Müller's Muscles: Three Different Smooth Muscles of the Eye and Orbit
Öz
Purpose: The eponym “Müller’s muscle” has been used in various textbooks and academic articles to refer collectively to three different smooth muscles: orbital muscle, superior tarsal muscle and the circular fibers of the ciliary muscle. The aim of this review is to highlight the terminological confusion created in the literature by the use of the Müller’s muscle eponym as a common name for three different muscles associated with the eye and orbit.
Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in academic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science to clarify clarify the appropriate usage of the term “Müller’s muscle”. Additionally, the descriptions of these muscles in leading medical school sources, atlases, and textbooks were examined. The detailed topographical locations, anatomical and morphological characteristics, histological structures, innervation and vascularisation, and clinical syndromes of the muscles were presented in a comparative manner.
Conclusion: We believe that our study will contribute to preventing naming confusion regarding these muscles, collectively referred to as ‘Müller's muscle,’ in future anatomy atlases, clinical guidebooks, and scientific studies.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Destekleyen Kurum
Authors declared no financial support
Etik Beyan
Since it is a compilation article, an ethics committee was not required.
Teşekkür
The authors would like to thank architect Yiğit Kağan KARAGÖZ for modeling the visual of ciliary muscle.
Kaynakça
- REFERENCES 1. Cornelius CP, Mayer P, Ehrenfeld M, Metzger MC. The Orbits— Anatomical features in view of innovative surgical methods. Facial Plast Surg. 2014;30:487–508.
- 2. Cho KH, Lee HS, Katori Y, Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Murakami G, Abe S. Deep fat of the face revisited. Clin. Anat. 2013; 26:347–356.
- 3. Wilden A, Feiser J, Wöhler A, Isik Z, Bendella H, Angelov DN. Anatomy of the human orbital muscle (OM): Features of its detailed topography, syntopy and morphology. Ann Anat. 2017;211:39-45.
- 4. De Battista JC, Zimmer LA, Theodosopoulos PV, Froelich SC, Keller JT. Anatomy of the inferior orbital fissure: implications for endoscopic cranial base surgery. J. Neurol. Surg. B: Skull Base. 2012;73:132–138.
- 5. Rodríguez-Vázquez JF, Mérida-Velasco JR, Arráez-Aybar LA, Jiménez-Collado J. Anatomic relationships of the orbital muscle of Müller in human fetuses. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 1999;20:341-344.
- 6. Von Lanz T, Wachsmuth W. Praktische Anatomie. Kopf. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979:481–482.
- 7. Standring S. Gray's Anatomy. 41st ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2016.
- 8. De Haan AB, Willekens B, Klooster J, Los AA, van Zwietwn J, Botha CP, et al.. The prenatal development of the humanorbit. Strabismus. 2006;14:51–56.
- 9. Osanai H, Abe SI, Rodríguez-Vázquez J, Verdugo-López S, Murakami G, Ohguro H. Human orbital muscle: a new point of view from the fetal development of extraocular connective tissues. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52(3): 1501-1506.
- 10. Arifoğlu Y. Her Yönüyle Anatomi. 3. Baskı. İstanbul, İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi, 2021.
