Epistemolojik Savaşın Yeni Cephesi: Aşırı Sağın Dijital Radikalleşme Dinamikleri ve Mizah Stratejileri

Öz

Bu çalışma, dijital medya ortamlarının aşırı sağ ideolojileri nasıl dönüştürdüğünü; memetik iletişim, algoritmik etkileşim ve merkeziyetsiz dijital ağlar çerçevesinde incelemektedir. Cass Sunstein’in radikalleşme kuramı ve Manuel Castells’in ağ toplumu yaklaşımı doğrultusunda, mizahın—özellikle memeler yoluyla—hakikat ile kurgu arasındaki sınırları bulanıklaştıran bir epistemolojik silah olarak işlev gördüğü ortaya konulmuştur. Telegram gibi şifreli platformlar, yankı odalarının yeniden üretimini sağlayarak bireylerin bilgi izolasyonunu derinleştirir ve merkezi bir otorite olmaksızın ulusötesi örgütlenmeyi mümkün kılar. Aşırı sağ aktörler, ironi, hiciv ve görsel kültür aracılığıyla dışlayıcı söylemleri yayarken özellikle genç kitleleri hedef alır. Sosyal medya algoritmaları bu süreci duygusal açıdan yüklü içerikleri öne çıkararak güçlendirir. Çalışma, literatür taraması ve kavramsal analiz yoluyla dijital radikalleşme mekanizmalarına ilişkin bütüncül bir değerlendirme sunar. Sonuç olarak, dijital aşırı sağ stratejilerin bireylerin hakikat, kimlik ve siyasal katılım algısını dönüştürerek demokratik söylemi tehdit ettiği vurgulanır. Bu tehditle başa çıkmak için algoritmik şeffaflık, etik platform yönetişimi ve dijital medya okuryazarlığı gibi sistematik önlemler önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aşırı Sağ
• Dijital Radikalleşme
• Mizah
• Algoritmalar
• Meme Kültürü.

The New Front of the Epistemological War: Digital Radicalization Dynamics and Humor Strategies of the Far-Right

Öz

This study explores how digital media environments have transformed far-right ideologies by integrating memetic communication, algorithmic amplification, and decentralized networks. Drawing on Cass Sunstein’s theory of radicalization and Manuel Castells’ network society framework, the study demonstrates that humor—especially in the form of memes—functions as an epistemological weapon, blurring the line between truth and fiction and facilitating the normalization of extremist discourse. Encrypted platforms such as Telegram enable the reproduction of echo chambers, reinforcing ideological isolation and fostering transnational coordination without centralized authority. Far-right actors strategically use irony, satire, and visual culture to disseminate exclusionary narratives, especially targeting younger audiences. Social media algorithms intensify this process by promoting emotionally charged content, thus reinforcing ideological bubbles. The study employs a qualitative methodology based on literature review and conceptual analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of digital radicalization mechanisms. It concludes that far-right digital strategies pose a profound threat to democratic discourse by reshaping how individuals perceive truth, identity, and political participation. To counter this, systemic responses must include algorithmic transparency, ethical platform governance, and investment in digital literacy to promote epistemic resilience. The research contributes to the broader understanding of how ideology and technology intersect in the age of digitally mediated extremism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Far-Right
• Digital Radicalization
• Humor
• Algorithms
• Meme Culture.

Kaynakça

1. Anttiroiko, A. (2015). Networks in context: The concept of network in Manuel Castells’ theory of the network society. Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, 6(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v6.1(11).04
2. Aral, S. (2022). Furya makinesi: Sosyal medya seçimlerimizi, ekonomimizi ve sağlığımızı nasıl bozuyor? (S. H. Özçelik, Çev.). Tellekt.
3. Askanius, T. (2021). On frogs, monkeys, and execution memes: Exploring the humor-hate nexus at the intersection of neo-nazi and alt-right movements in Sweden. Television & New Media, 22(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982234
4. Askanius, T., & Keller, N. (2021). Murder fantasies in memes: Fascist aesthetics of death threats and the banalization of white supremacist violence. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2522–2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1974517
5. Atar, M. C. (2024). 6 Ocak ayaklanmasına giden yol: ABD’de hakikatin çöküşü ve sosyal ağ kitlelerinin gücü (1st ed.). Eğitim Yayınları.
6. Balleck, B. J. (2014). Modern American extremism: From the Klan to the Tea Party. Praeger.
7. Baspehlivan, U. (2023). Theorising the memescape: The spatial politics of internet memes. Review of International Studies, 50(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210523000049
8. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2015). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. In Handbook of Digital Politics. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548768.00020

