Derleme

Risky Baby Rehabilitation

Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Risky Baby Rehabilitation

Öz

When we look at the definition of risky babies, the first to come to mind is preterm babies born before the 32nd week of pregnancy, but also postterm newborns, term low birth weight babies (<2500 gr), and babies with congenital anomalies are included in this class. With developing technology, it is possible to keep more risky babies alive. It is known that premature babies, compared to term babies, show suboptimal motor development behavior and self-regulation problems in all subsystems (mental, developmental, neurobehavioral, motor) in the 3rd and 6th months of their follow-up. Early neurodevelopmental assessments of high-risk newborns should be performed, deficiencies should be determined, and physiotherapeutic intervention and family-centered rehabilitation programs should be initiated early in the needed areas. Although premature babies are thought to have problems only in the motor area, they now have difficulties in many neurodevelopmental stages, such as social, behavioral, life skills, sleep, language, nutrition, mental health, toilet habits, and communication. Some premature babies are diagnosed with autism and attention deficit, and hyperactivity disorder over time. This group of children with special needs should be closely monitored at every stage of their lives. 10% of preterm babies are diagnosed with cerebral palsy later in life. Cerebral palsy presents with non-progressive damage to the central nervous system as well as progressive problems in the musculoskeletal system. Parents, who were left out of treatment processes in the past, are now at the center of the rehabilitation team. It should be kept in mind that healthy babies will become healthy adults in the future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

risky baby, rehabilitation, neurodevelopmental assesment, prematurity, cerebral palsy

Kaynakça

  1. 1.Ohuma EO, Moller AB, Bradley E, Chakwera S, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Lewin A, et al. National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2023 Oct 7;402(10409):1261-1271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4. Erratum in: Lancet. 2024 Feb 17;403(10427):618. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00267-8. PMID: 37805217.
  2. 2.Harrison MS, Goldenberg RL. Global burden of prematurity. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Apr;21(2):74-9. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 28. PMID: 26740166.
  3. 3.Cheong JLY, Burnett AC, Treyvaud K, Spittle AJ. Early environment and long-term outcomes of preterm babies. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020 Jan;127(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02121-w. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID: 31863172.
  4. 4. Koldewijn K, van Wassenaer A, Wolf MJ, Meijssen D, Houtzager B, Beelen A, et al. A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight babies: outcome at 24 months. J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;156(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Nov 2. PMID: 19880139.
  5. 5.Picciolini O, Montirosso R, Porro M, Giannì ML, Mosca F. Neurofunctional assessment at term equivalent age can predict 3-year neurodevelopmental outcomes in very low birth weight babies. Acta Paediatr. 2016 Feb;105(2):e47-53. doi: 10.1111/apa.13248. Epub 2015 Dec 4. PMID: 26497156.
  6. 6.Koldewijn K, van Wassenaer A, Wolf MJ, Meijssen D, Houtzager B, Beelen A, Kok J, Nollet F. A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight babies: outcome at 24 months. J Pediatr. 2010 Mar;156(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Nov 2. PMID: 19880139.
  7. 7. Einspieler C, Prechtl HF. Prechtl's assessment of general movements: a diagnostic tool for the functional assessment of the young nervous system. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11(1):61-7. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20051. PMID: 15856440.
  8. 8.Hadders-Algra M, Tacke U, Pietz J, Rupp A, Philippi H. Standardized Baby NeuroDevelopmental Assessment developmental and socio-emotional scales: reliability and predictive value in an at-risk population. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Jul;62(7):845-853. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14423. Epub 2019 Dec 13. PMID: 31837010; PMCID: PMC7317584.
  9. 9.Mikelić VM, Bartolović J, Kosicek T, Crnković M. Educated parent as a key member of rehabilitation team. Acta Clin Croat. 2011 Dec;50(4):469-73. PMID: 22649875.
  10. 10. https://ibaip.org/

Kaynak Göster

APA
Koca, T. T. (2025). Risky Baby Rehabilitation. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi, 34(3), 237-242. https://doi.org/10.17827/aktd.1566677
AMA
1.Koca TT. Risky Baby Rehabilitation. aktd. 2025;34(3):237-242. doi:10.17827/aktd.1566677
Chicago
Koca, Tuba Tülay. 2025. “Risky Baby Rehabilitation”. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi 34 (3): 237-42. https://doi.org/10.17827/aktd.1566677.
EndNote
Koca TT (01 Eylül 2025) Risky Baby Rehabilitation. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi 34 3 237–242.
IEEE
[1]T. T. Koca, “Risky Baby Rehabilitation”, aktd, c. 34, sy 3, ss. 237–242, Eyl. 2025, doi: 10.17827/aktd.1566677.
ISNAD
Koca, Tuba Tülay. “Risky Baby Rehabilitation”. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi 34/3 (01 Eylül 2025): 237-242. https://doi.org/10.17827/aktd.1566677.
JAMA
1.Koca TT. Risky Baby Rehabilitation. aktd. 2025;34:237–242.
MLA
Koca, Tuba Tülay. “Risky Baby Rehabilitation”. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi, c. 34, sy 3, Eylül 2025, ss. 237-42, doi:10.17827/aktd.1566677.
Vancouver
1.Tuba Tülay Koca. Risky Baby Rehabilitation. aktd. 01 Eylül 2025;34(3):237-42. doi:10.17827/aktd.1566677