The Nature of Lobbying and Regulation in Turkey

Öz

The policy-making and distributive effects of lobbying is a disturbing and highly debated issue in many developing countries. This study will provide a comparative analysis of the two biggest industrial-commercial interest groups in Turkey. The relationship between the policy suggestions of TUSIAD (Turkish Industry and Businessmen Association), and MUSIAD (Independent Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association) and economic policies implemented both at micro and macro level afterthe 1990’s has been placed under great scrutiny. In this paper, an overview of the positive theory of regulation along with the theory of collective action is provided in order to highlight the main discussions covered in existing literature. This paper claims that these two interest groups have conflicting incentives in terms of the regulatory process, arising from the characteristics of their members. Such a situation leads to a struggle to exert influence on governmental policies from which one group benefits, while the other is hurt. The model, adapted from Becker (1983) and partly Olson (1982) and later modified is an attempt to arrive at the optimum level of regulation which favors policies beneficial for each party. A general theory of lobbying and interest-groups in developing countries and specifically Turkey will therefore constitute the theoretical underpinning of this work while the absence of in-depth numeral indicators for the interest groups’ lobbying power dictates that descriptive statistics play an important role. This study will aim at searching out the exact cost and benefit for the groups involved as well as additional hidden factors that might incorporate explanatory power in understanding the relevant dynamics in the case of Turkey

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Economic Policy, Growth, Development, Lobbying, Interest-group, Protectionism, Government Regulation.

Kaynakça

1. Amelung, Torsten. (1989). “The Determinants of Protection in Developing Countries: An Extended Interest-Group Approach”, Kyklos, Vol. 42 J, No: 4, , pp. 515-532.
2. Anderson, Kym. (1995) “Lobbying Incentives and the Pattern of Protection in Rich and Poor Countries”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 43, No. 2, Janu- ary, pp. 401- 423.
3. Annual Reports: TUSIAD (2007 and 2011) and MUSIAD (2007 and 2011).
4. Becker, Gary S., (1983). “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 98, No. 3, August, pp. 371- 400.
5. Buchanan, James M., (1965). “An Economic Theory of Clubs”, Economica, New Series, Vol. 32, No. 125, pp. 1- 14.
6. Coase, Ronald H., (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost”, Journal of Law and Economics, October, pp. 1-44.
7. Bugra, Ayse, (1998). “Class, Culture and State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations”. International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 30 No. 4, , pp. 521-539.
8. Bugra, Ayse, (2002). “Labour Capital and Religion: Harmony and Conflict among the Constituency of Political Islam in Turkey”, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 38 No. 2, April, p. 193.

9. Doner, Richard F. and Schneider, Ben Ross, (2000). “Business Associations and Eco- nomic Development: Why Some Associations Contribute More Than Others”, Business and Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 261- 288.
10. Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan, (1994) “Protection for Sale”, American Eco- nomic Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 833- 850.
11. Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, Elhanan, (2002). Interest Groups and Trade Policy, Princeton University Press,
12. Hardin, Garrett, (1968). “The Tragedy of the Commons”, Science. Vol. 162 No. 3859, pp. 1243-1248.
13. Independent Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association, Economic Report on Turkish Economy 2007, June 2007.
14. Kahn, Alfred, The Economics of Regulation Principles and Institutions, vol. I-II, The MIT Press, 1988.
15. Maitland, Ian, (1985). “Interest Groups and Economic Growth Rates”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 44-58.
16. Mork, Knut Anton, (1993). “Living with Lobbying: A Growth Policy Co-Opted by Lob- byists Can Be Better than No Growth Policy at All”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 4 (Dec.), pp. 597- 605.
17. Murphy, K. M., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny., (1991). “The Allocation of Talent: Implica- tions for Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 106, pp. 503-530.
18. North, Douglass C., (1983). “A Theory of Economic Change” (Review), Science, New Series, Vol. 219, No. 4581, 163- 164.
19. Olson, Mancur, (1965). The Logic of Collective Action, Harvard University Press, Cam- bridge.
20. Olson, Mancur, (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations, Yale University Press,
21. Öniş, Ziya and Türem, Umut, (2001). Entrepreneurs, Democracy and Citizenship in Turkey, July
22. Öniş, Ziya and Webb, Steven B., (1992). Political Economy of Policy Reform in Turkey in the 1980s, World Bank Policy Research Working Papers WPS 1059.
23. Özdemir, Şennur, (2005). Some Notes on the Possibility of an “Islamic Economy” A Case Study, The Turkish Yearbook, Vol. 36, pp. 201-216.
24. Peltzman, Sam, (1976). “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation”, Journal of Law and Economics.
25. Persson, Torsten, (1998). Economic Policy and Special Interest Politics, Economic Journal, Vol. 108, No. 447, pp. 310- 327.
26. Posner, Richard A., (1974). “Theories of Economic Regulation”, Bell Journal of Economics and management Science, Vol. 5 pp. 335- 358.
27. Shambayati, Hootan, The Rentier State, (1994). “Interest Groups, and the Paradox of Autonomy”, Comparative Politics, Vol. 26, No. 3, April, pp. 307- 331.
28. Stigler, George J., (1971). “The Theory of Economic Regulation”, The Bell Journal of Eco- nomics and Management Science.
29. Tullock, Gordon. (1983). “The Rise and Decline of Nations by Mancur Olson” (Review), Public Choice, Vol. 40, No. 1 pp. 111- 116.
30. Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association (TUSIAD) and Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Understanding Economic Growth, April 2005(a).
31. Turkish Industrialists’ and Businessmen’s Association (TUSIAD) Report, Turkish Econ- omy Towards 2006: From Stability to Sustainable Growth, December 2005(b).
32. Williamson, O. E., (1979). “Transaction-Cost Economis: The Governance of Contrac- tual Relations”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 233-261.
33. Williamson, O. E., (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, , New York, NY: Free Press.
34. Yankaya, Dilek, (2009). “The Europeanization of MUSIAD: Political opportunism, Economic Europeanization, Islamic Euroscepticism”, European Journal of Turkish Studies (Online), Vol. 9.