9. Berger, J. M. (2018). Extremism. MIT Press.
10. Berger, J. M. (2020). The strategy of violent white supremacy: Why it matters. ICCT Journal, February 2020. https://icct.nl
11. Blee, K. M. (2002). Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. University of California Press.
12. Brown, K., Mondon, A., & Winter, A. (2021). The far right, the mainstream and mainstreaming: Towards a heuristic framework. Journal of Political Ideologies, 28(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1949829
13. Burnham, S., Arbeit, M., & Hilliard, L. (2022). The subtle spread of hateful memes: examining engageme nt intentions among parents of adolescents. Social Media + Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221095100
14. Butt, K. M., & Khalid, M. (2018). Rise of the far-right groups in Trump's America. Journal of Political Studies, 25(2), 105–120.
15. Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
16. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
17. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Polity Press.
18. Cesarino, L., & Nardelli, P. H. J. (2021). The hidden hierarchy of far-right digital guerrilla warfare. Digital War, 2, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-021-00017-6
19. Chagas, V. (2024). Far-right memespheres and platform affordances: The effects of environmental opacity on the spread of extremist memes on Twitter and WhatsApp. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 52(4), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2024.2355114
20. Chagas, V., Carreiro, R., Santos, N., & Popolin, G. (2022). Far-right digital activism in polarized contexts: a comparative analysis of engagement in hashtag wars. Media and Communication, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5622
21. Charalambous, G. and Christoforou, P. (2018). Far-right extremism and populist rhetoric: greece and cyprus during an era of crisis. South European Society and Politics, 23(4), 451-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2018.1555957
22. Dafaure, M. (2020). The “Great Meme War:” The Alt-Right and its multifarious enemies. Angles, (10). http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369
23. Darius, P., & Stephany, F. (2019). “Hashjacking” the debate: Polarisation strategies of Germany’s political far-right on Twitter. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 298–308). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_21
24. Davis, M. (2019). A new, online culture war? The communication world of Breitbart.com. Communication Research and Practice, 5(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1646362
25. DeAngelis, R. (2003). A rising tide for jean–marie, jörg, & pauline? xenophobic populism in comparative perspective. Australian Journal of Politics &Amp; History, 49(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8497.00282
26. DeCook, J. R., & Yoon, M. (2021). Kung flu and roof Koreans: Asian/Americans as the hated other and proxies of hating in the white imaginary. Journal of Hate Studies, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.199
27. Dehghan, E., & Nagappa, A. (2022). Politicization and radicalization of discourses in the alt-tech ecosystem: A case study on Gab Social. Social Media + Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221113075
28. Doerr, N. (2017). Bridging language barriers, bonding against immigrants: A visual case study of transnational network publics created by far-right activists in Europe. Discourse & Society, 28(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676689
29. Donovan, J., Lewis, B., & Friedberg, B. (2018). Parallel ports: Sociotechnical change from the alt-right to alt-tech. In Edition Politik (pp. 49–66). https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706-004
30. Fernández-Ardèvol, M., & Ribera‐Fumaz, R. (2022). The network society today. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092800
31. Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
32. Fry, H. (2018). Merhaba dünya: Makine çağında insan olmak (İ. G. Çıgay, Çev.). Hep Kitap.
33. Gallagher, R., & Topinka, R. (2023). The politics of the NPC meme: Reactionary subcultural practice and vernacular theory. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231172422
34. Ganesh, B. (2020). Weaponizing white thymos: Flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt-right. Cultural Studies, 34(6), 892–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1714687
35. Greene, V. S. (2019). “Deplorable” satire: Alt-right memes, white genocide tweets, and redpilling normies. Studies in American Humor, 5(1), 31–69. https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031
36. Hagen, S. (2022). ‘who is /ourguy/?’: tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of 4chan/pol/. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1735-1755. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221078274
37. Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in finland. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
38. Jasser, G., McSwiney, J., Pertwee, E., & Zannettou, S. (2021). ‘Welcome to #gabfam’: Far-right virtual community on Gab. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1728–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211024546
39. Jay, S., Batruch, A., Jetten, J., McGarty, C., & Muldoon, O. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far‐right populism: a social psychological analysis. Journal of Community &Amp; Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409
40. Karataşlı, Ş. S. and Kumral, Ş. (2022). Crisis of capitalism and cycles of right‐wing populism in contemporary turkey: the making and unmaking of erdoğanist hegemony. Journal of Agrarian Change, 23(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12501
41. Kasimov, A., Johnston, R., & Heer, T. (2023). “pepe the frog, the greedy merchant and #stopthesteal”: a comparative study of discursive and memetic communication on twitter and 4chan/pol during the insurrection on the us capitol. New Media & Society, 27(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231172963
42. Knox, H. (2021). Traversing the infrastructures of digital life. In Digital Anthropology (pp. 178–196). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087885-13
