USABILITY vs. ECOLOGY: DEFINING GOOD DESIGN FROM DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES
Öz
This paper investigates the interplay between usability and ecological design in the context of interactive media, seeking to address the challenge of integrating these frameworks into design practices. While usability has long been a cornerstone of Human-Computer Interaction design by emphasizing user-centered metrics, ecological design advocates for a more holistic perspective that transcends anthropocentric views. By comparing the System Usability Scale with the Ecological Systems Scale, this research evaluates the effectiveness of integrating ecological heuristics into usability-focused design processes. The findings reveal a correlation between usability and ECOS scores, suggesting that foundational design capabilities are essential for successful ecological design implementation. Perceived conflicts between usability and ecological principles were attributed to the fast consumption demands of the media design industry rather than intrinsic contradictions. This study advocates for the development of educational frameworks that support ongoing discussions and iterative revisions in design processes. Ultimately, it aims to contribute to a more sustainable design practice that balances user needs with ecological integrity.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Sustainability, Ecology, Usability, Interaction Design, Design heuristics
Kaynakça
- Abram, D. (2010). Becoming animal: An earthly cosmology. Pantheon Books.
- Anjos, T. P., Matias, M., & Gontijo, L. A. (2012). The usability of a product can be an ally of sustainability. Work, 41(Supplement 1), 2117–2121.
- Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574-594.
- Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114-123.
- Blevis, E., Bødker, S., Flach, J., Forlizzi, J., Jung, H., Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B., & Rizzo, A. (2015). Ecological perspectives in HCI: Promise, problems, and potential. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2401-2404). ACM.
- Brezet, H., Hemel, C. v., UNEP IE Cleaner Production Network, Rathenau Instituut, & Technische Universiteit Delft. (1997). Ecodesign: A promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. United Nations Environment Programme, Industry and Environment, Cleaner Production; Rathenau Institute; Delft University of Technology.
- Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan et al. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189-194).
- DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., & Brynjarsdóttir, H. (2010). Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1975-1984). ACM.
- Egenhoefer, R. B. (Ed.). (2017). Routledge handbook of sustainable design. Routledge.
- Hansson, L. Å. E. J., Cerratto Pargman, T., & Pargman, D. S. (2021, May). A decade of sustainable HCI: Connecting SHCI to the sustainable development goals. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-19).
