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence‑based treatment paradigm. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7(5):414-22.
  3. Mangwani J, Brockett C, Pegg E. Osteochondral lesions of talus. Bone Joint Res. 2024;13(12):790-792.
  4. Orr JD, Dawson LK, Garcia EJ, Kirk KL. Incidence of osteochondral lesions of the talus in the United States military. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(10):948-54.
  5. Elias I, Raikin SM, Schweitzer ME, Besser MP, Morrison WB, Zoga AC. Osteochondral lesions of the distal tibial plafond: localization and morphologic characteristics with an anatomical grid. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(6):524-9.
  6. Raikin SM, Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(2):154-61.
  7. Hepple S, Winson IG, Glew D. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a revised classification. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(12):789-93.
  8. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
  9. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
  10. Martijn HA, Lambers KTA, Dahmen J, Stufkens SAS, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. High incidence of (osteo)chondral lesions in ankle fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(5):1523-1534.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Doğruöz, F., Yüncü, M., Ertan, M. B., Kiliç, K. K., Yapar, A., & Köse, Ö. (2026). Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients. Archives of Current Medical Research, 7(1), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1719683
AMA
1.Doğruöz F, Yüncü M, Ertan MB, Kiliç KK, Yapar A, Köse Ö. Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients. Arch Curr Med Res. 2026;7(1):179-188. doi:10.47482/acmr.1719683
Chicago
Doğruöz, Fırat, Murat Yüncü, Mehmet Barış Ertan, Koray Kaya Kiliç, Aliekber Yapar, ve Özkan Köse. 2026. “Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients”. Archives of Current Medical Research 7 (1): 179-88. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1719683.
EndNote
Doğruöz F, Yüncü M, Ertan MB, Kiliç KK, Yapar A, Köse Ö (01 Ocak 2026) Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients. Archives of Current Medical Research 7 1 179–188.
IEEE
[1]F. Doğruöz, M. Yüncü, M. B. Ertan, K. K. Kiliç, A. Yapar, ve Ö. Köse, “Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients”, Arch Curr Med Res, c. 7, sy 1, ss. 179–188, Oca. 2026, doi: 10.47482/acmr.1719683.
ISNAD
Doğruöz, Fırat - Yüncü, Murat - Ertan, Mehmet Barış - Kiliç, Koray Kaya - Yapar, Aliekber - Köse, Özkan. “Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients”. Archives of Current Medical Research 7/1 (01 Ocak 2026): 179-188. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1719683.
JAMA
1.Doğruöz F, Yüncü M, Ertan MB, Kiliç KK, Yapar A, Köse Ö. Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients. Arch Curr Med Res. 2026;7:179–188.
MLA
Doğruöz, Fırat, vd. “Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients”. Archives of Current Medical Research, c. 7, sy 1, Ocak 2026, ss. 179-88, doi:10.47482/acmr.1719683.
Vancouver
1.Fırat Doğruöz, Murat Yüncü, Mehmet Barış Ertan, Koray Kaya Kiliç, Aliekber Yapar, Özkan Köse. Epidemiology of the talus osteochondral lesions: an MRI survey in 490 patients. Arch Curr Med Res. 01 Ocak 2026;7(1):179-88. doi:10.47482/acmr.1719683