Otonom Silah Sistemlerinin ve Doğabilecek Sorumluluk Meselesinin Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Yıl 2024, , 485 - 513, 01.08.2024

Kenan Dülger , Özge Tanyeli Sökük

https://doi.org/10.54699/andhd.1386667

Öz

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin yaygın olarak kullanımına bağlı olarak her geçen gün teknolojik alt yapılarını daha fazla geliştiren devletlerin söz konusu teknoloji bağımlılığı, aynı zamanda kendileri açısından ayrı bir risk alanını da beraberinde getirmektedir. Teknolojiden her alanda yararlanıldığı gibi devletlerin kendilerine en fazla katkıyı savunma ve güvenlik alanlarında elde edebilmeleri, birinci derecede önem arz etmektedir. Zira gerek sıcak çatışmalarda gerekse caydırıcılık gücü bağlamında, her devlet kendi askeri alt yapısını sürekli yenileme ihtiyacı içindedir. Teknoloji ve bilimin gelişimi sürecinde ortaya çıkan en önemli sonuç ise insan varlığının ve katkısının giderek azalmaya başlamış olmasıdır. Savaş ve/veya silahlı çatışmalar alanında insan faktörünün giderek yerini teknolojiye bırakmaktadır. Teknolojik gelişmeler sürecinde devletlerin bahsi geçen alanlarda otonom silah sistemleri kullanımı, her geçen gün artmaktadır. Lakin otonom silahların kullanımı ile ilgili çoğu uluslararası örgüt ve devlet nezdinde uluslararası düzenleme boşlukları doğduğu düşünüldüğü gibi bu boşlukların ne şekilde doldurulacağı da açık değildir. Bu çalışmada, belirtilen hukuki boşlukların doldurulup doldurulamayacağı, hangi tür uluslararası insancıl hukuk kurallarının uygulanacağı ve bu çerçevede ortaya çıkabilecek sorumluluk sorunu ele alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Otonom Silah Sistemleri, Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk, Yapay Zekâ, Sorumluluk, Uluslararası Suçlar.

Evaluation of Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Issue of Responsibility in the Context of International Humanitarian Law

Öz

Depending on common usage of the information and the communication technologies, technology addiction of the states, which improve their technologic infrastructure every passing day, also brines alone another risk field on their part at the same time. Taken advantage of the technology in every area, it is a primary importance for the states to obtain the most contribution in the defense and safety area. Every state is in need of to improve their military infrastructure constantly within the context of armed conflict and deterrence power. The most important thing to emerge in the development process of the technology and science is the need for human existence and contribution are gradually decreasing. We can say that technology gradually replaces humans in the war and also hot conflict. The usage of the autonomous weapon systems in the mentioned areas are increasing day by day in the development process of the technology. Nevertheless, there are regulation gap about the usage of the autonomous weapon systems in the presence of international organizations and states and it is not clear how to be filled. It is being discussed whether to be filled or not for these regulation gaps and what kind of international rules of law should be applied with its responsibilities in this study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Autonomous Weapon Systems, International Humanitarian Law, Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility, International Crimes.

