In Vitro Hybrid Plant Regeneration by Embryo Rescue in Interspecific Hybridization between Some Cucumis Species

Yıl 2004, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 175 - 182, 01.12.2004

G. Çağlar S. Bağcı

Öz

In this study, the possibility of gene transferring by interspecific hybridization between C. melo and C. sativus, and also the usage of C. melo var. flexuosus as a bridge between the former two species were investigated. Reciprocal crosses were made among C. melo, C. sativus and C. melo var. flexuosus. Two weeks after controlled pollinations, fruits were harvested and surface sterilized by 30 % hypochlorite. The embryos were rescued from the seeds and in vitro cultured on MS solid media. The percentages of fruit settings were 50 % in C. flexuosus x C. sativus; 46.6 % in C. flexuosus x C. melo; 53.3 % in C. melo x C. flexuosus; 33.3 % in C. melo x C. sativus; 53.3 % in C. sativus x C. flexuosus; 43.3 % in C. sativus x C . melo. The seed number per fruit was lowest in C. flexuosus x C. sativus (117.0) and highest in C. melo x C. sativus (432.8). However, many of the seeds in the combination of C. melo x C. sativus were empty and the percentage of seeds with embryo was lowest (32.2 %). In the combination of C. melo and C. flexuosus, most of the seeds (over 90 %) contained embryos. The plant regeneration rate ranged from 12.5 to % 25.0. A total of 32 plantlets was obtained in vitro from these embryos.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cucumis, Interspecific hybridization, embryo rescue

Bazı Cucumis Türleri Arasındaki Melezlemelerde Embriyo Kurtarma Yoluyla InVitro Hibrit Bitki Regenerasyonu

Öz

Bu çalışmada Cucumis cinsi içinde yer alan C. melo ve C. sativus arasında türler arası melezleme ile gen aktarımını sağlayabilme ve C. melo var. flexuosus’u iki tür arasında köprü türü olarak kullanabilme olanakları araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla C. melo, C. sativus ve C. melo var. flexuosus arasında melezlemeler yapılmıştır. Kontrollu tozlamalardan iki hafta sonra hasat edilerek laboratuvara getirilen ve % 30'luk hipoklorit çözeltisinde yüzey dezenfeksiyonuna tabii tutulan meyvelerdeki tohumlar açılarak içerisindeki embriyolar çıkarılıp MS ortamında in vitro kültüre alınmıştır. Melezlemelerdeki meyve tutum oranları C. flexuosus x C. sativus tozlanmasında % 50, C. flexuosus x C. melo’da % 46.6, C. melo x C. flexuosus’da % 53.3 ve C . melo x C. sativus’da % 33.3, C. sativus x C. flexuosus’da % 53.3, C. sativus x C. melo’da % 43.3 olmuştur. Meyve başına tohum sayısı ortalama 117 adet ile C. flexuosus x C. sativus kombinasyonunda en düşük, 432.8 ile C. melo x C. sativus’da en yüksek bulunmuştur. Ancak C. melo x C. sativus’daki tohumların çoğunun boş olduğu ve embriyo içeren tohum oranının % 32.2 ile en düşük düzeyde kaldığı görülmüştür. Buna karşın C. melo ile C. flexuosus arasında yapılan melezlemelerde tohumların tamamına yakınının (%90) embriyo içerdiği belirlenmiştir. Embriyoların bitkiye dönüşüm oranı % 12.5 ile % 25.0 arasında gerçekleşmiştir. Bu embriyolardan in vitro kültürde toplam 32 adet bitki gelişmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cucumis, Türler arası melezleme, Embriyo kurtarma

