Tanrısallıktan Araçsallaştırmaya: Doğanın Tarihi ve Felsefi Portresi

Öz

Bu makale, insan-doğa ilişkisinin tarihsel ve felsefi evrimini incelemektedir. Tarih boyunca, felsefi düşünce, doğanın algılanış biçimini derinden etkilemiş, antik dönemde kutsal bir düzen olarak saygı gören doğa anlayışı, modern çağda araçsallaştırılmaya dönüşmüştür. Platon, Aristoteles, Descartes ve diğer düşünürlerin fikirlerinde açıkça görülen bu dönüşüm, insanlığın doğadan yabancılaşmasını şekillendirmiş ve günümüzdeki ekolojik krizlere katkıda bulunmuştur. Bu çalışma, söz konusu değişimleri tartışmakta ve romantizmin yükselişi ile derin ekoloji, ekofeminizm, sosyal ekoloji ve Gaia hipotezi gibi çağdaş ekolojik felsefeleri incelemektedir. Bu felsefeler, doğanın içsel bir değere sahip olduğu görüşünü benimseyerek, insan varlığını doğal dünyayla uyumlu hale getirme çağrısında bulunmaktadır. Felsefi temellerin ve tarihsel bağlamların analizine dayanarak, makale, ekolojik krizlerle başa çıkmanın insan-doğa ilişkisinin eleştirel bir şekilde yeniden değerlendirilmesini gerektirdiğini savunmaktadır. Çalışma, etik, kültürel ve ekolojik perspektiflerin çağdaş düşünce ve pratiğe entegre edilmesinin gerekliliğini vurgulayarak, doğayla sürdürülebilir ve anlamlı bir birlikteliği teşvik edecek yeni bir entelektüel çerçeve önerisiyle sonuçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• doğa
• felsefe
• insan-doğa ilişkisi
• ekolojik krizler
• sürdürülebilir bir arada yaşama

From Divinity to Instrumentalization: A Historical and Philosophical Portrait of Nature

Öz

This article explores the historical and philosophical evolution of the human-nature relationship. Across history, philosophical thought has profoundly influenced how nature is perceived, transitioning from its reverence as a sacred order in ancient times to its instrumentalization in the modern era. This transformation, evident in the ideas of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, and others, has significantly shaped humanity's alienation from nature and contributed to contemporary ecological crises. The paper discusses these shifts and examines the rise of romanticism and contemporary ecological philosophies—such as deep ecology, ecofeminism, social ecology, and the Gaia hypothesis—that propose reimagining this relationship. These philosophies advocate viewing nature as possessing intrinsic value and call for harmonizing human existence with the natural world. By analyzing philosophical foundations and their historical contexts, the article argues that addressing ecological crises requires a critical reassessment of the human-nature relationship. It concludes by proposing a new intellectual framework to foster sustainable and meaningful coexistence with nature, emphasizing the necessity of integrating ethical, cultural, and ecological perspectives into contemporary thought and practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Nature
• philosophy
• human-nature relationship
• ecological crises
• sustainable coexistence.

Kaynakça

1. Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. Pantheon Books.
2. Altuner, I., & Özkan, F. (2024). Human Nature and Virtue in Plato and Aristotle. Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review, 8(2), 01-22.
3. Amrine, F. (1987). Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal. Springer.
4. Andersen, J. E. (2000). Die Verwitterung des Grundes. Idealistische Romantik bei Fichte und Hölderlin. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 30, 144.
5. Arif, M. (2021). Islam and Ecological Ethics: A Critical Examination. Journal of Religion and Environment, 15(3), 88–105.
6. Azid, T. (2005). The concept and nature of labour in Islam: A survey. Review of Islamic economics, 9(2), 93.
7. Bacon, F. (1855). The Novum Organon; Or, A True Guide to the Interpretation of Nature. Oxford University Press.
8. Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology (3rd ed.). Routledge.

