BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, - , 01.01.2005

Önder Çetin

Öz

The aim of this work is to comprehend and clarify the relation between two religious traditions Islam -which seems as taking the form of agnosticism-, and questioning the position of the Bahâ’î identity towards Islam on the framework of “recognition” offered by Hegel in his dialectic of “Lordship and Bondage”. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, - , 01.01.2005

Önder Çetin

Öz

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Önder Çetin Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2005
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2002 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çetin, Ö. (2005). Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 1(1).
AMA Çetin Ö. Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. Ocak 2005;1(1).
Chicago Çetin, Önder. “Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 1, sy. 1 (Ocak 2005).
EndNote Çetin Ö (01 Ocak 2005) Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 1 1
IEEE Ö. Çetin, “Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith”, Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, c. 1, sy. 1, 2005.
ISNAD Çetin, Önder. “Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations 1/1 (Ocak2005).
JAMA Çetin Ö. Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. 2005;1.
MLA Çetin, Önder. “Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith”. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, c. 1, sy. 1, 2005.
Vancouver Çetin Ö. Recognition and Identity: the case of the Bahâ’î Faith. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations. 2005;1(1).