43. Krzyżanowski, M. and Ekström, M. (2022). The normalization of far-right populism and nativist authoritarianism: discursive practices in media, journalism and the wider public sphere/s. Discourse &Amp; Society, 33(6), 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095406
44. Masalha, O., & Baş, Ö. (2023). An analysis of social media content shared by right-wing extremist groups in the United States, the Great Britain and Australia. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 64, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1283706
45. Matlack, A. K., Boots, B. C., & Richardson-Gool, T. S. (2024). The impact of internet connectivity in navigating online social networks: A cross-country analysis. In Proceedings of the TPRC2024 The Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4913130
46. McCarthy, J. (2019). Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Environment: Comparative Experiences, Insights, and Perspectives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 301–313.
47. McSwiney, J. and Sengul, K. (2023). Humor, ridicule, and the far right: mainstreaming exclusion through online animation. Television & New Media, 25(4), 315-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764231213816
48. Melhem, A., Halloush, Z., & Aleroud, A. (2024). Dynamic network analysis of cognitive attacks using meta-network modeling and community detection algorithms. In IEEE 6th International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI). https://doi.org/10.1109/CogMI57468.2024.00014
49. Mihailescu, M. (2024). Never mess with the “memers”: How meme creators are redefining contemporary politics. Social Media + Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241296256
50. Miller-Idriss, C. (2023). Anavatanda nefret: Yeni küresel aşırı sağ (B. Hıroğlu, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
51. Moffitt, B. (2020). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford University Press.
52. Mondon, A. and Dawes, S. (2023). The mainstreaming of the far right in france: republican, liberal and illiberal articulations of racism. French Cultural Studies, 34(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/09571558231157224
53. Moreno-Almeida, C., & Gerbaudo, P. (2021). Memes and the Moroccan far-right. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(4), 882–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221995083
54. Mudde, C. (2018). The far right in America. Routledge.
55. Mudde, C. (2022). Günümüzde aşırı sağ (S. E. Türközü, Çev.). Nika Yayınları.
56. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
57. Neiwert, D. (2017). Alt-America: The rise of the radical right in the age of Trump. Verso Books.
58. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479837243
59. Olanipekun, S. O. (2025). Computational propaganda and misinformation: AI technologies as tools of media manipulation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1), 911–923. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0248
60. Olivieri, L. (2024). Simona Tiribelli, personal identity and algorithms. An issue of moral philosophy. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 15(1), 155–158. https://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/424
61. O'Neil, C. (2020). Matematiksel imha silahları: Büyük veri, eşitsizliği nasıl artırıp demokrasiyi tehdit ediyor? (A. E. Pilgir, Çev.). Tellekt.
62. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
63. Potok, M. (2015–2020). The year in hate and extremism [Annual Reports]. Southern Poverty Law Center. https://www.splcenter.org
64. Rickardsson, J. (2021). The urban–rural divide in radical right populist support: the role of resident’s characteristics, urbanization trends and public service supply. The Annals of Regional Science, 67(1), 211-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01046-1
65. Ristić, K. (2023). Far-right digital memory activism: transnational circulation of memes and memory of yugoslav wars. Memory Studies, 17(4), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231155596
66. Rothut, S., Schulze, H., Hohner, J., & Rieger, D. (2023). Ambassadors of ideology: A conceptualization and computational investigation of far-right influencers, their networking structures, and communication practices. New Media & Society, 26(12), 7120–7147. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231164409
67. Sakki, I., & Pettersson, K. (2015). Discursive constructions of otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2142
68. Štefančík, R., Némethová, I., & Seresová, T. (2021). Securitisation of migration in the language of slovak far-right populism. Migration Letters, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i6.1387
69. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford University Press.
70. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
71. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
72. Thompson, J., & Hawley, G. (2021). Does the alt‐right still matter? An examination of alt‐right influence between 2016 and 2018. Nations and Nationalism, 27(4), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12736
73. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203–218.
74. Urman, A., & Katz, S. (2020). What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1803946
75. Valasik, M., & Reid, S. E. (2023). Alt‐right gangs and far‐right extremists: From the margins to the mainstream. Sociology Compass, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13094
76. Webb, A. (2021). Dokuz dünya devi: Teknoloji devleri ve onların düşünen makineleri insanlığı nasıl tahrip edebilir? (D. Dalgakıran, Çev.). Kronik Kitap.
77. Wijayanto, E. (2023). Technoculture as a “culture revolution” in network society. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-058-9_18
78. Winter, A. (2019). Online hate: From the far-right to the ‘alt-right’ and from the margins to the mainstream. In K. Lumsden & E. Harmer (Eds.), Online othering (pp. 39–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
79. Zehring, M. and Domahidi, E. (2023). German corona protest mobilizers on telegram and their relations to the far right: a network and topic analysis. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231155106
80. Zhang, X., & Davis, M. (2022). E-extremism: A conceptual framework for studying the online far right. New Media & Society, 26(5), 2954–2970. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221098360