Klinik Araştırma
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparison of Suture-Button Versus HookPlate Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Yıl 2021, , 115 - 120, 05.05.2021
https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.2021.24

Öz

Background: This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of clavicular hook plate fixation versus suture-button fixation of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations.

Methods: 21 patients are retrospectively evaluated in the present study whom diagnosed as type III-V ACJ dislocations and treated by two different surgical methods. The hook plate group comprised 9 patients to whom acromioclavicular fixation. The suture-button group comprised 12 patients to whom coracoclavicular fixation. All patients were evaluated by Constant Murley Score (CMS) and visual analogue score (VAS). Loss of reduction and radiological results were evaluated with the coracoclavicular distance (CCD).

Results: The average follow-up was 31 months (range, 15–56 months). There was no significant difference between hook-plate and suture-button groups in terms of CMS. However, VAS in hook plate group better than suture-button group (p = 0.038). Suturebutton fixation adjusted the CCD more than hook plate fixation compared to the opposite shoulder (p = 0.482).

Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the hook plate and suture-button group in terms of the clinical outcomes. However, CCD in the suture-button group was better adjusted to the hook plate group. Suture-button fixation is a good option for the treatment of ACJ dislocations, as implant removal may be required in most cases in which the hook plate is applied.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Oussedik S. Injuries to the clavicle and acromioclavicular joint. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2007;68(4):M68-70.
  • 2. Bin Abd Razak HR, Yeo EN, Yeo W, Lie TD. Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope(®) fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(5):869-75.
  • 3. Rieser GR, Edwards K, Gould GC, Markert RJ, Goswami T, Rubino LJ. Distal-third clavicle fracture fixation: a biomechanical evaluation of fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(6):848-55.
  • 4. Rockwood C. Injuries to the acromio-clavicular joint. Fracture in adalts. 1984;1.
  • 5. Mardani-Kivi M, Mirbolook A, Salariyeh M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. The comparison of Ethibond sutures and semitendinosus autograft in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(5):307-10.
  • 6. Kezunović M, Bjelica D, Popović S. Comparative study of surgical treatment of acromioclavicular luxation. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013;70(3):292-7.
  • 7. Basyoni Y, El-Ganainy AE, Aboul-Saad M. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using anchor sutures: surgical technique and preliminary results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(3):307-11.
  • 8. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(5):848-50.
  • 9. Johansen JA, Grutter PW, McFarland EG, Petersen SA. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: indications for treatment and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2 Suppl):S70-82.
  • 10. Wang C, Meng JH, Zhang YW, Shi MM. Suture button versus hook plate for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A metaanalysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(4):1023-30.
  • 11. Mares O, Luneau S, Staquet V, Beltrand E, Bousquet PJ, Maynou C. Acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations: outcomes and pitfalls of reconstruction procedures using a synthetic ligament. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(7):721-6.
  • 12. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987(214):160-4.
  • 13. Zhang L, Zhou X, Qi J, Zeng Y, Zhang S, Liu G, et al. Modified closedloop double-endobutton technique for repair of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(1):940-8.
  • 14. Darrow JC, Jr., Smith JA, Lockwood RC. A new conservative method for treatment of Type III acromioclavicular separations. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980;11(4):727-33.
  • 15. Schlegel TF, Burks RT, Marcus RL, Dunn HK. A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):699-703.
  • 16. Lancaster S, Horowitz M, Alonso J. Complete acromioclavicular separations. A comparison of operative methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987(216):80-8.
  • 17. Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(10):1153-7.
  • 18. Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(3):324-31.
  • 19. Broos P, Stoffelen D, Van de Sijpe K, Fourneau I. [Surgical management of complete Tossy III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with the Bosworth screw or the Wolter plate. A critical evaluation]. Unfallchirurgie. 1997;23(4):153-9; discussion 60.
  • 20. Choi NH, Lim SM, Lee SY, Lim TK. Loss of reduction and complications of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous tendon graft in acute acromioclavicular dislocations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(4):692-8.
  • 21. Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(7):1045-51.
  • 22. Chen CY, Yang SW, Lin KY, Lin KC, Tarng YW, Renn JH, et al. Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:42.
  • 23. Pan X, Lv RY, Lv MG, Zhang DG. Tight rope vs clavicular hook plate for Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: A meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(4):1045-52.
  • 24. Hapa O, Akşahin E, Erduran M, Davul S, Havitçioğlu H, LaPrade RF, et al. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair. Knee. 2013;20(6):577-80.
  • 25. Kienast B, Thietje R, Queitsch C, Gille J, Schulz AP, Meiners J. Midterm results after operative treatment of rockwood grade III-Vacromioclavicular joint dislocations with an AC-hook-plate. Eur J Med Res. 2011;16(2):52-6.
  • 26. Sun LJ, Lu D, Tao ZY, Yu XB, Hu W, Ma YF, et al. Analysis of risk factors for loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the suture-button. J Orthop Sci. 2019;24(5):817-21.
Yıl 2021, , 115 - 120, 05.05.2021
https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.2021.24

