Inadequate informative capacity of arthroscopic lateral epicondylitis treatmentrelated youtube videos

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 91 - 96, 31.05.2024

Abdulhamit Mısır , Muhammed Bilal Kürk , Niyazi İğde , Ali Yüce

https://doi.org/10.47482/acmr.1468177

Öz

Background: In the literature, the quality of YouTube videos about lateral epicondylitis has been investigated by researchers so far. However, the quality of YouTube videos related to arthroscopic treatment has not been evaluated yet. So, this study aims to evaluate the informative capacity of YouTube videos related to arthroscopic lateral epicondylitis treatment.
Methods: For the study, a standard YouTube search has been conducted by using the terms 'tennis elbow arthroscopic treatment' and 'lateral epicondylitis arthroscopic treatment. For each search query, the 50 most "relevant" videos, as determined by YouTube's algorithm, have been taken into consideration (a total of 100 videos). After the exclusion of several videos, a total of 58 videos are included in the analysis. The informative quality and capacity of the videos have been evaluated by using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), Global Quality Score (GQS), DISCERN, and Lateral Epicondylitis Specific Score (LESS) scoring systems.
Results: According to DISCERN, 18.97% of the videos are of poor-to-very poor quality. The rate is 34.49% for LESS. According to the GQS and JAMA scores, the rate of low-quality videos is 36.21% and 44.83%, respectively. In addition, it is also seen that the mean DISCERN, LESS, GQS, and JAMA scores are significantly higher in videos uploaded by non-physicians than in those uploaded by physicians (p<0.05).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that YouTube videos related to arthroscopic lateral epicondylitis treatment have a poor informative capacity. This issue has to be paid attention to by orthopaedic surgeons and they should lead the patients to safer sources. Patients should be advised to consider searching for better quality and more informative resources when they want to seek information about in the arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lateral epicondylitis, arthroscopy, YouTube, video, information, quality

Kaynakça

• O’Leary B, Saker C, Stamm MA, Mulcahey MK. YouTube videos lack efficacy as a patient education tool for rehabilitation and return to play after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(3):e1111-e1118
• Umur L, Sürücü S. Are YouTube videos a sufficient resource for informing patients in the treatment of rotator cuff tears? J Health Sci Med 2022; 5(1): 99-103
• Muller AL, Baker JF. Analysis of lumbar fusion and lumbar arthroplasty videos on YouTube. Int J Spine Surg. 2022;16(2):283-290.
• Akpolat, AO, Kurdal, DP. Is quality of YouTube content on Bankart lesion and its surgical treatment adequate?. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:78
• Kuru T, Erken HY. Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on rotator cuff tears Cureus. 2020; 12(2): e6852
• Yuce A, Oto O, Vural A, Misir A. YouTube provides low-quality videos about talus osteochondral lesions and their arthroscopic treatment. Foot Ankle Surg. 2023; 29(5):441-445
• Staunton PF, Baker JF, Green J, Devitt A. Online curves: A quality analysis of scoliosis videos on YouTube Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(23):1857-61
• Kwak D, Park JW, Won Y, Kwon Y, Lee JI. Quality and reliability evaluation of online videos on carpal tunnel syndrome: a YouTube video-based study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e059239
• Yüce A, Ocak O, Gur V, Misir A. YouTube videos about plantar fasciitis and calcaneal spurs are insufficient and poor quality. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2023;113(3):22-187
• Sahin AA, Boz M. Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on lateral epicondylitis surgery on YouTube. Exp Biomed Res 2022; 5(3): 285-292
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-1245
• Karagoz B, Bakir M, Kececi T (February 24, 2022) Evaluation of the96 accuracy and quality of information in videos about lateral epicondylitis shared on internet video sharing services. Cureus 14(2): e22583
• Özcan F, Gürçay E. Is the information about lateral epicondylitis on the YouTube platform reliable and of good quality? Phys Sportsmed. 2023; 51(5):458-462
• Dy CJ, Taylor SA, Patel RM, McCarthy MM, Roberts TR, Daluiski A. Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used? Hand (N Y). 2012; 7(4):420-5
• Moradi A, Pasdar P, Mehrad-Majd H, Ebrahimzadeh MH. Clinical outcomes of open versus arthroscopic surgery for lateral epicondylitis, evidence from a systematic review. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019;7(2):91-104.
• Egekeze N, Dubin J, Williams K, Bernhardt M. The age of OrthoInfo: A randomized controlled trial evaluating patient comprehension of informed consent. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(19):e81.
• Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for the meniscus: A YouTubebased quality-control study. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(1):233-38.
• Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-11
• Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-7
• Aydın M, Mert A. Assessment of lateral epicondylitis videos on YouTube. Bagcilar Med Bull 2021;6(4):390-396
• Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens 2014;8(7):481-490
• Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20(14):4066-4070