Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Gülben Çolak; Muhittin Uğurlu

Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Restoratif diş hekimliğinde güncel tedavi yöntemleri ve materyaller geliştirilmektedir. Ancak birçok tedavi yaklaşımı iyi kanıtlarla desteklenmeği için hekimlerin tedavi yöntemi tercihinde kararsızlığa neden olmaktadır. Bu tedavi yaklaşımlardan biri; rubber-dam izolasyonudur. Bu uygulamanın avantajları ve dezavantajları vardır. Çürük dentinin tamamen uzaklaştırılması diş yapısına zarar verdiği ve geri dönüşü olmayan sonuçlara neden olduğu için, günümüzde çürük dentinin selektif ya da aşamalı uzaklaştırılması savunulmaktadır. Dentinin örtülenmesi, mikrosızıntıyı ve post-operatif hassasiyeti azaltması nedeniyle uygulanması gereken bir yaklaşım olarak görülse de bağlanma için gerekli yüzey alanını ve restoratif materyalin kalınlığını azaltması sonucu restorasyonun biyomekanik özelliklerini olumsuz etkilemesi nedeniyle önerilmemektedir. Kanal tedavili dişlerin restorasyonunda, kalan diş yapısı miktarı direkt/indirekt restorasyon tercihinde önemli bir faktördür. Ayrıca, ferrule varlığı ve post kullanımı restorasyonun başarısını etkilemektedir. Post kullanımının olumsuz etkileri de vardır. Beyazlatma tedavileri ev tipi, ofis tipi ve ikisinin kombinasyonu olarak sınıflandırılmaktadır. Hekim hangi beyazlatma yöntemini uygulayacağına dişteki renklenmenin derecesi, kullanılan ajanın konsantrasyonu ve hasta-hekim uyumu gibi faktörlerin sonucunda karar vermelidir. Dentin hassasiyeti sıklıkla karşılaşılan ağrılı bir durumdur. Dentin hassasiyeti tedavilerinin amacı dış uyaranları ortadan kaldırarak, dentin tübüllerini tıkayarak ve sinirsel iletimi önleyerek ağrıyı azaltmaktır. Bu derlemenin amacı, bu tedavi yaklaşımlarını inceleyip, avantajlarını ve dezavantajlarını kanıta dayalı bir şekilde sunarak hekimlere bilgi vermektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Atak D, Aksoy M. Evidence-Based Dentistry Practices: Traditional Review. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 2022;28(1):203-11.
Kadri G, Enejjari Z, Bouziane A. Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards Evidence-Based-Dentistry regarding dental practitioner: A cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;81:104289.
Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Bonding Parameters on the Clinical Outcome of Tooth-colored Cervical Restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(5):391-403.
Miao C, Yang X, Wong MC, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;5(5).
Cajazeira MR, De Sabóia TM, Maia LC. Influence of the operatory field isolation technique on tooth-colored direct dental restorations. Am J Dent. 2014;27(3):155- 159.
Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(5):407-431.
Carvalho TS, Sampaio FC, Diniz A, Bönecker M, Van Amerongen WE. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010;20(6):419-425.
Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a metaanalysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31(5):481-495.

Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, et al. Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Carious Tissue Removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):58-67.
Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(3):CD003808.
Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Paris S. Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and metaanalysis [published correction appears in J Dent Res. 2013;92(8):759.
Hoefler V, Nagaoka H, Miller CS. Long-term survival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth following deep caries treatment with step-wise and partial-cariesremoval: A Systematic Review. J Dent. 2016;54:25-32.
Briso AL, Mestrener SR, Delício G, et al. Clinical assessment of postoperative sensitivity in posterior composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2007;32(5):421- 426.
Schenkel AB, Peltz I, Veitz-Keenan A. Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10(10).
Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithiumdisilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2016;32(4):e73-e81.
Mazzoni A, Scaffa P, Carrilho M, Tjäderhane L, Di Lenarda R, Polimeni A, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Breschi L. Effects of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives on dentin MMP-2 and MMP-9. J Dent Res. 2013;92(1):82-6.
Blum IR, Younis N, Wilson NH. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK. J Dent.2017;57:66-72.
Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations [published correction appears in J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(10):1387-1398.
Blum IR, Wilson NHF. Consequences of no more linings under composite restorations. Br Dent J. 2019;226(10):749-752.
Torres CRG, Mailart MC, Rocha RS, et al. The influence of a liner on deep bulk-fill restorations: Randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2020;102:103454.
Albar NH. Efficacy of GLUMA for the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity Compared to Lasers: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23(10):1057-1065.
de Oliveira ILM, Hanzen TA, de Paula AM, et al. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehydebased desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2022;117:103918.
de Souza LC, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA, et al. Twoyear clinical evaluation of a proanthocyanidins-based primer in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2020;96:103325.
Coelho A, Amaro I, Rascão B, et al. Effect of Cavity Disinfectants on Dentin Bond Strength and Clinical Success of Composite Restorations-A Systematic Review of In Vitro, In Situ and Clinical Studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22(1):353.
Hajizadeh H, Ghavamnasiri M, Majidinia S. Randomized clinical evaluation of the effect of chlorhexidine on postoperative sensitivity of posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(10):793-798.
Favetti M, Schroeder T, Montagner AF, Correa MB, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Effectiveness of pretreatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: A 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2017;60:44-49.
Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Sarafianou A, Kourtis S. Immediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021;13:233-256.
Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(4):240-249.
van den Breemer CRG, Cune MS,et.al. Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function. J Dent. 2019;85:1-10.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(9): CD009109.
Cloet E, Debels E, Naert I. Controlled Clinical Trial on the Outcome of Glass Fiber Composite Cores Versus Wrought Posts and Cast Cores for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A 5-Year Follow-up Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(1):71-79. Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Mechanical properties, fracture resistance, and fatigue limits of short fiber reinforced dental composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):95-102.
Naumann M, Schmitter M, Frankenberger R, Krastl G. “Ferrule Comes First. Post Is Second!” Fake News and Alternative Facts? A Systematic Review. J Endod. 2018;44(2):212-219.
Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects the survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res. 2007;86(8):729-734.
Afrashtehfar KI, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2017;50(10):951-966.
Batista VES, Bitencourt SB, Bastos NA, Pellizzer EP, Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM. Influence of the ferrule effect on the failure of fiber-reinforced composite postand- core restorations: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(2):239.
Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Kreulen CM, Huysmans MC, Pereira-Cenci T. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2016;48:34-39.
Schwendicke F, Stolpe M. Restoring root-canal treated molars: Cost-effectiveness-analysis of direct versus indirect restorations. J Dent. 2018;77:37-42.
Schmitter M, Hamadi K, Rammelsberg P. Survival of two post systems--five-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(10):843-850.
Bernardon JK, Sartori N, Ballarin A, Perdigão J, Lopes GC, Baratieri LN. Clinical performance of vital bleaching techniques. Oper Dent. 2010;35(1):3-10.
He LB, Shao MY, Tan K, Xu X, Li JY. The effects of light on bleaching and tooth sensitivity during in-office vital bleaching: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent.2012;40:644–653.
Maran BM, Burey A, de Paris Matos T, Loguercio AD, Reis A. In-office dental bleaching with light vs. without light: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;70:1-13.
SoutoMaior JR, de Moraes S, Lemos C, Vasconcelos BDE, Montes M, Pellizzer EP. Effectiveness of Light Sources on In-Office Dental Bleaching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Oper Dent. 2019;44(3):E105-E117.
Maran BM, Ziegelmann PK, Burey A, de Paris Matos T, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Different light-activation systems associated with dental bleaching: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(4):1499-1512.
Boushell LW, Ritter AV, Garland GE, et al. Nightguard vital bleaching: side effects and patient satisfaction 10 to 17 years post-treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(3):211-219.
Matis BA, Cochran MA, Wang G, Eckert GJ. A clinical evaluation of two in-office bleaching regimens with and without tray bleaching. Oper Dent. 2009;34(2):142-149.
Matis BA, Cochran MA, Eckert G. Review of the effectiveness of various tooth whitening systems. Oper Dent. 2009;34(2):230-235.
Bizhang M, Chun YH, Damerau K, Singh P, Raab WH, Zimmer S. Comparative clinical study of the effectiveness of three different bleaching methods. Oper Dent. 2009;34(6):635-641.
Cardenas AFM, Maran BM, Araújo LCR, et al. Are combined bleaching techniques better than their sole application? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(10):3673-3689.
Vaez SC, Correia A, Santana TR, et al. Is a Single Preliminary Session of In-office Bleaching Beneficial for the Effectiveness of At-home Tooth Bleaching? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):E180-E189.
Eachempati P, Kumbargere Nagraj S, Kiran Kumar Krishanappa S, Gupta P, Yaylali IE. Home-based chemically-induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12(12):CD006202.
de Geus JL, Wambier LM, Boing TF, Loguercio AD, Reis A. At-home Bleaching With 10% vs More Concentrated Carbamide Peroxide Gels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2018;43(4):E210-E222. doi:10.2341/17-222-L.
Maran BM, Matos TP, de Castro ADS, et al. In-office bleaching with low/medium vs. high concentrate hydrogen peroxide: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Dent. 2020;103:103499.
Pontes M, Gomes J, Lemos C, et al. Effect of Bleaching Gel Concentration on Tooth Color and Sensitivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):265-275.
Rezende M, Loguercio AD, Kossatz S, Reis A. Predictive factors on the efficacy and risk/intensity of tooth sensitivity of dental bleaching: A multi regression and logistic analysis. J Dent. 2016;45:1-6.
Shiau H. Dentin hypersensitivity. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012; 12(3 Suppl): 220- 228.
Hong JY, Lim HC, Herr Y. Effects of a mouthwash containing potassium nitrate, sodium fluoride, and cetylpyridinium chloride on dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016; 46(1): 46- 56.
Petersson LG. The role of fluoride in the preventive management of dentin hypersensitivity and root caries. Clinical Ora Investig. 2013; 17(S1): 63– 71.
Ishihata H, Finger WJ, Kanehira M, Shimauchi H, Komatsu M. In vitro dentin permeability after application of Gluma® desensitizer as an aqueous solution or aqueous fumed silica dispersion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19(2): 147- 153.
Marto CM, Baptista Paula A, Nunes T, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of dentin hypersensitivity treatments-A systematic review and follow-up analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(10):952-990.
Machado AC, Viana ÍEL, Farias-Neto AM, et al. Is photobiomodulation (PBM) effective for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2018; 33(4): 745- 753.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Restoratif Diş Tedavisi

