Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yüz Yüze İletişimde Yayımcıların Rolü

Yıl 1993, Cilt: 5-6 Sayı: 1-2, 139 - 144, 01.12.1993

Öz

More than one way of technology transfer is practiced in extension. Depending on the circumstances extension agent may use one of them or combination of them to reach the farmer more effectively. Face to face communication (FFC) is one of the most important method of extension. Scholar of extension such as Francis and Rawlins-Branan (1986); Ashby, et al (1990) discuss that FFC is the most effective way of technology transfer, although it is highly costly method of extension. Communication techniques is the intrinsic element of FFC and achievement of the communication technique used hinges mainly upon skills of extension agent. In this paper, focus has been done on the FFC, and that extension agent's role has been discussed.

Kaynakça

  • Anon., 1990. ’Farmers group and workshops’ in Farmer first Chambers et al (ed). Intermedlate Technology Publicat1ons. UK.
  • Ashby, J., Quiros,C. and Rivers,Y., 1990. ’Experience with group techniques in Colombia’ in Farmer first. Chambers et al (ed). Intermedlate Technology Publications. UK.
  • Ballanyne, A.O., 1986. Extension work in the small farm sector. Agric. Admin. & Extension 24 (1987) 141-147.
  • Benor, D. and Harrison, J.O., 1977. Agricultural extension: the training and visit system. Washington, WB.
  • Coombs, P.H. and Ahmed, M., 1974. Attacking rural poverty. World Bank. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Francis, P. and Rawlins-Branan, M.J., 1987. The extension system and small-scale farmers; a case study from Northern Zambia. Agric. Admin. & Extension 26 : 185-196.
  • Maunder, A.H., 1972. Agricultural extension: a reference manual. Rome. FAO.
  • Mcquail,D. and Windahl.S., 1984. Communication models. Longman. London.
  • Roling,N., 1988. Extension science. Cambridge University Press. UK.
  • Sacile, A.H., 1965. Extension in rural communities. Oxford University Press.
  • Van Den Ban, A.W. and Hawkins, H.S., 1987. Agricultural extension. Longman scientific & Technical. UK.

The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication

Yıl 1993, Cilt: 5-6 Sayı: 1-2, 139 - 144, 01.12.1993

Öz

More than one way of technology transfer is practiced in extension. Depending on the circumstances extension agent may use one of them or combination of them to reach the farmer more effectively. Face to face communication (FFC) is one of the most important method of extension. Scholar of extension such as Francis and Rawlins-Branan (1986); Ashby, et al (1990) discuss that FFC is the most effective way of technology transfer, although it is highly costly method of extension. Communication techniques is the intrinsic element of FFC and achievement of the communication technique used hinges mainly upon skills of extension agent. In this paper, focus has been done on the FFC, and that extension agent's role has been discussed.

Kaynakça

  • Anon., 1990. ’Farmers group and workshops’ in Farmer first Chambers et al (ed). Intermedlate Technology Publicat1ons. UK.
  • Ashby, J., Quiros,C. and Rivers,Y., 1990. ’Experience with group techniques in Colombia’ in Farmer first. Chambers et al (ed). Intermedlate Technology Publications. UK.
  • Ballanyne, A.O., 1986. Extension work in the small farm sector. Agric. Admin. & Extension 24 (1987) 141-147.
  • Benor, D. and Harrison, J.O., 1977. Agricultural extension: the training and visit system. Washington, WB.
  • Coombs, P.H. and Ahmed, M., 1974. Attacking rural poverty. World Bank. John Hopkins University Press.
  • Francis, P. and Rawlins-Branan, M.J., 1987. The extension system and small-scale farmers; a case study from Northern Zambia. Agric. Admin. & Extension 26 : 185-196.
  • Maunder, A.H., 1972. Agricultural extension: a reference manual. Rome. FAO.
  • Mcquail,D. and Windahl.S., 1984. Communication models. Longman. London.
  • Roling,N., 1988. Extension science. Cambridge University Press. UK.
  • Sacile, A.H., 1965. Extension in rural communities. Oxford University Press.
  • Van Den Ban, A.W. and Hawkins, H.S., 1987. Agricultural extension. Longman scientific & Technical. UK.
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ziraat Mühendisliği
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

E. Oktay Bu kişi benim

T. Kumuk Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 1993
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 1993 Cilt: 5-6 Sayı: 1-2

Kaynak Göster

APA Oktay, E., & Kumuk, T. (1993). The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 5-6(1-2), 139-144.
AMA Oktay E, Kumuk T. The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. Aralık 1993;5-6(1-2):139-144.
Chicago Oktay, E., ve T. Kumuk. “The Role of the Extension Agent In the Face to Face Communication”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 5-6, sy. 1-2 (Aralık 1993): 139-44.
EndNote Oktay E, Kumuk T (01 Aralık 1993) The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 5-6 1-2 139–144.
IEEE E. Oktay ve T. Kumuk, “The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication”, Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, c. 5-6, sy. 1-2, ss. 139–144, 1993.
ISNAD Oktay, E. - Kumuk, T. “The Role of the Extension Agent In the Face to Face Communication”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 5-6/1-2 (Aralık 1993), 139-144.
JAMA Oktay E, Kumuk T. The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 1993;5-6:139–144.
MLA Oktay, E. ve T. Kumuk. “The Role of the Extension Agent In the Face to Face Communication”. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, c. 5-6, sy. 1-2, 1993, ss. 139-44.
Vancouver Oktay E, Kumuk T. The Role of the Extension Agent in the Face to Face Communication. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture. 1993;5-6(1-2):139-44.