Kondrosarkomlarda YouTube Güvenilir Bir Bilgi Kaynağı Mı?

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 3, 216 - 225, 28.09.2025

İbrahim Kaya , Yağmur Ekebil Korkut , Resul Bircan , Coşkun Ulucaköy , Özlem Orhan , İsmail Burak Atalay , Mustafa Çeltik

Öz

Amaç: Popüler bir video platformu olan YouTube, kolay erişilebilir olması ve bilgilerin kalitesi ve güvenilirliğinin sorgulanmaması veya izlenmemesi nedeniyle davetkardır ve tıbbi olmayan kişilerin tıbbi bilgileri paylaşmasına olanak tanır. Amacımız, kondrosarkom ile ilgili olarak YouTube'da bulunan İngilizce videoların güvenilirliğini, geçerliliğini ve kapsamlılığını incelemektir.
Yöntemler: Haziran 2024'te YouTube'da "kondrosarkom" terimi için bir arama yapıldı ve alaka düzeyine göre sıralanan en çok izlenen ilk 50 video değerlendirildi. Videolar, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) kriterleri ve YouTube için değiştirilmiş DISCERN kriterleri kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Bu videolarda kondrosarkom tanısı ve tedavisi ile ilgili kapsam puanı da değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: JAMA ile kapsam puanları (r=0,376, p=0,007) arasında, DISCERN ile kapsam puanları (r=0,356, p=0,011) arasında ve JAMA ile DISCERN (r=0,539, p<0,001) arasında orta düzeyde pozitif anlamlı bir korelasyon bulundu. JAMA ile yayıncı (r=-0,299, p=0,035) arasında ve DISCERN ile yayıncı (r=-0,305, p=0,031) arasında düşük düzeyde negatif anlamlı bir korelasyon bulundu. İncelenen 50 videodan 26'sı hekimler tarafından yayınlanmış olmasına rağmen, sadece 2 video JAMA puanlamasında 4 puan aldı. 20 puan üzerinden derecelendirilen 50 videonun ortalama kapsam puanı sadece 5,43'tü.
Sonuç: Kondrosarkom hakkındaki İngilizce YouTube videoları, gerekli etik ve kalite standartlarının altında kalmaktadır. Özellikle çoğunluğu hekimlerden oluşan bir yayıncı grubunda bu düşük puanların gözlemlenmesinin özel bir ilgiyi hak ettiğine inanıyoruz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube , İnternet , kondrosarkom , kondrosarkom tümör

Is YouTube a Reliable Source of Information in Chondrosarcomas?

Öz

Background: YouTube, a widely popular video platform, is inviting due to its easy access, and the quality and reliability of the information are not questioned or monitored, allowing non-medical individuals to share medical information. Our aim is to examine the reliability, validity, and comprehensiveness of English videos available on YouTube regarding chondrosarcoma.
Methods: In June 2024, a search for the term “chondrosarcoma” on YouTube was performed, and the top 50 most viewed videos ranked by relevance were evaluated. Videos were evaluated using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria and modified DISCERN criteria for YouTube. The coverage score regarding the diagnosis and treatment of chondrosarcoma in these videos was also evaluated.
Results: The mean JAMA score was 1.32±1.11, modified DISCERN score was 2.18±1.02, and coverage score was 5.43±2.97. A moderate positive significant correlation was found between the JAMA and coverage scores (r=0.376, p=0.007), as well as between DISCERN and coverage scores (r=0.356, p=0.011) and between JAMA and DISCERN (r=0.539, p<0.001). Among the 50 videos examined, 26 were published by physicians, yet only 2 videos scored 4 points on the JAMA scoring. The mean coverage score for the 50 videos, rated out of 20 points, was only 5.43. No significant effect of whether the publisher was a physician on JAMA, DISCERN and coverage scores was found (p = 0.233, p = 0.690 and p = 1.000, respectively)
Conclusions: English YouTube videos on chondrosarcoma fall below the ethical and quality standards needed. We believe that the observation of these low scores, especially from a predominantly physician publisher population, warrants particular attention.