9. Berleant, A. (1992). The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press.
10. Berlin, I. (1999). The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton University Press.
11. Berry, J. A. (2017). What makes us human? Augustine on interiority, exteriority and the self. Scientia et Fides, 5(2), 87-106.
12. Bookchin, M. (1993). What is social ecology? AK Press.
13. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.
14. Briggs, J. C. (1989). Francis Bacon and the rhetoric of nature. Harvard University Press.
15. Brown, L. (2002). Plato and Aristotle. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, 601-618.
16. Buckels, C. (2025). Plato and Aristotle on the Nature of Reality. In The Platonic Mind (pp. 386-399). Routledge.
17. Calverley, E., & Pollock, J. (2022). Nature, Man and God in Medieval Islam: Volume One. Brill.
18. Chappell, T. (2009). “Naturalism” in Aristotle's political philosophy. Ed: Balot, R. K. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, 382-398.
19. Chemuru, R. (2019). African Ecological Knowledge Systems: Cultural Tools for Environmental Sustainability. Environmental Humanities Review, 7(2), 112–128.
20. Clark, J. (1997). A social ecology. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 8(3), 3-33.
21. Close, A. J. (1969). Commonplace theories of art and nature in classical antiquity and in the Renaissance. Journal of the History of Ideas, 30(4), 467-486.
22. Cornford, F. M. (1997). Plato's Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. Hackett Publishing.
23. Cummiskey & Hamilton (2017). Dependent Origination, Emptiness, and the Value of Nature. Journal of Buddhist Ethics, 24 (2017): 1-37.
24. Cunningham, A., & Jardine, N. (1990). Romanticism and the Sciences. CUP Archive.
25. Çilingir, L. (2018). İnsan doğa ilişkisinin etik temeli. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(58), 58-65.
26. Demirhan, E. (2020). Doğa eğitimi programının üstün yetenekli öğrenciler ve öğretmen adaylarının çevreye yönelik tutumlarına ve bilimin doğasına ilişkin anlayışlarına etkisi. Kalem Uluslararası Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1/22): 95-114.
27. Descartes, R. (1637). Discourse on the Method. Hackett Publishing.
28. Dovchin, S., Dovchin, U., & Gower, G. (2024). The discourse of the Anthropocene and posthumanism: Indigenous peoples and local communities. Ethnicities, 24(4), 521-535.
29. Falcon, A. (2020). Aristotle on Causality. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
30. Federici, M. P. (2020). Eric Voegelin and Enlightenment Rationalism. Critics of Enlightenment Rationalism, 211-226.
31. Fine, G. (1990). On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms. Clarendon Press.
32. Garrard, G. (2004). The Romantics' view of nature. In Spirit of the environment (pp. 107-124). Routledge.
33. Gaukroger, S. (2010). The Emergence of a Scientific Culture: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210-1685. Oxford University Press.
34. Grant, E. (1999). God, science, and natural philosophy in the late Middle Ages. In Between Demonstration and Imagination (pp. 243-267). Brill.
35. Gürer, B. (2023). Çevre bilinci, çevresel duyarlılık ve doğaya bağlılık: Öğretmenler üzerine bir inceleme. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3): 349-366.
36. Gürsoy, Ü. (2016). İnsan ve doğa ilişkisi üzerine. Felsefe Dünyası, 1(1), 17-21.
37. Hofstra, N., & Huisingh, D. (2014). Eco-innovations characterized: a taxonomic classification of relationships between humans and nature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 459-468.
38. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1993). Enlightenment Rationality And Nature. Ed: Hoffman, E. Ecology and Reason: Toward a Political Ecology of The Community of Being. University of Hawaii, 177-243.
39. Howles, T., Merritt, J., & Zhao, L. (2018). Ecological Thought in Contemporary Philosophy. Environmental Ethics, 40(2), 213–229.
40. Javid, M. J. (2007). An Introduction to the philosophy of the Nature Rights Man in Islam. J. Islamic L. Resch., 8 (1), 7-32.
41. Johansen, T. K. (2016). Natural Bodies in Plato and Aristotle. Soma [ΣΩΜΑ]: Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur, 455-70.
42. Kahn Jr, P. H., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current directions in psychological science, 18(1), 37-42.
43. Kahn, C. H. (2013). Plato and the Post-Socratic dialogue: the return to the philosophy of nature. Cambridge University Press.
44. Kara, Y. (2020). Speciesism in the context of ecological social work. Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(20): 82-94.
45. Karakurt, E. (2024). Romantizm’den Postmodernizm’e sanatta doğanın tasviri. Journal of Arts, 7(3), 149-160.
46. Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
47. Kirchner, J. W. (1989). The Gaia hypothesis: Can it be tested? Reviews of Geophysics, 27(2), 223-235.
48. Kirchner, J. W. (2002). The Gaia hypothesis: fact, theory, and wishful thinking. Climatic Change, 52: 391-408.
49. Kumar, U. (2024). Deep Ecology and Buddhism: A New Intersection for the Ecological Future of the 21st Century. Journal of Ecology and Natural Resources, 8 (4): 000400.
50. Kyan, T. A. (2023). Ubuntu and Environmental Justice in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Environmental Ethics, 9(1), 55–70.
51. Labio, C. (2004). Origins and the Enlightenment: Aesthetic Epistemology from Descartes to Kant. Cornell University Press.
52. Lee, S. C. (2020). Zhu Xi and Confucian Environmental Ethics. In Dao Companion to Zhu Xi’s Philosophy (pp. 593–612). Springer.
53. Li, X. (2019). Contemporary Interpretation of the Ecological Practice Thought in Tao Te Ching. 7th International Education, Economics, Social Science, Arts, Sports and Management Engineering Conference (IEESASM 2019), 1721 – 1724.