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Oussedik S. Injuries to the clavicle and acromioclavicular joint. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2007;68(4):M68-70.
  • 2. Bin Abd Razak HR, Yeo EN, Yeo W, Lie TD. Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope(®) fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(5):869-75.
  • 3. Rieser GR, Edwards K, Gould GC, Markert RJ, Goswami T, Rubino LJ. Distal-third clavicle fracture fixation: a biomechanical evaluation of fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(6):848-55.
  • 4. Rockwood C. Injuries to the acromio-clavicular joint. Fracture in adalts. 1984;1.
  • 5. Mardani-Kivi M, Mirbolook A, Salariyeh M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. The comparison of Ethibond sutures and semitendinosus autograft in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(5):307-10.
  • 6. Kezunović M, Bjelica D, Popović S. Comparative study of surgical treatment of acromioclavicular luxation. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2013;70(3):292-7.
  • 7. Basyoni Y, El-Ganainy AE, Aboul-Saad M. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using anchor sutures: surgical technique and preliminary results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(3):307-11.
  • 8. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71(5):848-50.
  • 9. Johansen JA, Grutter PW, McFarland EG, Petersen SA. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: indications for treatment and treatment options. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(2 Suppl):S70-82.
  • 10. Wang C, Meng JH, Zhang YW, Shi MM. Suture button versus hook plate for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A metaanalysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(4):1023-30.
  • 11. Mares O, Luneau S, Staquet V, Beltrand E, Bousquet PJ, Maynou C. Acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations: outcomes and pitfalls of reconstruction procedures using a synthetic ligament. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(7):721-6.
  • 12. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987(214):160-4.
  • 13. Zhang L, Zhou X, Qi J, Zeng Y, Zhang S, Liu G, et al. Modified closedloop double-endobutton technique for repair of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15(1):940-8.
  • 14. Darrow JC, Jr., Smith JA, Lockwood RC. A new conservative method for treatment of Type III acromioclavicular separations. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980;11(4):727-33.
  • 15. Schlegel TF, Burks RT, Marcus RL, Dunn HK. A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):699-703.
  • 16. Lancaster S, Horowitz M, Alonso J. Complete acromioclavicular separations. A comparison of operative methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987(216):80-8.
  • 17. Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128(10):1153-7.
  • 18. Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(3):324-31.
  • 19. Broos P, Stoffelen D, Van de Sijpe K, Fourneau I. [Surgical management of complete Tossy III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with the Bosworth screw or the Wolter plate. A critical evaluation]. Unfallchirurgie. 1997;23(4):153-9; discussion 60.
  • 20. Choi NH, Lim SM, Lee SY, Lim TK. Loss of reduction and complications of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with autogenous tendon graft in acute acromioclavicular dislocations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(4):692-8.
  • 21. Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(7):1045-51.
  • 22. Chen CY, Yang SW, Lin KY, Lin KC, Tarng YW, Renn JH, et al. Comparison of single coracoclavicular suture fixation and hook plate for the treatment of acute unstable distal clavicle fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:42.
  • 23. Pan X, Lv RY, Lv MG, Zhang DG. Tight rope vs clavicular hook plate for Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: A meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(4):1045-52.
  • 24. Hapa O, Akşahin E, Erduran M, Davul S, Havitçioğlu H, LaPrade RF, et al. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair. Knee. 2013;20(6):577-80.
  • 25. Kienast B, Thietje R, Queitsch C, Gille J, Schulz AP, Meiners J. Midterm results after operative treatment of rockwood grade III-Vacromioclavicular joint dislocations with an AC-hook-plate. Eur J Med Res. 2011;16(2):52-6.
  • 26. Sun LJ, Lu D, Tao ZY, Yu XB, Hu W, Ma YF, et al. Analysis of risk factors for loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the suture-button. J Orthop Sci. 2019;24(5):817-21.
Toplam 26 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Yazarlar

Osman Yağız Atlı 0000-0001-6657-6860

Hüseyin Bilgehan Çevik 0000-0003-1945-3715

Hakan Aslan 0000-0002-6050-0571

Evrim Duman 0000-0002-3493-5125

Yayımlanma Tarihi 5 Mayıs 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 26 Ocak 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021

Kaynak Göster

APA Atlı, O. Y., Çevik, H. B., Aslan, H., Duman, E. (2021). Comparison of Suture-Button Versus HookPlate Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. Archives of Current Medical Research, 2(2), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.2021.24

Archives of Current Medical Research (ACMR), araştırmaları ücretsiz sunmanın daha büyük bir küresel bilgi alışverişini desteklediğini göz önünde bulundurarak, tüm içeriğe anında açık erişim sağlar. Kamunun erişimine açık olması, daha büyük bir küresel bilgi alışverişini destekler.

http://www.acmronline.org/