GENEL ANESTEZİ ALTINDA YAPILAN DENTAL TEDAVİLERİN UZUN DÖNEM BAŞARI ORANLARI

Öz

Kooperasyon güçlüğü yaşanan çocuklarda ve zihinsel ve fiziksel engelli bireylerde dental tedavilerin genel anestezi altında gerçekleştirilmesi, tedavi sürecini oldukça kolaylaştırmaktadır. Klinikte uygulanan tedavi protokolüyle genel anestezi altında yapılan tedavi planlaması birbirinden farklı olabilir. Genel anestezi altında yapılan dental tedavinin başarısızlık riskinin en aza indirilmesi ve tedavi planlamasının doğru yapılması oldukça önemlidir. Tedavi protokolü oluşturulurken daha önce erken çocukluk çağı çürüklerinin dental tedavisi, farklı restorasyon materyalleri, engelli bireylerin dental tedavisi, tek seansta yapılan endodontik tedavi ile ilgili yapılmış çalışmalardan yararlanılmalı ve tedavilerin bildirilen uzun dönem başarı oranları dikkate alınmalıdır. Ayrıca, yüksek çürük riski grubundaki hastalarda dental tedavi sonrası tekrarlayan çürük lezyonlarına dair bir eğilim görülmektedir. Çocuk diş hekimleri sadece dental tedaviye odaklanmamalı, aynı zamanda oral hijyen eğitiminin verilmesi ve genel anestezi sonrasında düzenli kontrol randevuları ile oral hijyenin idame ettirilmesi konusunda da dikkatli olmalıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Genel anestezi
• Erken çocukluk çağı çürükleri
• Kompozit restorasyonlar
• Paslanmaz çelik kron
• Tek seans endodontik tedavi
• Pulpotomi
• Sekonder çürük

LONG-TERM SUCCESS RATES OF DENTAL TREATMENTS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Öz

Performing dental treatments under general anesthesia in children with impaired cooperation or mentally and physically disabled patients facilitates the treatment process considerably. Clinical treatment protocol and the planning under general anesthesia may differ from each other. It is very important to minimize the risk of failure of dental treatment under general anesthesia and to plan the dental treatment correctly. While preparing treatment protocol, studies on the dental treatment of early childhood caries, different restoration materials, dental treatment of disabled individuals, endodontic treatment in single visit should be utilized and reported longterm success rates of treatments should be taken into consideration. In addition, there is a trend for recurrent caries after dental treatment in patients at high risk of caries. Pediatric dentists should not only focus on dental treatment, but should also be careful in providing oral hygiene training and maintaining oral hygiene through regular check-up appointments after general anesthesia.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Koch G, Poulsen S. Çocuk Diş Hekimliğine Klinik Yaklaşım. 2nd Edition. New York: Gamze Aren, 2013: 58.
2. 2. Mallineni SK, Yiu CK. A retrospective review of outcomes of dental treatment performed for special needs patients under general anaesthesia: 2-year follow-up. The Scientific World Journal, 2014; 2014: 748353.
3. 3. Alsaleh I, Cousson P-Y, Nicolas E, Hennequin M. Is endodontic treatment performed under general anaesthesia technically acceptable? Clin Oral Invest, 2012; 16: 1599–1606.
4. 4. Jiang H, Shen L, Qin D, He S, Wang J. Effects of dental general anaesthesia treatment on early childhood caries: a prospective cohort study in China. BMJ Open, 2019: 9(9); 1-11.
5. 5. Foster T, Perinpanayagam H, Pfaffenbach A, et al. Recurrence of early childhood caries after comprehensive treatment with general anesthesia and follow-up. J Dent Child, 2006; 73: 25-30.
6. 6. Bücher K, Tautz A, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Longevity of composite restorations in patients with early childhood caries (ECC). Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18(3): 775-782.
7. 7. Fayle SA, Welbury RR, Roberts JF, British Society of Pediatric Dentistry. British society of pediatric dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2001; 11(2): 153–157.
8. 8. Kandiah T, Johnson J, Fayle SA, British Society of Pediatric Dentistry. British society of pediatric dentistry: a policy document on management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent, 2010; 20(1): 5.

