EN
TR
An Investigation of Turkey’s Entrepreneurial and Innovative University Index for 2016 and 2017 via ORESTE and Factor Analysis
Abstract
Turkey Entrepreneurial and Innovative University Index is published every year by TÜBİTAK starting from 2012. There are 5 dimensions in the index. Using the index, scientific activities of universities as well as industry and other collaborations can be considered together in the same platform. Entrepreneurship is an umbrella term that helps to better understand the opportunities that may arise in the realization of the social and commercial activities of employees and individuals in daily life, working life and society. This arrangement of the universities under the term of Entrepreneurship leads the way to universities for better future planning. In this study, published for 2016 and 2017 by TUBITAK Turkey’s Entrepreneurial and Innovative University Index values were examined via ORESTE and Factor Analysis. According to the related techniques, the changes in university rankings are explained.
Keywords
References
- Bouyssou, D. (2009). Outranking methods Outranking Methods. In C. A. Floudas & P. M. Pardalos (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Optimization (pp. 2887–2893). Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0_495Chatterjee, P. ve Chakraborty, S. (2013). Advanced Manufacturing Systems Selection Using ORESTE Method. Int. J. Advanced Operations Management, 5(4), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAOM.2013.058896Delhaye, C., Teghem, J. ve Kunsch, P. (1991). Application of the ORESTE method to a nuclear waste management problem. Lnwrnational Journal of Production Economics, 24, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(91)90150-RDinçer, S. E. (2011). The Structural Analysis of Key Indicators of Turkish Manufacturing Industry: ORESTE and MAPPAC Applications. European Journal of Scientific Research, 60(1), 6–18.EU Commission Final Report of Export Group (2008). Entrepreneurship In Higher Education, Especially In Non-Business Studies. http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/entrepreneurship/support_measures/index.htmFigueira, J., Greco, S. ve Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis State of the Art Surveys, 78, 859–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. ve Figueira, J. R. (2016). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. springer (Vol. 1 e 2). https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L. ve Raiffa, H. (1999). Smart Choices : A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions. Harvard Business School Press.Jafari, H. (2013). Identification and Prioritization of Grain Discharging Operations Risks by Using ORESTE Method. American Journal of Public Health Research, 1(8), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajphr-1-8-4Mardia, K.V., Kent, J.T. ve Bibby J.M. (1979). Multivariate Analysis. Academic PressMartel, J.-M. ve Matarazzo, B. (2016). Other Outranking Approaches. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (pp. 221–282).Özdemir, A. (2016). Karar Süreci. Ş. Lezki (Ed.), Karar Modelleri (ss. 2–17). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.Pastijn, H. ve Leysen, J. (1989). Constructing an outranking relation with ORESTE. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 12(10–11), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(89)90367-1R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.Raubenheimer, J. (2004). An item selection procedure to maximize scale reliability and validity. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(4), 59-64.SPSS Inc. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY:IBM Corp
- TÜBİTAK. (n.d.). Girişimci ve Yenilikçi Üniversite Endeksi. Retrieved from https://www.tubitak.gov.tr/tr/kurumsal/politikalar/icerik-girisimci-ve-yenilikci-universite-endeksiÜrper, Y. (2013). Girişimcilik, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları No:1955, Eskişehir.
Details
Primary Language
Turkish
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
December 31, 2018
Submission Date
June 5, 2018
Acceptance Date
November 9, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 2
APA
Er, F., & Yıldız, E. (2018). Türkiye Girişimci ve Yenilikçi Üniversite Endeksi 2016 ve 2017 Sonuçlarının ORESTE ve Faktör Analizi ile İncelenmesi. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(2), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.431034
Cited By
YÖK İZLEME VE DEĞERLENDİRME ÖLÇÜTLERİNE GÖRE ÜNİVERSİTE SIRALAMALARI: FARKLI YÖNTEMLER SIRALAMALARI NE KADAR ETKİLEYEBİLİR?
Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute
https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.681381Bölgesel Kalkınma Odaklı Misyon Farklılaşması ve İhtisaslaşma Projesinde Yer Alan Pilot Üniversitelerin Performanslarının IDOCRIW Tabanlı GRA Yöntemi ile Karşılaştırılması
Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1193307Belirli Süreyle Temettü Dağıtan Şirketlerin Performanslarının İkili Üstünlük Algoritmaları İle Analizi: Oreste Uygulaması
Kırklareli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.53306/klujfeas.1063843GİRİŞİMCİ VE YENİLİKÇİ ÜNİVERSİTELERİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN ÖLÇÜLMESİ
Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.877099Evaluation of the Entrepreneurial and Innovative Universities in Turkey through MultipleCriteria Decision Making Methods
Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.799505Türkiye’deki Bazı Üniversitelerin Girişimcilik ve Yenilikçilik Performanslarının Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi
Journal of Higher Education and Science
https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1105382