Anahtar Kelimeler

YouTube , Internet , chondrosarcoma , chondrosarcoma tumor

Kaynakça

• Chow WA. Chondrosarcoma: biology, genetics, and epigenetics. F1000Res. 2018;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1826 Wang M, Song Y, Liu S, Sun W. Effect of surgery and radiotherapy on overall survival in patients with chondrosarcoma: A SEER-based study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022;30(1):10225536221086320.
• Gelderblom H, Hogendoorn PCW, Dijkstra SD, van Rijswijk CS, Krol AD, Taminiau AHM, et al. The clinical approach towards chondrosarcoma. Oncologist. 2008;13(3):320–9.
• Zhao Y, Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Info Libr J. 2017;34(4):268-283.
• Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J. 2015;21(3):173-94.
• Loeb S, Reines K, Abu-Salha Y, French W, Butaney M, Macaluso JN Jr, et al. Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):56-59.
• Loeb S, Sengupta S, Butaney M, Macaluso JN Jr, Czarniecki SW, Robbins R, et al. Dissemination of Misinformative and Biased Information about Prostate Cancer on YouTube. Eur Urol. 2019;75(4):564-567.
• Kim JH, Oh KH, Shin HY, Jun JK. How cancer patients get fake cancer information: From TV to YouTube, a qualitative study focusing on fenbendazole scandle. Front Oncol. 2022;12:942045.
• Shewale R. YouTube Statistics For 2024 (Users, Facts & More). 2024. Available at: https://www.demandsage.com/youtube-stats/#:~:-text=As%20of%202024%2C%20YouTube%20is,in%20the%20world%20access%20YouTube. Accessed 15.10.2024.
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet: CaveantLector et Viewor—Letthe Reader and Viewer Beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244–5.
• Güngörmüş Z, Güngörmüş M. Ağız-Diş Sağlığı İle İlgili Türkçe Web Sayfalarının Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi: Ön Çalışma. SSSJournal. 2018;20:2631-4.
• Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wake up call?. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
• Koller U, Waldstein W, Schatz KD, Windhager R. YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis. Int Orthop. 2016;40(10):1995-2002.
• Orhan Ö, Tekpınar İ, Çetin VB, Kaptan AY AM. Pes ekinovaruslu hastalar için YouTube etik ve kapsamlı bir bilgi kaynağı mı? Dicle Med J. 2022;49(3):491–7.
• Kıvrak A, Ulusoy İ. How high is the quality of the videos about children’s elbow fractures on Youtube? J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):166.
• D’Ambrosi R, Annibaldi A, Carrozzo A, Vieira TD, An J-S, Freychet B, et al. Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions. Orthop J Sport Med. 2024;12(1):23259671231219816.
• Chai BS, Chae T, Huang AL. Evaluation of Educational YouTube Videos for Distal Radius Fracture Treatment. J hand Surg Glob online. 2024;6(3):377–82.
• Etzel CM, Bokshan SL, Forster TA, Owens BD. A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability. Phys Sportsmed. 2022;50(4):289–94.
• Matzko C, Saraf S, Saker C, O’Leary B, Stamm M, Mulcahey MK. Quality Assessment of YouTube Content on SLAP Tears. Phys Sportsmed. 2023;51(6):582–9.
• Kunze KN, Cohn MR, Wakefield C, Hamati F, LaPrade RF, Forsythe B, et al. YouTube as a Source of Information About the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: A Content-Quality and Reliability Analysis. Arthrosc Sport Med Rehabil. 2019;1(2):e109–14.
• Kunze KN, Krivicich LM, Verma NN, Chahla J. Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc North Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2020;36(1):233–8.
• Rudisill SS, Saleh NZ, Hornung AL, Zbeidi S, Ali RM, Siyaji ZK, et al. YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis. Spine Deform. 2023;11(1):3–9.
• Richardson MA, Park W, Bernstein DN, Mesfin A. Analysis of the Quality, Reliability, and Educational Content of YouTube Videos Concerning Spine Tumors. Int J spine Surg. 2022;16(2):278–82.
• Tekin SB, ÖE. Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Bone Tumor on Youtube. Bagcilar Med Bull. 2020;5(3):133–7.
• Biggs TC, Bird JH, Harries PG, Salib RJ. YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127(8):749–54.
• Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a source of patient information on gallstone disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(14):4066–70.
• Chang K, Berthelet E, Grubbs E, Hamilton S, Karvat A, Tran E, et al. Websites, Websites Everywhere: How Thyroid Cancer Patients Use the Internet. J cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2020;35(6):1177–83.
• McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1–2):24–8.
• Tan SS-L, Goonawardene N. Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e9.