MUTAGENIC POTENTIAL OF A SELF-ADHESIVE FLOWABLE COMPOSITE

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 9 - 15, 01.10.2016

Tuğba Toz Zeliha Aydoğan Duygu Tuncer Emel Karaman

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the
potential mutagenic effects associated to extracts from
current self-adhesive flowable resin composite (Vertise
Flow,Kerr Corp, Orange, CA, USA) that allows
skipping the time-consuming adhesive processes.
Study design: The materials were eluted in dimethyl
sulphoxide and the extracts were tested either after 1
day or 7 day incubation period at 370C. Mutagenic
effects of the materials were tested on Salmonella
typhipmurium strain TA 100 using the standard plate
incorporation assay in the absence of S9 fraction from
rat liver. The data were statistically analyzed using twoway
variance analysis (p<0.05).
Results: The dose of the material and incubation as
well as the interactions between these factors exhibited
varying degrees of influences on the Salmonella
typhipmurium colony number. However no mutagenic
effect was detected for the self-adhesive restorative
material.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the adhesive
restorative material tested in this study has no mutagenic
potential.

Anahtar Kelimeler

mutagenicity, AMES test, Salmonella tphymiruim, self-adhesive composite, bulk fill flowables, adhesive resin

Kaynakça

• Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2007;9(1):7-10.
• Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Suyama Y, Mine A, Peumans M, et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive composites to dentin and enamel. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2013;29(2):221-30.
• Fu J, Kakuda S, Pan F, Hoshika S, Ting S, Fukuoka A, et al. Bonding performance of a newly developed step-less all-in-one system on dentin. Dental materials journal. 2013;32(2):203-11.
• Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of a self-adhesive and four novel flowable composites. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2013;15(3):229-36.
• Eliades A, Birpou E, Eliades T, Eliades G. Self- adhesive restoratives as pit and fissure sealants: a comparative laboratory study. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2013;29(7):752-62.
• Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf MJ, Naumann M, Taschner M. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch? The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2008;10(5):339-44.
• Malkoc S, Corekci B, Ulker HE, Yalcin M, Sengun A. Cytotoxic effects of orthodontic composites. 2010;80(4):571-6. orthodontist.
• Mortelmans K, Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella/ microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutation research. 2000;455(1-2):29-60.
• Dean BJ, Brooks TM, Hodson-Walker G, Hutson DH. Genetic toxicology testing of 41 industrial chemicals. Mutation research. 1985;153(1-2):57-77.
• Maron DM, Ames BN. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutation research. 1983;113(3-4):173-215.
• Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. Journal of dental research. 2006;85(10):870-7.
• Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, Ciucchi B, Holz J. In vitro cytotoxicity and dentin permeability of HEMA. Journal of endodontics. 1996;22(5):244-8.
• Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity 1975;31(6):347-64. research.
• Jukic S, Miletic I, Anic I, Britvic S, Osmak M, Sistig S. The mutagenic potential of AH+ and AH26 by Salmonella/microsome assay. Journal of endodontics. 2000;26(6):321-4.
• Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Rackebrandt K. The mutagenic activity of unpolymerized resin monomers in Salmonella typhimurium and V79 cells. Mutation research. 1998;415(1-2):119-30.
• Tadin A, Marovic D, Galic N, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D. Composite-induced toxicity in human gingival and pulp fibroblast cells. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2014;72(4):304-11.
• Costa CA, Vaerten MA, Edwards CA, Hanks CT. Cytotoxic effects of current dental adhesive systems on immortalized odontoblast cell line MDPC-23. Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 1999;15(6):434-41.
• Kleinsasser NH, Wallner BC, Harreus UA, Kleinjung T, Folwaczny M, Hickel R, et al. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of dental materials in human lymphocytes as assessed by the single cell microgel electrophoresis (comet) assay. Journal of dentistry. 2004;32(3):229-34.
• Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Spruss T. The induction of micronuclei in vitro by unpolymerized resin monomers. Journal of dental research. 2001;80(7):1615-20.
• Muller BP, Eisentrager A, Jahnen-Dechent W, Dott W, Hollender J. Effect of sample preparation on the in vitro genotoxicity of a light curable glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003;24(4):611-7.
• Kostoryz EL, Eick JD, Glaros AG, Judy BM, Welshons WV, Burmaster S, et al. Biocompatibility of hydroxylated metabolites of BISGMA and BFDGE. Journal of dental research. 2003;82(5):367-71.
• Kaplan C, Diril N, Sahin S, Cehreli MC. Mutagenic potentials of dental cements as detected by the Salmonella/microsome test. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4019-27.