Mutfakta gıda karbon ayak izi ve değişen beslenme örüntüleri: bibliyometrik ve bilimsel haritalama yaklaşımıyla bir inceleme

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 50 - 63, 30.12.2025

Hamdi Ayyıldız , Cuma Akbay

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2020–2025 yılları arasında Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanında yayımlanan ve hanehalkı bağlamında gıda karbon ayak izi, beslenme alışkanlıkları ve çevresel etkileri ele alan araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizini sunmaktadır. Toplam 674 belge, alanın entelektüel yapısını incelemek, baskın kavramsal eğilimleri belirlemek ve uluslararası iş birliği örüntülerini haritalamak amacıyla Bibliometrix R paketi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, incelenen dönemde yayın üretiminde istikrarlı bir artış olduğunu ve karbon ayak izi, çevresel etki, yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi ile iklim değişikliği gibi temaların literatürün temel kavramları hâline geldiğini göstermektedir. Sonuçlar ayrıca, Journal of Cleaner Production ve Science of the Total Environment gibi önde gelen dergilerin bilgi üretiminde merkezî bir konumda yer aldığını, Çin’in yayın üretkenliğinde öne çıktığını ve Belçika’nın atıf etkisi açısından dikkat çekici bir performans sergilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Sosyal ağ analizleri, Çin–ABD ekseninde yoğunlaşan güçlü iş birliği ilişkilerinin yanı sıra Avrupa ve Avustralya’da yeni araştırma kümelerinin ortaya çıktığını göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, atık yönetimi, döngüsel ekonomi ve beslenme davranışlarına ilişkin temaların giderek artan önemi, mutfak bağlamında sürdürülebilirlik odaklı araştırmaların genişleyen disiplinler arası niteliğine işaret etmektedir. Genel olarak bu çalışma, sürdürülebilirlik araştırmalarında bibliyometrik yaklaşımların stratejik değerini vurgulamakta ve gelecekteki çalışmalar için umut vadeden araştırma yönlerine dikkat çekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gıda karbon ayak izi , sürdürülebilir beslenme , mutfak pratikleri , bibliyometrik analiz , bilimsel haritalama , çevresel sürdürülebilirlik

Etik Beyan

Bu makalede insan veya hayvan deneklerle herhangi bir çalışma bulunmaması nedeniyle etik onaya gerek duyulmamaktadır. Makale yazarları aralarında herhangi bir çıkar çatışması olmadığını beyan ederler. Yazarlar çalışmaya eşit oranda katkı sağlamış olduklarını beyan eder.

Food carbon footprint and changing dietary patterns in the kitchen: a review with a bibliometric and scientific mapping approach

Öz

This study provides a bibliometric analysis of research published between 2020 and 2025 in the Web of Science Core Collection that examines food carbon footprints, dietary habits, and environmental impacts within the household context. A total of 674 documents were analyzed using the Bibliometrix R package to explore the intellectual structure of the field, identify prevailing conceptual trends, and map international collaboration patterns. The results reveal a steady growth in publication output over the study period and indicate that carbon footprint, environmental impact, life cycle assessment, and climate change have become core concepts within the literature. The findings further show that leading journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production and Science of the Total Environment occupy central positions in knowledge production, while China emerges as the most productive country and Belgium demonstrates a notably high citation impact. Social network analyses highlight strong collaborative linkages along the China–USA axis, alongside the emergence of new research clusters in Europe and Australia. Moreover, the increasing prominence of themes related to waste management, circular economy, and dietary behavior reflects the expanding interdisciplinary scope of sustainability-oriented research in the kitchen context. Overall, this study underscores the strategic value of bibliometric approaches in sustainability research and identifies promising directions for future inquiry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Food carbon footprint , sustainable diets , kitchen practices , bibliometric analysis , scientific mapping , environmental sustainability

Etik Beyan

Since this study does not involve any research with human or animal subjects, ethical approval is not required. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest among them. The authors also declare that they contributed equally to this study.

Kaynakça

• Aamaas, B. & Grimsby, L.K. (2024). The impact on climate and emissions of clean household cooking energy policies in Tanzania, Energy Policy, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114211.
• Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C., D’Aniello, L., Misuraca, M. & Spano, M. (2022). Thematic analysis as a new culturomic tool: The social media coverage on COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Sustainability, 14(6), 3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063643
• Aria, M., Misuraca, M. & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
• Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F.N. & Leip, A. (2021).
• Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food, 2(3), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9
• Davies, K. P., Gibney, E.R., Leonard, U.M., Lindberg, L., Woodside, J.V., Kiely, M.E., Nugent, A.P., Arranz, E., Conway, M.C., McCarthy, S.N. & O’Sullivan, A.M. (2025). Sustainable diets reduce diet-related greenhouse gas emissions and improve diet quality: results from the MyPlanetDiet randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 122(4), 962-971.
• Du, J., Wang, S., Liu, Y. & Zhang, X. (2024). A review of household carbon footprint: Measurement approaches, influencing factors, and mitigation pathways. Carbon Footprint, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20517/cf.2023.45
• Ellili, N.O.D. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and Sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03067-6
• Elyasitabar, N., Vieux, F., Soltani, S., & Darmon, N. (2025). Dietary patterns and their environmental impacts: A narrative review of recent evidence. Sustainable Food Systems, 4, Article 100142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-024-00215-3
• Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K.B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K.A., Akintade, D.D. & Koh, S.C.L. (2021). A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164, 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
• Li, G., Chen, X., Zhang, Y. & Liu, J. (2025). Carbon emissions from food consumption and reduction pathways: Evidence from consumption-based life cycle assessment. Sustainability, 17(2), 690.
• Lin, J. (2023). Research progress and implications of household food waste: Measurement, behavioral drivers, and environmental impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 136020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136020
• Liu, C., Feng, K., Hubacek, K. & Sun, L. (2023). Exploring household food waste reduction for carbon mitigation: Evidence from consumption-based accounting. Foods, 12(17), 3211. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12173211
• Long, Y., Wang, H., Sun, M. & Chen, W. (2025). Tracing the evolution of household carbon emission research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Energy Research & Social Science, 110, 103438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103438
• Mandouri, J., El Ghaziri, A. & Ben Abdallah, S. (2025). Carbon footprint of food production systems: A systematic review of life cycle assessment studies. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 2841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-82841-7
• Nobanee, H., Al Hamadi, F. Y., Abdulaziz, F. A., Abukarsh, L. S., Alqahtani, A. F., AlSubaey, S. K., Alqahtani, S. M. & Almansoori, H. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of sustainability and risk management. sustainability, 13(6), 3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063277
• Roque, BM., Venegas, M., Kinley, RD., de Nys, R., Duarte, TL, Yang, X. & Kebreab, E. (2021) Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers. PLOS ONE 16(3), e0247820. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247820
• Shirvanimoghaddam, K., Motamed, B., Ramakrishna, S. & Naebe, M. (2020). Death by waste: Fashion and textile circular economy case. Science of the Total Environment, 718, 137317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137317
• Xue, L., Liu, X., Lu, S., Cheng, G., Hu, Y., Liu, J., Dou, Z., Cheng, S. & Liu, G (2021). China’s food loss and waste embodies increasing environmental impacts. Nat Food 2, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00317-6
• Zhao, Z., Lv, X., Wang, Y., Lv, G., Miao, B., Hu, O., Ouyang, C., Liu, Y. & Yan, L. (2022). Research on carbon emissions of urban residents’ three types of dining based on the whole life cycle, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 17, 1036–1045, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctac069.