Araştırma Makalesi

Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 2 Haziran 2026
PDF İndir
TR EN

Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters

Öz

Background: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and metabolic parameters obtained from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) across different T-stages in patients with rectal cancer (RC), and to evaluate the prognostic significance of these imaging biomarkers for survival outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent both pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. T-staging was performed using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging images, and ADC measurements were obtained from DWI. Metabolic tumor parameters, in-cluding maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), were obtained from PET/CT images. A correlation analysis was performed between ADC and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters and the T-stage. ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ADC and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in the early T stage. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and analyzed. Results: A moderate negative correlation was found between T-stage and ADC (r = -0.43, p = 0.003), and a low-moderate positive correlation was found between TLG and ADC (r = 0.33, p = 0.027). ADC showed good diagnostic performance in identifying early T-stage tumors (AUC = 0.86; cutoff = 864 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s). The OS in the low ADC group was 58.1±6.5 (45.3-70.9) and in the high ADC group 97.4±10.9 (76.1-110.8). PFS was 53.7±5.9 (42.1-65.1) in the low ADC group and 93.3±10.4 (73.0-113.6) in the high ADC group. OS (p = 0.018) and PFS (p = 0.042) were longer in the high ADC group, indicating a statistically significant association. Conclusion: ADC showed a significant association with both tumor stage and survival outcomes and may serve as a nonin-vasive prognostic biomarker in non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma. Although TLG correlated with T stage, PET/CT-de-rived metabolic parameters did not predict survival. These findings support the potential role of DWI in pre-treatment risk stratification.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Apparent diffusion coefficient, total lesion glycolysis, survival analysis, rectal cancer

Destekleyen Kurum

No funding was used in the study.

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by the Non-Interventional Clinical Trials Eth-ics Committee of Sivas Cumhuriyet University on 18.01.2024 with deci-sion number 2024-01/03.

Teşekkür

None to declare.

Kaynakça

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Fedewa SA, Butterly LF, Anderson JC, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70:145-64.
  2. Tanaka A, Uehara K, Aiba T, Ogura A, Mukai T, Yokoyama Y, et al. The role of surgery for locally recurrent and second recurrent rectal cancer with metastatic disease. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:328-35.
  3. Zlobec I, Lugli A. Prognostic and predictive factors in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2008; 61:561-9.
  4. Figueredo A, Coombes ME, Mukherjee S. Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2008(3):CD005390.
  5. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(10):2479-2516.
  6. Gu J, Khong PL, Wang S, Chan Q, Law W, Zhang J. Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol. 2011;13(5):1020-8.
  7. Dudeck O, Zeile M, Pink D, Pech M, Tunn PU, Reichardt P, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging allows monitoring of anticancer treatment effects in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(5):1109-13.
  8. Zhu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang W, Xue L, Li Y, Jiang J, et al. Value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting extramural venous invasion in locally advanced gastric cancer and prognostic significance. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11(1):328-340.
  9. Curvo-Semedo L, Lambregts DM, Maas M, Beets GL, Caseiro-Alves F, Beets-Tan RG. Diffusion-weighted MRI in rectal cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1365-71.
  10. Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(4):1465-1475.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Atik, İ., Hasbek, Z., Yılmaz, M., Atalar, M. H., Gül, E., & Yüceer, R. O. (2026). Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters. Archives of Current Medical Research, 7(2), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1723910
AMA
1.Atik İ, Hasbek Z, Yılmaz M, Atalar MH, Gül E, Yüceer RO. Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters. Arch Curr Med Res. 2026;7(2):393-400. doi:10.47482/acmr.1723910
Chicago
Atik, İrfan, Zekiye Hasbek, Mukaddes Yılmaz, Mehmet Haydar Atalar, Enes Gül, ve Ramazan Oğuz Yüceer. 2026. “Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters”. Archives of Current Medical Research 7 (2): 393-400. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1723910.
EndNote
Atik İ, Hasbek Z, Yılmaz M, Atalar MH, Gül E, Yüceer RO (01 Haziran 2026) Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters. Archives of Current Medical Research 7 2 393–400.
IEEE
[1]İ. Atik, Z. Hasbek, M. Yılmaz, M. H. Atalar, E. Gül, ve R. O. Yüceer, “Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters”, Arch Curr Med Res, c. 7, sy 2, ss. 393–400, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.47482/acmr.1723910.
ISNAD
Atik, İrfan - Hasbek, Zekiye - Yılmaz, Mukaddes - Atalar, Mehmet Haydar - Gül, Enes - Yüceer, Ramazan Oğuz. “Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters”. Archives of Current Medical Research 7/2 (01 Haziran 2026): 393-400. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1723910.
JAMA
1.Atik İ, Hasbek Z, Yılmaz M, Atalar MH, Gül E, Yüceer RO. Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters. Arch Curr Med Res. 2026;7:393–400.
MLA
Atik, İrfan, vd. “Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters”. Archives of Current Medical Research, c. 7, sy 2, Haziran 2026, ss. 393-00, doi:10.47482/acmr.1723910.
Vancouver
1.İrfan Atik, Zekiye Hasbek, Mukaddes Yılmaz, Mehmet Haydar Atalar, Enes Gül, Ramazan Oğuz Yüceer. Prognostic Significance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in T-Staging of Rectal Cancer and Its Association with 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters. Arch Curr Med Res. 01 Haziran 2026;7(2):393-400. doi:10.47482/acmr.1723910