Kaynakça

• Bowley, S.R. and Taylor, N.L., 1987. Introgressive hybridization. In: B.R. Christie (Ed.): CRC Handbook of plant science in agriculture. Vol.1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
• Beharav, A. and Cohen Y., 1994. Effect of gamma radiation on vitality and fertilization ability of Cucumis melo and C. metuliferus pollen. Cucurbit Genetic Cooperative Rpt. 17:94-96.
• Chartterjee, M. and More, T.A., 1991a. Interspesific hybridization in Cucumis species. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 14:69.
• Chartterjee, M. and More, T.A., 1991b. Techniques to overcome barrier of interspecific hybridization in Cucumis. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 14:66-67.
• Chen, J.F. and Adelberg, J., 2000. Interspesific hybridization in Cucumis-Progress, problems, and perspectives. HortScience, 35 (1), 11-15.
• Chen, J.F. and Staub, J., 1997. Attempts at colchicine doubling of an interspesific hybrid of C.sativus L.x C.hystrix Chakr. Cucurbit Genetic Cooperative Rpt. 20:24-26.
• Chen, J.F., Staub, J.,Tashiro, Y., Isshiki, S. and Miyazaki, S., 1997. Successful interspecific hybridization between Cucumis sativus L. and C.hystrix Chakr. Euphytica 96:3, 413-419.
• Chen, J.F., Adelberg, J.W, Staub, J. E, Skorupska, H.T. and Rhodes, B.B. 1998. A new synthetic amphidiploid in Cucumis from a C.sativus x C.hystrix F1 interspecific hybrid. In: J. McCreight (ed.). Cucurbitaceae’98-Evoluation and enhancement of Cucurbit germplasm. ASHA Press, Alexandria, Va. p. 336-339.
• Chen, J.F., Zhuang, F.Y., Qian, C.T., Yosuke, T., Staub, J. and Kirkbride, J., 2001. A synthetic species of Cucumis - C.hytivus Chen and Kirkbride, and its potential for improvemnet of cucumber germplasm. 2nd International Symposium on Cucurbits. Abst.:24, 28 Sep – 1 Oct., 2001, Japan.
• Custers, J.B.M. and Den Nijs, A.P.M., 1986. Effects of Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), environment, and genotpye in overcoming hybridization barriers between Cucumis species. Euphytica 35:639-647.
• Deakin, J.R., Bohn, G.W. and Whitaker, T.W., 1971. Intersipesific hybridization in Cucumis. Econ. Bot., 25:195-211.
• Debeaujon, I. and Branchard, M., 1990. Somatic hybridization of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) with Kiwano (Cucumis metuliferus Naud.) and Squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) by protoplast electrofusion. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt.13:36-39.
• De Vaulx, R.D., 1979. Pollen germination in interspecific crosses between muskmelon and some wild Cucumis species. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 2:20-21.
• Fellner, M.P., Binarova, P. and Lebeda, A, 1996. İsolation and fusion of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis melo protoplast. In: Gomez-Guillamon, Soria, C., Cuartero, J., Tores, J.A., and Fernandez-Munoz, R. (Eds.). Cucurbits towards 2000. Proc. 6th Eucarpia Mtg. On Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding, Malaga, Spain.
• Kho,Y.O., Den Nijs, A.P.M and Franken, J., 1980. Intersipesific hybridization in Cucumis L. II.The crossability of species, and investigation in vitro pollen tube growth and seed set. Euphytica 29:661-672.
• Kishi, Y. and Fujishita, N., 1969. Studies on interspesific hybridization in the genus Cucumis. I. Pollen germination and pollen tube growth in selfings and incompatible crossings. J.Jpn.Soc. Hort.Sci. 38: 329-334.
• Kishi, Y. and Fujishita, N., 1970. Studies on interspesific hybridization in the genus Cucumis. II. Pollen tube growth fertilization and embryogenesis of post-fertilization stage in incompatible crossing. J.Jpn.Soc. Hort.Sci. 39: 51-57.
• Lebeda, A., Kubalakova, M., Kristkova, E., Navratilova, B., Dolezal., K., Dolezal, J. and Lysak, M., 1999. Morphological and physiological characteristics of plants issued from an interspecific hybridization of Cucumis sativus X Cucumis melo. Acta Hortic. :492, 149-155.
• Leppick, E.E.,1996. Searching gene centers of the genus Cucumis. Euphytica 15:323-328.
• Lower, R.L. and Edwards, M.D., 1986. Cucumber breeding. p 173-207. In: Basset, M.J. (Ed.). Breeding vegetable crops. AVI, Westport, Conn.
• Norton, J.D., 1978. Interspecific crosses of Cucumis species. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 1:39.
• Ondrej, V., Navratilova, B. and Lebeda, A., 2001a. In vitro cultivation of Cucumis sativus ovules after fertilization. 2nd International Symposium on Cucurbits. Abst.:101, 28 Sep – 1 Oct., 2001, Japan.
• Ondrej, V., Navratilova, B. and Lebeda, A., 2001b. Determination of the Crossing Barriers in Hybridization of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis melo. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 24:1-5.
• Oost, E.H. and Den Nijs, A.P.M. 1979. Mentor pollen as a tool in interspecific hybridization in Cucumis. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 2:43-44.
• Perl-Treves, R., and Galun, E., 1985. The Cucumis plastome: Physical map, intrageneric variation and phylogenetic relationships. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:417-429.
• Perl-Treves, R., Zamir, D., Navot, N. and Galun, E., 1985. Phylogen of Cucumis based on isozyme variability and its comparison with plastome phylogeny. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:430-436.
• Pierik, R.L.M., 1989. İn vitro culture of higher plants. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands. p 344.
• Robinson R.W. and Kowalewski, E. 1978. Interspesific hybridization of Cucumis. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 1:40.
• Robinson R.W. and Decker-Walters, D.S., 1997. Cucurbits. Cab International, Wallingford, UK. p 225.
• Robinson, W.R., 2001. Breeding cucurbita for dısease resistance. 2nd International Symposium on Cucurbits. Abst.:20, 28 Sep – 1 Oct., 2001, Japan.
• Singh, B.P., 1991. Interspesific hybridization in between new and old–world species of Luffa and its phylogenetic implication. Cytologia, 56:359-365.
• Singh, A.K., and Yadava, K.S., 1984. An analysis of Interspesific hybrids and phylogenetic implications in Cucumis (Cucurbitaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 147:237-252
• Stebbings, G.L., 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Addison-Wesley, London, p 216.
• Subha, M.M., Gopalakrishan, P.K. and Peter, K.V. 1986. Compatibility among Cucumis melo varietes inodorus, conomon, flexuosus, momordica and utilissimus. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 9:78-80.
• Tang, F.A. and Punja, Z.K., 1989. Isolation and culture of protoplasts of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis metiliferus and methods for their fusion. Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 12:29-32.
• Van der Knapp, B.J. and Ruiter A.C.1978. An interspecific cross between cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and muskmelon (Cucumis melo). Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative Rpt. 1:6-8.
• Weeden, N.F. and Robinson R.W., 1986. Allozym segregation ratios in the interspesific cross Cucurbita maxima x C ecuadorensis suggest that hybrid breakdown is not caused by minor alterations in chromosome structure. Genetics 114: 593-609.