Epistemolojik Savaşın Yeni Cephesi: Aşırı Sağın Dijital Radikalleşme Dinamikleri ve Mizah Stratejileri

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4, 297 - 322, 30.11.2025

Mert Can Atar

https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2025.04.002.x

Öz

Bu çalışma, dijital medya ortamlarının aşırı sağ ideolojileri nasıl dönüştürdüğünü; memetik iletişim, algoritmik etkileşim ve merkeziyetsiz dijital ağlar çerçevesinde incelemektedir. Cass Sunstein’in radikalleşme kuramı ve Manuel Castells’in ağ toplumu yaklaşımı doğrultusunda, mizahın—özellikle memeler yoluyla—hakikat ile kurgu arasındaki sınırları bulanıklaştıran bir epistemolojik silah olarak işlev gördüğü ortaya konulmuştur. Telegram gibi şifreli platformlar, yankı odalarının yeniden üretimini sağlayarak bireylerin bilgi izolasyonunu derinleştirir ve merkezi bir otorite olmaksızın ulusötesi örgütlenmeyi mümkün kılar. Aşırı sağ aktörler, ironi, hiciv ve görsel kültür aracılığıyla dışlayıcı söylemleri yayarken özellikle genç kitleleri hedef alır. Sosyal medya algoritmaları bu süreci duygusal açıdan yüklü içerikleri öne çıkararak güçlendirir. Çalışma, literatür taraması ve kavramsal analiz yoluyla dijital radikalleşme mekanizmalarına ilişkin bütüncül bir değerlendirme sunar. Sonuç olarak, dijital aşırı sağ stratejilerin bireylerin hakikat, kimlik ve siyasal katılım algısını dönüştürerek demokratik söylemi tehdit ettiği vurgulanır. Bu tehditle başa çıkmak için algoritmik şeffaflık, etik platform yönetişimi ve dijital medya okuryazarlığı gibi sistematik önlemler önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aşırı Sağ , Dijital Radikalleşme , Mizah , Algoritmalar , Meme Kültürü.

Proje Numarası

-

The New Front of the Epistemological War: Digital Radicalization Dynamics and Humor Strategies of the Far-Right

Öz

This study explores how digital media environments have transformed far-right ideologies by integrating memetic communication, algorithmic amplification, and decentralized networks. Drawing on Cass Sunstein’s theory of radicalization and Manuel Castells’ network society framework, the study demonstrates that humor—especially in the form of memes—functions as an epistemological weapon, blurring the line between truth and fiction and facilitating the normalization of extremist discourse. Encrypted platforms such as Telegram enable the reproduction of echo chambers, reinforcing ideological isolation and fostering transnational coordination without centralized authority. Far-right actors strategically use irony, satire, and visual culture to disseminate exclusionary narratives, especially targeting younger audiences. Social media algorithms intensify this process by promoting emotionally charged content, thus reinforcing ideological bubbles. The study employs a qualitative methodology based on literature review and conceptual analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding of digital radicalization mechanisms. It concludes that far-right digital strategies pose a profound threat to democratic discourse by reshaping how individuals perceive truth, identity, and political participation. To counter this, systemic responses must include algorithmic transparency, ethical platform governance, and investment in digital literacy to promote epistemic resilience. The research contributes to the broader understanding of how ideology and technology intersect in the age of digitally mediated extremism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Far-Right , Digital Radicalization , Humor , Algorithms , Meme Culture.