Bölüm

Derleme

Yazarlar

Gülben Çolak
0000-0003-0786-9609
Türkiye

Muhittin Uğurlu ^*
0000-0002-8900-7449
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Nisan 2024

Gönderilme Tarihi

3 Temmuz 2023

Kabul Tarihi

18 Eylül 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2024 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Çolak, G., & Uğurlu, M. (2024). Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydın Dental Journal, 10(1), 47-56. https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA

AMA

1.Çolak G, Uğurlu M. Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydin Dental Journal. 2024;10(1):47-56. https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA

Chicago

Çolak, Gülben, ve Muhittin Uğurlu. 2024. “Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi”. Aydın Dental Journal 10 (1): 47-56. https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA.

EndNote

Çolak G, Uğurlu M (01 Nisan 2024) Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydın Dental Journal 10 1 47–56.

IEEE

[1]G. Çolak ve M. Uğurlu, “Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi”, Aydin Dental Journal, c. 10, sy 1, ss. 47–56, Nis. 2024, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA

ISNAD

Çolak, Gülben - Uğurlu, Muhittin. “Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi”. Aydın Dental Journal 10/1 (01 Nisan 2024): 47-56. https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA.

JAMA

1.Çolak G, Uğurlu M. Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydin Dental Journal. 2024;10:47–56.

MLA

Çolak, Gülben, ve Muhittin Uğurlu. “Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi”. Aydın Dental Journal, c. 10, sy 1, Nisan 2024, ss. 47-56, https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA.

Vancouver

1.Gülben Çolak, Muhittin Uğurlu. Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Güncel Tedavi Yaklaşımlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Aydin Dental Journal [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2024;10(1):47-56. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA25TC89LA