Performance Assessment In Banking Sector Th rough Analitical Hierarchy Process: Th e Case Of Public Banks, Private Commercial Banks And Participation Banks

Öz

In banking sector, where there is a severe competition, stakeholders of the banks (investors, customers, employees, partners, regulatory institutions etc.) pay great attention to performance of the bank when they choose to put their money. Accordingly, it is important to assess performance of the banks and to determine the criteria that may improve the performance of these institutions. In this study, performance analysis has been made with reference to fi nancial statements of the years between 2009/12-2013/12 belonging to the public, private commercial (fi rst four private commercial banks according size of assets ranking) and participation banks operating in Turkey; as well as some fi nancial ratios from those statements. With the aim of assessing performance of the banks, Analytical Hierarchy Process approach has been used. Multivariate discriminant analysis model and discriminant function created by Altman have also been used for performance assessment. According to the results of the study, it has been concluded that that Vakıfl ar Bankası among the public banks; Akbank among the private commercial banks; and Kuveyt Türk among the participation banks have the highest performance compared to their competitors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Analytical hierarchy process, performance assessment, public banks, participation banks, commercial banks

Kaynakça

1. ALBAYRAK, Y. E. ve ERKUT, H., 2005. ‘Banka Performans Değerlendirmede Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreç Yaklaşımı’, İTÜ Mühendislik Dergisi, 4(6),pp.47–58.
2. ALTMAN, I. E.,1968.‘Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and Th e Prediction of CorporateBankrupcty’, Th e Journal of Finance, 13(4), pp.589-609.
3. ALTMAN, E. I. ve SAUNDERS, A.,1998.‘Credit Risk Measurement: Developments Over Th e 20 Years’, Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, pp.1721–1744.
4. BITIRAK, A. İ. ve ÇETİN, A. C., 2010.‘Banka Karlılık Performansının Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci İle Değerlendirilmesi: Ticari Bankalar İle Katılım Bankalarında Bir Uygulama’, Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2),pp.75-92.
5. CENSER, V. ve KEÇEK, G., 2008.‘Türkiye’de Faaliyette Bulunan Ticaret Bankalarının Performanslarına Göre Sınıfl andırılmasında Etkili Olan Değişkenlerin Belirlenmesi Ve Bir Uygulama Denemesi’, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22,pp.189-206.
6. DİNÇER, H. ve HACIOĞLU, U., 2013. ‘Performance Evaluation With Fuzzy VIKOR and AHP Method Based On Customer Satisfaction İn Turkish Banking Sector’, Kybernetes, 42(7), pp.1072 – 1085.
7. DİNÇER, H. ve GÖRENER, A.,2011.‘Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Vikor Tekniği ile Dinamik Performans Analizi: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama’, Istanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19,pp.109-127.
8. HAFEEZ, K. ZHANG, Y. B. ve MALAK, N., 2002. ‘Determining Key Capabilities Of A Firm Using Analytic Hierarchy Process’, International Journal of Production Economics, 76,pp.39–51.

9. İÇ, Y. T. ve YURDAKUL, M., 2000.‘Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) Yöntemini Kullanan Bir Kredi Değerlendirme Sistemi’, Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der., 15(1), pp.1-14
10. MILLET, I. ve SAATY T. L.,2000. ‘On Th e Relativity Of Relative Measures Accommodating Both Rank Preservation And Rank Reversals In Th e AHP’, European Journal of Operational Research, 121,pp.205–212.
11. SAATY, T. L., 1994.‘How to Make A Decision: Th e Analytic Hierarchy Process’, Interfaces, 24(6),pp.19-43.
12. SAATY, T. L., 2001.‘Analytic Hierarchy Process’, Encyclopedia of Operations Research & Management Science, pp.19-28.
13. SAATY, T. L., 2007.‘Time Dependent Decision-Making; Dynamic Priorities In Th e AHP/ANP: Generalizing From Points To Functions And From Real To Complex Variables’, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46,pp.870-891.
14. SEÇME, N.Y. BAYRAKDAROĞLU, A. ve KAHRAMAN, C.,2009. ‘Fuzzy Performance Evaluation In Turkish Banking Sector Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS’, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), pp.11699-11709.
15. SHARMA, E..2014.‘Measurıng Th e Performance Of Banks: An Applicatıon Of Analytıc Hierarchy Process Model’, International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 6(3),pp.182-197.
16. TA, H. P. ve HAR, K. Y.,2000.‘A Study of Bank Selection Decisions in Singapore Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process’, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(4),pp.170–180.
17. TİMOR, M. (2011).Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi.İstanbul: Türkmen Kitapevi.
18. USTASÜLEYMAN, T..2009.‘Bankacılık Sektöründe Hizmet Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi: AHS-TOPSİS Yöntemi’, Bankacılar Dergisi, 69,pp.33-43.
19. Türkiye Bankalar Birliği, viewed 01.01.2015, .
20. Türkiye Katılım Bankaları Birliği, viewed 01.01.2015, .