Etik Beyan

-

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

• Anttiroiko, A. (2015). Networks in context: The concept of network in Manuel Castells’ theory of the network society. Theoretical and Practical Research in the Economic Fields, 6(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v6.1(11).04
• Aral, S. (2022). Furya makinesi: Sosyal medya seçimlerimizi, ekonomimizi ve sağlığımızı nasıl bozuyor? (S. H. Özçelik, Çev.). Tellekt.
• Askanius, T. (2021). On frogs, monkeys, and execution memes: Exploring the humor-hate nexus at the intersection of neo-nazi and alt-right movements in Sweden. Television & New Media, 22(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982234
• Askanius, T., & Keller, N. (2021). Murder fantasies in memes: Fascist aesthetics of death threats and the banalization of white supremacist violence. Information, Communication & Society, 24(16), 2522–2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.1974517
• Atar, M. C. (2024). 6 Ocak ayaklanmasına giden yol: ABD’de hakikatin çöküşü ve sosyal ağ kitlelerinin gücü (1st ed.). Eğitim Yayınları.
• Balleck, B. J. (2014). Modern American extremism: From the Klan to the Tea Party. Praeger.
• Baspehlivan, U. (2023). Theorising the memescape: The spatial politics of internet memes. Review of International Studies, 50(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210523000049
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2015). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. In Handbook of Digital Politics. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548768.00020
• Berger, J. M. (2018). Extremism. MIT Press.
• Berger, J. M. (2020). The strategy of violent white supremacy: Why it matters. ICCT Journal, February 2020. https://icct.nl
• Blee, K. M. (2002). Inside organized racism: Women in the hate movement. University of California Press.
• Brown, K., Mondon, A., & Winter, A. (2021). The far right, the mainstream and mainstreaming: Towards a heuristic framework. Journal of Political Ideologies, 28(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2021.1949829
• Burnham, S., Arbeit, M., & Hilliard, L. (2022). The subtle spread of hateful memes: examining engageme nt intentions among parents of adolescents. Social Media + Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221095100
• Butt, K. M., & Khalid, M. (2018). Rise of the far-right groups in Trump's America. Journal of Political Studies, 25(2), 105–120.
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
• Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Polity Press.
• Cesarino, L., & Nardelli, P. H. J. (2021). The hidden hierarchy of far-right digital guerrilla warfare. Digital War, 2, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-021-00017-6
• Chagas, V. (2024). Far-right memespheres and platform affordances: The effects of environmental opacity on the spread of extremist memes on Twitter and WhatsApp. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 52(4), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2024.2355114
• Chagas, V., Carreiro, R., Santos, N., & Popolin, G. (2022). Far-right digital activism in polarized contexts: a comparative analysis of engagement in hashtag wars. Media and Communication, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5622
• Charalambous, G. and Christoforou, P. (2018). Far-right extremism and populist rhetoric: greece and cyprus during an era of crisis. South European Society and Politics, 23(4), 451-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2018.1555957
• Dafaure, M. (2020). The “Great Meme War:” The Alt-Right and its multifarious enemies. Angles, (10). http://journals.openedition.org/angles/369
• Darius, P., & Stephany, F. (2019). “Hashjacking” the debate: Polarisation strategies of Germany’s political far-right on Twitter. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 298–308). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34971-4_21
• Davis, M. (2019). A new, online culture war? The communication world of Breitbart.com. Communication Research and Practice, 5(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1646362
• DeAngelis, R. (2003). A rising tide for jean–marie, jörg, & pauline? xenophobic populism in comparative perspective. Australian Journal of Politics &Amp; History, 49(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8497.00282
• DeCook, J. R., & Yoon, M. (2021). Kung flu and roof Koreans: Asian/Americans as the hated other and proxies of hating in the white imaginary. Journal of Hate Studies, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.33972/jhs.199
• Dehghan, E., & Nagappa, A. (2022). Politicization and radicalization of discourses in the alt-tech ecosystem: A case study on Gab Social. Social Media + Society, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221113075
• Doerr, N. (2017). Bridging language barriers, bonding against immigrants: A visual case study of transnational network publics created by far-right activists in Europe. Discourse & Society, 28(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676689
• Donovan, J., Lewis, B., & Friedberg, B. (2018). Parallel ports: Sociotechnical change from the alt-right to alt-tech. In Edition Politik (pp. 49–66). https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706-004
• Fernández-Ardèvol, M., & Ribera‐Fumaz, R. (2022). The network society today. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092800
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
• Fry, H. (2018). Merhaba dünya: Makine çağında insan olmak (İ. G. Çıgay, Çev.). Hep Kitap.
• Gallagher, R., & Topinka, R. (2023). The politics of the NPC meme: Reactionary subcultural practice and vernacular theory. Big Data & Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231172422
• Ganesh, B. (2020). Weaponizing white thymos: Flows of rage in the online audiences of the alt-right. Cultural Studies, 34(6), 892–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1714687
• Greene, V. S. (2019). “Deplorable” satire: Alt-right memes, white genocide tweets, and redpilling normies. Studies in American Humor, 5(1), 31–69. https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031
• Hagen, S. (2022). ‘who is /ourguy/?’: tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of 4chan/pol/. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1735-1755. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221078274
• Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in finland. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
• Jasser, G., McSwiney, J., Pertwee, E., & Zannettou, S. (2021). ‘Welcome to #gabfam’: Far-right virtual community on Gab. New Media & Society, 25(7), 1728–1745. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211024546
• Jay, S., Batruch, A., Jetten, J., McGarty, C., & Muldoon, O. T. (2019). Economic inequality and the rise of far‐right populism: a social psychological analysis. Journal of Community &Amp; Applied Social Psychology, 29(5), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2409
• Karataşlı, Ş. S. and Kumral, Ş. (2022). Crisis of capitalism and cycles of right‐wing populism in contemporary turkey: the making and unmaking of erdoğanist hegemony. Journal of Agrarian Change, 23(1), 22-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12501