9. 9. Finucane D. Rationale for restoration of carious primary teeth: a review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2012; 13: 281–292.
10. 10. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent, 2005; 27: 221–225.
11. 11. Yaseen SM, Subba Reddy VV. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two self -etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on dentin of primary and permanent teeth: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 2009; 27: 33-38.
12. 12. Sawant A, Chunawalla Y, Morawala A, et al. Evaluation of novel glass fiberreinforced composite technique for primary anterior teeth with deep carious lesions: A 12-month clinical study. Int J Clin Pediatr
13. 13. Schüler IM, Hiller M, Roloff T, Kühnisch J, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical success of stainless steel crowns placed under general anaesthesia in primary molars: An observational follow up study. J Dent. 2014; 42(11): 1396-1403.
14. 14. Buerkle V, Kuehnisch J, Guelmann M, Hickel R. Restoration materials for primary molars – results from a European survey. Journal of Dentistry, 2005; 33: 275-281.
15. 15. Thelfall AG, Pikington L, Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS, Tickle M. General dental practitioners’ view on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars. British Dental Journal, 2005; 199: 453– 455.
16. 16. AAPD. Clinical Affairs Committee – Restorative Dentistry Subcommittee. Guideline on pediatric restorative dentistry. Reference manual. Journal of Dentistry, 2012; 34:214–221.
17. 17. Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle SA. UK National Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: stainless steel crowns for primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2008; 18: 20–28.
18. 18. Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: pulp therapy for primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2006; 16: 15–23.
19. 19. Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2006; 7: 58–63.
20. 20. Roberts JF, Attari N, Sherriff M. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice. British Dental Journal, 2005; 198: 427–431.
21. 21. Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified opensandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 2008; 18: 325–332.
22. 22. Randall C. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature. Pediatric Dentistry, 2002; 24: 489–500.
23. 23. Anders PL, Davis EL. Oral health of patients with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Spec Care Dentist, 2010; 30: 110- 117.
24. 24. Glassman P, Miller CE. Preventing dental disease for people with special needs: the need for practical preventive protocols for use in community settings. Spec Care Dentist, 2003; 23: 165–167.
25. 25. Chang J, Kim HY. Prognostic factors of single-visit endodontic and restorative treatment under general anaesthesia for special needs patients. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2017; 44(2): 96-104.
26. 26. Chang J, Patton LL, Kim HY. Impact of dental treatment under general anesthesia on the oral health-related quality of life of adolescents and adults with special needs. Eur J Oral Sci. 2014; 122: 363–371.
27. 27. Chung SH, Chun KA, Kim HY, Kim YS, Chang J. Periapical Healing in Single-visit Endodontics under General Anesthesia in Special Needs Patients. J Endod. 2019;45(2): 116-122. 28. He J, White RK, White CA, Schweitzer JL, Woodmansey KF. Clinical and Patientcentered Outcomes of Nonsurgical Root Canal Retreatment in First Molars Using Contemporary Techniques. J Endod. 2017; 43(2): 231-237.
28. 29. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2010; 43: 171–189.
29. 30. Cousson PY, Nicolas E, Hennequin M. A follow-up study of pulpotomies and root canal treatments performed under general anaesthesia. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18(4): 1155-1163.
30. 31. Guelzow A, Stamm O, Martus P, Kielbassa AM. Comparative study of six rotary nickeltitanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation. Int Endod J, 2005; 38: 743–752.
31. 32. Janner SFM, Jeger FB, Lussi A, Bornstein MM. Precision of endodontic working length measurements: a pilot investigation comparing cone-beam computed tomography scanning with standard measurement techniques. J Endod, 2011; 37: 1046–1051.
32. 33. Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod, 2010; 36: 1753– 1756.
33. 34. Amin MS, Bedard D, Gamble J. Early childhood caries: recurrence after comprehensive dental treatment under general anaesthesia. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2010; 11: 269-273.
34. 35. Amin M, Nouri R, ElSalhy M, et al. Caries recurrence after treatment under general anaesthesia for early childhood caries: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2015; 16: 325-331.