54. Lindberg, D. C., & Numbers, R. L. (Eds.). (1986). God and nature: historical essays on the encounter between Christianity and science (No. 81). Univ of California Press.
55. Lovelock, J. E. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on Earth. Oxford University Press.
56. Luscombe, D. E. (1997). Medieval thought. Oxford University Press, USA.
57. Mamani, C. (2019). Symbolic communication and the notion of "Pachamama" in the Quechua and Aymara cultures. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(2), 620–625.
58. Markus, R. A. (1990). The End of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge University Press.
59. Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Endlicher, W., Alberti, M., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., ... & Simon, U. (2008). An international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. New York, NY: Springer Books Ltd.
60. Maton, K. I. (2000). Making a difference: The social ecology of social transformation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 25-57.
61. Merchant, C. (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. HarperOne.
62. Meynell, H. A. (1998). Redirecting philosophy: Reflections on the nature of knowledge from Plato to Lonergan. University of Toronto Press.
63. Mika, C. (2012). Overcoming 'being' in favour of knowledge: The fixing effect of 'mātauranga'. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(10), 1080–1092.
64. Moran, E. F. (2016). People and nature: An introduction to human ecological relations. John Wiley & Sons.
65. Naess, A. (1973). The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. Inquiry, 16(1-4), 95-100.
66. Naess, A. (2011). The deep ecological movement: Some philosophical aspects. In Ecophilosophy in a World of Crisis (pp. 84-98). Routledge.
67. Nasr, S. H. (2007). Science and Civilization in Islam. Harvard University Press.
68. Nassar, D. (2010). From a Philosophy of Self to a Philosophy of Nature: Goethe and the Development of Schelling's Naturphilosophie. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 92(3), 304-321. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph.2010.014
69. Nightingale, A. (2011). Once out of Nature: Augustine on Time and the Body. University of Chicago Press.
70. Nimmo, R. (2015). Apiculture in the Anthropocene: between posthumanism and critical animal studies. In Animals in the Anthropocene: Critical perspectives on non-human futures (pp. 177-199). Sydney University Press.
71. Nyambi, M., & Otomo, E. (2020). Reclaiming indigenous ecological knowledge: Ubuntu, sustainability, and African philosophy. Journal of African Environmental Studies, 12(3), 144–161.
72. Oerlemans, O. (2024). Reconsidering Romantic Nature in a Time of Crisis. Studies in Literature and Environment, 31(1), 1–17.
73. Osler, M. J. (2010). Reconfiguring the world: nature, God, and human understanding from the Middle Ages to Early Modern Europe. JHU Press.
74. Özdemir, S. İ. (2022). Japonların Doğa Algısı Problemi̇ ve Shizen’i̇n Anlamları. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 53: 103 – 123.
75. Özen, S. (2018). Literature Kentten Doğaya Dönüş: Edebiyatta Doğadaki “Yabancılar”. Sociology & Phılosophy, 26, 95-102.
76. Pesic, P. (1999). Wrestling with Proteus: Francis Bacon and the" torture" of nature. Isis, 90(1), 81-94. Pierotti, R., & Wildcat, D. (2000). Traditional ecological knowledge: The third alternative (commentary). Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1333–1340.
77. Puleo, A. H. (2017). What is ecofeminism. Quaderns de la Mediterrània, 25 (1), 27-34.
78. Reyes-García, V., & Fernández-Llamazares, Á. (2019). Indigenous knowledge and conservation: a review of current debates and future directions. Oryx, 53(1), 14–23.
79. Roberts, R. H. (2004). 'Nature', Post/Modernity and the Migration of the Sublime. Ecotheology: Journal of Religion, Nature & the Environment, 9(3), 315-337.
80. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Emile, or On Education. Basic Books.
81. Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R. K., Basurto, X., Chan, K. M., ... & Tam, J. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual review of environment and resources, 38(1), 473-502.
82. Schouls, P. A. (1989). Descartes and the Enlightenment. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
83. Schroeder, H. W. (2007). Place experience, gestalt, and the human–nature relationship. Journal of environmental psychology, 27(4), 293-309.
84. Schummer, J. (2001). Aristotle on technology and nature. Philosophia naturalis, 38(1), 105-20.
85. Sessions, G. (1987). The deep ecology movement: A review. Environmental review, 11(2), 105-125.
86. Shiva, V. (1988). Staying Alive: Women, Ecology, and Development. Zed Books.
87. Shiva, V., & Mies, M. (2014). Ecofeminism. Bloomsbury Publishing.
88. Smith, N. D. (1983). Plato and Aristotle on the Nature of Women. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 21(4), 467-478.
89. Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2020). The ecology of human–nature interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1918), 20191882.
90. Stonehouse, L. P., Allison, P., & Carr, D. (2011). Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates: Ancient Greek perspectives on experiential learning. In Sourcebook of experiential education (pp. 32-39). Routledge.
91. Tănăsescu, M. (2020). Rights of nature, legal personality, and Indigenous philosophies. Transnational Environmental Law, 9(3), 429–453.
92. Tantillo, A. O. (2002). The will to create: Goethe's philosophy of nature. University of Pittsburgh Pre.
93. Tu, W. (2001). The Ecological Turn in New Confucian Humanism: Implications for China and the World. Dædalus, 130(4), 243–264.
94. Weeks, S. (2007). Francis Bacon and the art–nature distinction. Ambix, 54(2), 117-145.
95. Wordsworth, W. (1798). Lines Written a Few Miles Above Tintern Abbey. Lyrical Ballads.