• Kasimov, A., Johnston, R., & Heer, T. (2023). “pepe the frog, the greedy merchant and #stopthesteal”: a comparative study of discursive and memetic communication on twitter and 4chan/pol during the insurrection on the us capitol. New Media & Society, 27(1), 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231172963
• Knox, H. (2021). Traversing the infrastructures of digital life. In Digital Anthropology (pp. 178–196). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087885-13
• Krzyżanowski, M. and Ekström, M. (2022). The normalization of far-right populism and nativist authoritarianism: discursive practices in media, journalism and the wider public sphere/s. Discourse &Amp; Society, 33(6), 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221095406
• Masalha, O., & Baş, Ö. (2023). An analysis of social media content shared by right-wing extremist groups in the United States, the Great Britain and Australia. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 64, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2023-1283706
• Matlack, A. K., Boots, B. C., & Richardson-Gool, T. S. (2024). The impact of internet connectivity in navigating online social networks: A cross-country analysis. In Proceedings of the TPRC2024 The Research Conference on Communications, Information and Internet Policy. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4913130
• McCarthy, J. (2019). Authoritarianism, Populism, and the Environment: Comparative Experiences, Insights, and Perspectives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 301–313.
• McSwiney, J. and Sengul, K. (2023). Humor, ridicule, and the far right: mainstreaming exclusion through online animation. Television & New Media, 25(4), 315-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764231213816
• Melhem, A., Halloush, Z., & Aleroud, A. (2024). Dynamic network analysis of cognitive attacks using meta-network modeling and community detection algorithms. In IEEE 6th International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI). https://doi.org/10.1109/CogMI57468.2024.00014
• Mihailescu, M. (2024). Never mess with the “memers”: How meme creators are redefining contemporary politics. Social Media + Society, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241296256
• Miller-Idriss, C. (2023). Anavatanda nefret: Yeni küresel aşırı sağ (B. Hıroğlu, Çev.). Ayrıntı Yayınları.
• Moffitt, B. (2020). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style and Representation. Stanford University Press.
• Mondon, A. and Dawes, S. (2023). The mainstreaming of the far right in france: republican, liberal and illiberal articulations of racism. French Cultural Studies, 34(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/09571558231157224
• Moreno-Almeida, C., & Gerbaudo, P. (2021). Memes and the Moroccan far-right. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(4), 882–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221995083
• Mudde, C. (2018). The far right in America. Routledge.
• Mudde, C. (2022). Günümüzde aşırı sağ (S. E. Türközü, Çev.). Nika Yayınları.
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Neiwert, D. (2017). Alt-America: The rise of the radical right in the age of Trump. Verso Books.
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9781479837243
• Olanipekun, S. O. (2025). Computational propaganda and misinformation: AI technologies as tools of media manipulation. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1), 911–923. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.0248
• Olivieri, L. (2024). Simona Tiribelli, personal identity and algorithms. An issue of moral philosophy. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 15(1), 155–158. https://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/424
• O'Neil, C. (2020). Matematiksel imha silahları: Büyük veri, eşitsizliği nasıl artırıp demokrasiyi tehdit ediyor? (A. E. Pilgir, Çev.). Tellekt.
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
• Potok, M. (2015–2020). The year in hate and extremism [Annual Reports]. Southern Poverty Law Center. https://www.splcenter.org
• Rickardsson, J. (2021). The urban–rural divide in radical right populist support: the role of resident’s characteristics, urbanization trends and public service supply. The Annals of Regional Science, 67(1), 211-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-021-01046-1
• Ristić, K. (2023). Far-right digital memory activism: transnational circulation of memes and memory of yugoslav wars. Memory Studies, 17(4), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231155596
• Rothut, S., Schulze, H., Hohner, J., & Rieger, D. (2023). Ambassadors of ideology: A conceptualization and computational investigation of far-right influencers, their networking structures, and communication practices. New Media & Society, 26(12), 7120–7147. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231164409
• Sakki, I., & Pettersson, K. (2015). Discursive constructions of otherness in populist radical right political blogs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2142
• Štefančík, R., Némethová, I., & Seresová, T. (2021). Securitisation of migration in the language of slovak far-right populism. Migration Letters, 18(6). https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i6.1387
• Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. Oxford University Press.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
• Thompson, J., & Hawley, G. (2021). Does the alt‐right still matter? An examination of alt‐right influence between 2016 and 2018. Nations and Nationalism, 27(4), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12736
• Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203–218.
• Urman, A., & Katz, S. (2020). What they do in the shadows: Examining the far-right networks on Telegram. Information, Communication & Society, 25(7), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1803946
• Valasik, M., & Reid, S. E. (2023). Alt‐right gangs and far‐right extremists: From the margins to the mainstream. Sociology Compass, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13094
• Webb, A. (2021). Dokuz dünya devi: Teknoloji devleri ve onların düşünen makineleri insanlığı nasıl tahrip edebilir? (D. Dalgakıran, Çev.). Kronik Kitap.
• Wijayanto, E. (2023). Technoculture as a “culture revolution” in network society. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-058-9_18
• Winter, A. (2019). Online hate: From the far-right to the ‘alt-right’ and from the margins to the mainstream. In K. Lumsden & E. Harmer (Eds.), Online othering (pp. 39–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Zehring, M. and Domahidi, E. (2023). German corona protest mobilizers on telegram and their relations to the far right: a network and topic analysis. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231155106
• Zhang, X., & Davis, M. (2022). E-extremism: A conceptual framework for studying the online far right. New Media & Society, 26(5), 2954–2970. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221098360