Olgu Sunumu

TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 1 Ekim 2020
  • Muhammed Gürcan *
  • Nourtzan Kechagıa
  • Burcu Ece Koru
  • Sanaz Sadry
PDF İndir
TR EN

TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT

Öz

The aim of this case report presents a case of skeletal II and dental Class II treated with functional appliance in a male patient with increased openbite. A 9-year-old male patient was admitted to our clinic with gaping of anterior teeth. Clinical and radiographic evaluation revealed skeletal class II and dental class II anomaly and increased openbite due to mandibular retrognathia. The treatment was started with rapid maxillary expansion. After the retention period of 6 months, the treatment was continued with activator appliance to correct mandibular retrognathia. Mandibular advancement and class I molar and canine relationship were achieved after 10 months of activator use. In conclusion, in the case of dental class II, increased overjet, rapid maxillary expansion and functional treatment with activator appliance resulted in a good occlusion with normal overbite and overjet with dental class I relationships.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. 1. W. R. Proffit, H. W. Fields Jr., and L. J. Moray, “Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES-III survey,” The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 1998.
  2. 2. M. Alarashi, L. Franchi, A. Marinelli, and E. Defraia, “Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 21– 25, 2003.
  3. 3. Martina R, Cioffi I, Galeotti A, et al. Efficacy of the Sander bitejumping appliance in growing patients with mandibular retrusion.
  4. 4. Shen G, Hägg U, Darendeliler M. Skeletal effects of bite jumping therapy on the mandible - removable vs. fixed functional appliances. Orthod Craniofac Res 2005; 8: 2-10.
  5. 5. Graber TM, Swain BF. Orthodontics. Current principles and techniques. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. Buschang PH, Sankey W, English JD. Early treatment of hyperdivergent openbite malocclusions. Semin Orthod. 2002;8(3):130–140. [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. Henriques JFC, Martins DR, Almeida GA, Ursi WJS. Modified maxillary splint for Class II, division 1 treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1991;25(4):239–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. Stuani MBS, Stuani AS, Stuani AS. Modified Thurow appliance: a clinical alternative for correcting skeletal open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(1):118–

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Olgu Sunumu

Yazarlar

Muhammed Gürcan * Bu kişi benim
0000-0003-3700-9167
Türkiye

Nourtzan Kechagıa Bu kişi benim
0000-0001-9572-5829
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Ekim 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Aralık 2019

Kabul Tarihi

3 Şubat 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Gürcan, M., Kechagıa, N., Koru, B. E., & Sadry, S. (2020). TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydın Dental Journal, 6(2), 65-70. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF
AMA
1.Gürcan M, Kechagıa N, Koru BE, Sadry S. TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydin Dental Journal. 2020;6(2):65-70. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF
Chicago
Gürcan, Muhammed, Nourtzan Kechagıa, Burcu Ece Koru, ve Sanaz Sadry. 2020. “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”. Aydın Dental Journal 6 (2): 65-70. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF.
EndNote
Gürcan M, Kechagıa N, Koru BE, Sadry S (01 Ekim 2020) TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydın Dental Journal 6 2 65–70.
IEEE
[1]M. Gürcan, N. Kechagıa, B. E. Koru, ve S. Sadry, “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”, Aydin Dental Journal, c. 6, sy 2, ss. 65–70, Eki. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF
ISNAD
Gürcan, Muhammed - Kechagıa, Nourtzan - Koru, Burcu Ece - Sadry, Sanaz. “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”. Aydın Dental Journal 6/2 (01 Ekim 2020): 65-70. https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF.
JAMA
1.Gürcan M, Kechagıa N, Koru BE, Sadry S. TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydin Dental Journal. 2020;6:65–70.
MLA
Gürcan, Muhammed, vd. “TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT”. Aydın Dental Journal, c. 6, sy 2, Ekim 2020, ss. 65-70, https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF.
Vancouver
1.Muhammed Gürcan, Nourtzan Kechagıa, Burcu Ece Koru, Sanaz Sadry. TREATMENT OF SKELETAL CLASS II DIVISION OPENBITE MALOCCLUSION WITH RME AND ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES: A CASE REPORT. Aydin Dental Journal [Internet]. 01 Ekim 2020;6(2):65-70. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA62TZ49ZF

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)