Uçakların Kuru Yıkaması: Aerodinamik Performans, Kontaminasyon Kontrolü ve Çevresel Etkilerin Teknik Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışma, kuru ve ıslak uçak yıkama yöntemlerini aerodinamik performans, kontaminasyon kontrolü ve çevresel etkiler açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın önemi, havacılık endüstrisinde giderek artan sürdürülebilirlik gereksinimleri ile sınırlı su kaynaklarının verimli kullanımına yönelik ihtiyacın artmasından kaynaklanmaktadır. Bu kapsamda çalışma, yalnızca kuru ve ıslak yıkama yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Metodolojik yaklaşım olarak mevcut akademik literatür ve endüstriyel uygulamalar temel alınarak nitel risk analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, her iki yöntemin de yüzey pürüzlülüğünü azaltarak aerodinamik performansı iyileştirdiğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, kuru yıkama yöntemlerinin yeniden kirlenmeyi geciktirmesi nedeniyle uzun dönem operasyonel performans açısından avantaj sağladığı belirlenmiştir. Çevresel açıdan değerlendirildiğinde ise ıslak yıkama yönteminin yüksek su tüketimi ve atık su oluşumu nedeniyle dezavantajlı olduğu, kuru yıkama yöntemlerinin ise çevresel yükü önemli ölçüde azalttığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, tüm operasyonel koşullar için tek bir temizleme yönteminin yeterli olmadığı, aerodinamik performans ve çevresel sürdürülebilirlik açısından hibrit temizleme stratejilerinin daha etkin bir çözüm sunduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Uçak Temizliği
• Kuru Yıkama
• Islak Yıkama
• Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü
• Laminer Akış
• Sürdürülebilir Havacılık
• Çevresel Etki
• Risk Analizi

Dry Washing of Aircraft: A Technical Analysis of Aerodynamic Performance, Contamination Control and Environmental Impacts

Öz

This study aims to comparatively evaluate dry and wet aircraft washing methods in terms of aerodynamic performance, contamination control, and environmental impacts. The significance of the study arises from the increasing sustainability requirements in the aviation industry and the growing need for the efficient utilization of limited water resources. Within this scope, the study is limited to the comparison of dry and wet washing methods only. As a methodological approach, a qualitative risk analysis was conducted based on existing academic literature and industrial practices. The findings indicate that both methods improve aerodynamic performance by reducing surface roughness; however, dry washing methods provide an advantage in long-term operational performance by delaying recontamination. From an environmental perspective, wet washing was identified as disadvantageous due to its high water consumption and wastewater generation, whereas dry washing methods were found to significantly reduce environmental burden. Consequently, it was concluded that a single cleaning method is insufficient for all operational conditions and that hybrid cleaning strategies offer a more effective solution in terms of both aerodynamic performance and environmental sustainability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aircraft Cleaning
• Dry Washing
• Wet Washing
• Surface Roughness
• Laminar Flow
• Sustainable Aviation
• Environmental Impact
• Risk Analysis

Kaynakça

1. Chen, D., & Sun, J. (2018). Fuel and emission reduction assessment for civil aircraft engine fleet on-wing washing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.05.013
2. Croom, C. C., & Holmes, B. J. (1986). Insect contamination protection for laminar flow surfaces. In Langley Symposium on Aerodynamics (Vol. 1, pp. 539–556). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19880005572
3. Cui, Z., Zhong, S., & Yan, Z. (2020). Fuel savings model after aero-engine washing based on convolutional neural network prediction. Measurement, 151, Article 107180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107180
4. International Civil Aviation Organization. (2019). Water management at airports. https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/environmental-protection/Documents/Water-management-at-airports.pdf
5. Joslin, R. D. (1998). Aircraft laminar flow control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 30, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.1
6. Kok, M., Mertens, T., Raps, D., & Young, T. M. (2013). Influence of surface characteristics on insect residue adhesion to aircraft leading edge surfaces. Progress in Organic Coatings, 76(11), 1567–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.06.013
7. Kok, T., Habermann, H., & Wahls, M. (2015). Environmental benefits of laminar flow technology in commercial aviation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 72, 1–16.
8. Koščák, P., Berežný, Š., Vajdová, I., Koblen, I., Ojciec, M., Matisková, D., & Puškáš, T. (2020). Reducing the Negative Environmental Impact of Winter Airport Maintenance through Its Model Design and Simulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041296

9. Krishnan, K. G., Milionis, A., Loth, E., Farrell, T. E., Crouch, J. D., & Berry, D. H. (2017). Influence of hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces on reducing aerodynamic insect residues. Applied Surface Science, 392, 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.096
10. Lachmann, G. V. (Ed.). (1961). Boundary layer and flow control: Its principles and application (Vol. 2). Pergamon Press.
11. Liu, Y.-H., Maruyama, H., & Matsusaka, S. (2011). Effect of particle impact on surface cleaning using dry ice jet. Aerosol Science and Technology, 45(12), 1519–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2011.603769
12. Longmuir, M., & Ahmed, N. A. (2009). Commercial aircraft exterior cleaning optimization. Journal of Aircraft, 46(1), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.38472
13. Nosonovsky, M., & Bhushan, B. (2009). Superhydrophobic surfaces and emerging applications: Non-adhesion, energy, green engineering. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 14(4), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2009.05.004
14. Pressl, A., Pucher, B., Scharf, B., & Langergraber, G. (2019). Treatment of de-icing contaminated surface water runoff along an airport runway using in-situ soil enriched with structural filter materials. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.440
15. Rahn, A., Schuch, M., Wicke, K., Sprecher, B., Dransfeld, C., & Wende, G. (2024). Beyond flight operations: Assessing the environmental impact of aircraft maintenance through life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 453, Article 142195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142195
16. Ren, Y., Wang, L., Li, J., Cheng, W., & Ma, X. (2022). The surface properties of an aviation aluminum alloy after laser cleaning. Coatings, 12(2), Article 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12020273
17. Rodrigues, F. L., Oliveira Neto, G. C., Tucci, H. N. P., Pinto, L. F. R., & Facchini, F. (2025). Evaluation of the operational, economic, and environmental benefits of adopting blue economy in the change of aircraft engine washing process: A case study. Engineering Reports, 7(6), Article e70226. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70226
18. Schlichting, H., & Gersten, K. (2017). Boundary-layer theory (9th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52919-5
19. Spur, G., Uhlmann, E., & Elbing, F. (1999). Dry-ice blasting for cleaning: Process, optimization and application. Wear, 233–235, 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00204-5
20. Sulej-Suchomska, A. M., Przybyłowski, P., & Polkowska, Ż. (2021). Potential Toxic Effects of Airport Runoff Water Samples on the Environment. Sustainability, 13(13), 7490. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137490
21. Sulej-Suchomska, A. M., Szumińska, D., de la Guardia, M., Przybyłowski, P., & Polkowska, Ż. (2024). Airport runoff water: State-of-the-art and future perspectives. Sustainability, 16(18), Article 8176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188176
22. Young, T. M., & Humphreys, B. (2004). Liquid anti-contamination systems for hybrid laminar flow control aircraft—A review of the critical issues and important experimental results. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 218(4), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954410041872825