Klinik Araştırma

Suzuki Frame Results in the Treatment of Comminuted Phalanx Fractures

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 29 Ocak 2021
PDF İndir
EN

Suzuki Frame Results in the Treatment of Comminuted Phalanx Fractures

Abstract

Background: Comminuted fracture of the PIP joint is one of the most challenging fractures to be treated in hand surgery practice. The pins and rubber traction frame is an easy method to perform for these fractures. This study aimed to present the treatment stages of patients who had PIP joint fractures-dislocations with the pins and rubber traction frame and the functional results of patients. Methods: The results of eight patients with fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Age and gender of patients, time between trauma and surgery, postoperative follow-up periods, affected area on the joint surface, postoperative complications, range of motion of PIP and DIP joints, affected finger, and the causes of the trauma were recorded. Results: Five (62.5%) patients were male, and three (37.5%) patients were female in this study. The mean age of the patients was 28.50 ± 3.42 years. The mean range of motion of the PIP joint examined in the postoperative 12th month was 4.88° to 86.25°. In the same period, the mean range of motion of the DIP joint of the patients was 4.38° to 86.25°. We obtained union in all patients. Malunion or nonunion and osteomyelitis were not seen in any patients. Conclusions: The pins and rubber traction frame is a method that can be used safely and effectively in fractures of the phalanx joints that are difficult, comminuted, and involving the joint.

Keywords

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint , Fracture , Dislocation , Dynamic Fixation , Frame.

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Dean BJ, Little C. Fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges. Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(1):43-56.
  2. 2. Rockwood C, Green D, Butler Jr T. Fractures and dislocations of the hand. 4th edn. ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven; 1996. 607-744 p.
  3. 3. Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am. 1998;23(3):368-80.
  4. 4. Williams RM, Kiefhaber TR, Sommerkamp TG, Stern PJ. Treatment of unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal fracture/dislocations using a hemi-hamate autograft. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(5):856-65.
  5. 5. Nalbantoğlu U, Gereli A, Kocaoğlu B, Aktaş S, Seyhan M. Surgical treatment of unstable fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(5):373.
  6. 6. Deitch MA, Kiefhaber TR, Comisar BR, Stern PJ. Dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint: surgical complications and long-term results. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(5):914-23.
  7. 7. Ng C, Oliver C. Fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joints of the fingers. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):705-12.
  8. 8. Deshmukh S, Kumar D, Mathur K, Thomas B. Complex fracturedislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of the hand: Results of a modified pins and rubbers traction system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(3):406-12.
  9. 9. Agarwal AK, Karri V, Pickford MA. Avoiding pitfalls of the pins and rubbers traction technique for fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58(5):489-95.
  10. 10. Suzuki Y, Matsunaga T, Sato S, Yokoi T. The pins and rubbers traction system for treatment of comminuted intraarticular fractures and fracturedislocations in the hand. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 1994;19(1):98-107.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Turgut, M. C., & Toy, S. (2021). Suzuki Frame Results in the Treatment of Comminuted Phalanx Fractures. Archives of Current Medical Research, 2(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.2021.11