Yield and Yield Components of Greenhouse, Field and Seed Bed Grown Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Plantlets

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 1, 125 - 129, 01.06.2005

E. Özkaynak B. Samancı

Öz

The aim of the research was to determine field, greenhouse and seed bed performance of plantlets derived from in vitro propagated plantlets of three potato cultivars. Generally, higher values were obtained from the mid-early maturing cultivar Marabel, compare to other cultivars (early cultivar Velox and and mid-early cultivar Concorde) for tuber yield, tuber number and average tuber weight. For these yield components, in the field and seed bed plantlets were found lower values than greenhouse plantlets. The percentage of >4 g tuber weight was obtained for approximately 80 % in greenhouse and field plantlets and between 45 to 55 % in seed bed plantlets. These results indicated that greenhouse and seed bed potato plantlets can be used effectively to expand production of basic minituber seed stocks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Solanum tuberosum L., plantlet, tuber yield, minituber

Sera, Tarla ve Tohum Yatağı Koşullarında Büyütülen Patates ( Solanum tuberosum L.) Fidelerinde Verim ve Verim Komponentlerinin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu yatağı performansını belirlemek olmuştur. Yumru verimi, yumru sayısı ve ortalama yumru ağırlığı bakımından orta erkenci Marabel çeşidinde, genel olarak diğer çeşitlere (erkenci Velox ve orta erkenci Concorde) göre daha yüksek değerler elde edilmiştir. Bu verim komponentleri bakımından tarladaki ve tohum yatağındaki fidelerde sera koşullarında büyütülen fidelere göre daha düşük değerler bulunmuştur. Sera ve tarla fidelerinde >4 g yumru yüzdesi yaklaşık % 80 ve tohum yatağında % 45 ile % 55 arasında saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, sera ve tohum yatağı patates fideleri temel mini yumru tohumluk stoklarının üretimi için etkili olarak kullanılabilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Solanum tuberosum L., Fide, Yumru Verimi, Mini Yumru

Kaynakça

• Ahloowalia, B.S., 1994. Production and performance of potato mini-tubers. Euphytica. 75 (3): 163- 172.
• Dodds, J.H., Silva-Rodriguez D. and Tovar, P., 1992. Micropropagation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol, 19, High-Tech and Micropropagation III, Y. P. S. Bajaj, Ed., Springer-Verlag, Newyork pp.91-106.
• Freed, R., Einensmith, S.P., Guetz, S., Reicosky, D., Smail V.W., and Wolberg, P., 1989. User’s Guide to MSTAT-C Analysis of Agronomic Research Experiments. Michigan State University, USA.
• Grigoriadou, K. and Leventakis, N., 1999. Large scale commercial production of potato minitubers, using in vitro techniques. Potato Research. 42 (3- 4): 607-610.
• Gopal, J. and Minocha J.L.,1997. Effectiveness of selection at microtuber crop level in potato. Plant Breeding. 116: 293-295.
• Jones, E.D., 1988. A current assessment of in vitro culture and other rapid multiplication methods in North America and Europa. American Potato Journal. 65: 209-220.
• Kaur, J., Pamar, U., Gill, R., Sindhu A.S., and Gosal S.S., 2000. Efficient method for micropropagation of potato through minituber production. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 5 (2):163-167.
• Lommen, W.J.M., 1995. Basic studies on the production and performance of potato minitubers. Thesis Landbouw Universiteit Wageningen, 181 pp.
• Lommen, W.J.M., 1999. Causes for low tuber yields of transplants from in vitro potato plantlets of early cultivars after field planting. Journal of Agricultural Science. 133:275-284.
• Lommen, W.J.M. and Struik P.C., 1992. Production of potato minitubers by repeated harvesting: effects of crop husbandry on yield parameters. Potato Research. 35: 419-432.
• Lommen, W.J.M. and Struik P.C., 1994. Field performance of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and conventional seed tubers: crop establishments and yield formation. Potato Research. 37:301-313.
• Lommen, W.J.M. and Struik P.C., 1995. Field performance of potato minitubers with different fresh weights and conventional seed tubers : multiplication factors and progeny yield variation. Potato Research. 38: 159-169.
• Murashige, T. and Skoog, F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473- 497.
• Naik, P.S., Sarkar D., and Gaur P.C., 1998. Yield components of potato microtuber: in vitro production and field performance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 133:91-99.
• Pruski, K., Astatkie, T., Duplessis, P. Lewis, T., Nowak, J. and Struik, P.C., 2003. Use of jasmonate for conditiong of potato plantlets and microtubers in greenhouse production of minitubers. Amer. Jour. of Potato Research. 80: 183-193.
• Ritter, E., Angulo, B., Riga, P., Herran, C., Relluso J. and San Jose, M., 2001. Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems for the production of potato minitubers. Potato Research. 44: 127-135.
• Struik P.C. and Lommen W.J.M., 1990. Production, storage and use of micro- and minitubers. In Proceedings 11th Triennial Conference of European Association for Potato Research, Edinburgh, U.K. pp. 122-133.
• Struik P.C., and Lommen W.J.M., 1999. Improving the field performance of micro-minitubers. Potato Research. 42(3-4): 59-568.
• Vosatka, M., and Gryndler M., 2000. Response of micropropagated potatoes transplanted to peat media to post-citro inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil bacteria. Applied Soil Ecology. 15:145-152.