Kaynakça

• AKKUŞ, Berkant: “An Assessment of the Acceptance of Meaningful Human Control as a Norm of International Law in Armed Conicts Using Articial Intelligence”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 2022, Cilt 81, Sayı 3, s. 49-101.
• AKKUŞ, Berkant: “Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukukun İnsandışılaştırılması: Otonom Silah Sistemlerinin Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk Üzerindeki Potansiyel Etkisi Üzerine Bir Analiz”, Güvenlik Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2022, Cilt 24, Sayı 2, s. 174-196.
• AMBOS, Kai: “Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2007, Cilt 5, Sayı 1, s. 159-183.
• AMOROSO, Daniele / GIORDANO, Benedetta: “Who is to Blame for Autonomous Weapons Systems’ Misdoings?”, (Ed.) CARPANELLI, Elena / LAZZERINI, Nicole: Use and Misuse of New Technologies: Contemporary Challenges in International and European Law, Springer, Cham, 2019, s. 211-232.
• ANDERSON, Kenneth / WAXMAN, Matthew C.: “Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems, Their Ethics, and Their Regulation Under International Law”, Washington College of Law Research, 2017, Sayı 21, s. 1097-1117 (Debating Autonomous Weapon Systems).
• ANDERSON, Kenneth / WAXMAN, Matthew C.: “Law And Ethics for Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why a Ban Won’t Work and How the Laws of War Can”, American University Washington College of Law Research Paper, 2013, Sayı 11, s. 1-32.
• ANDERSON, Kenneth: “Targeted Killing and Drone Warfare: How We Came to Debate Whether There is a ‘Legal Geography of War’”, American University Washington College of Law Research Paper, 2011, Sayı 16, s. 1-17.
• ARKIN, Ronal C.: “Governing Lethal Behavior: Embedding Ethics in a Hybrid Deliberative/Reactive Robot Architecture Part I: Motivation and Philosophy”, 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), IEEE, Amsterdam, 2008, s. 121-128 (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6249424, ET: 18.07.2023).
• BACAKSIZ, Pınar / SÜMER, Seda Yağmur: Robotlar, Yapay Zeka ve Ceza Hukuku, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2021.
• BOOGAARD, Jeroen van den: “Proportionality and Autonomous Weapens Systems”, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 2015, Cilt 6, Sayı 2, s. 247-283.
• BOOTHBY, William H.: Conflict Law: The Influence of New Weapons Technology: Human Rights and Emerging Actors, Springer, The Hague, 2014.
• BOUTIN, Berenice: “Legal Questions Related to the Use of Autonomous Weapon Systems”, Asser Institute Center for International and European Law, 2021, s. 1-10.
• BOUTIN, Bérénice: “State Responsibility in Relation to Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2023, Cilt 36, Sayı 1, s. 133-150.
• BREHM, Maya: “Defending the Boundary: Constraints and Requirements on the Use of Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law”, Geneva Academy Briefing, 2017, Sayı 9, s. 3-71.
• CARNAHAN, Burrus M.: “Lincoln, Lieber and the Laws of War: The Origins and Limits of the Principle of Military Necessity”, The American Journal of International Law, 1988, Cilt 92, Sayı 2, s. 213-231.
• COFFIN, Andrew M.: Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: Can Targeting Occur Without Ethical Decision-Making?, United States Naval War College, Newport, 2019.
• COPELAND, Damian / LIIVOJA, Rain / SANDERS, Lauren: “The Utility of Weapons Reviews in Addressing Concerns Raised by Autonomous Weapon Systems”, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, 2023, Cilt 28, Sayı 2, s. 285-316.
• COVERDALE, John F.: “An Introduction to the Just War Tradition”, Pace International Law Review, 2004, Cilt 16, Sayı 2, s. 221-277.
• CRYER, Robert: Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.
• DAVISON, Neil: “A Legal Perspective: Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Humanitarian Law”, Perspectives on Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, UN Publications, New York, 2018, 30, s. 5-18.
• DONLEY, Michael B. / SCHWARTZ, Norton A.: “Unmanned Aircraft Systems Flight Plan 2009-2047”, 2009 (https://nps.edu/documents/106607930/106914584/UAS+Air+Force+Roadmap+2009.pdf/179e02eb-a788-4a85-a791-c13c39640ac9, ET: 15.07.2023)
• DREMLIUGA, Roman: “General Legal Limits of the Application of the Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems within the Purview of International Humanitarian Law”, Journal of Politics and Law, 2020, Cilt 13, Sayı 2, s. 115-121.
• DÜLGER, Kenan: Devletin Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukukun İhlalinden Doğan Sorumluluğu, Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2015 (Devletin Sorumluluğu).
• DÜLGER, Murat Volkan: “Yapay Zekalı Varlıkların Hukuk Dünyasına Yansıması: Bu Varlıkların Hukuki Statüleri Nasıl Belirlenmeli?”, Terazi Hukuk Dergisi, 2018, Cilt 13, Sayı 142, s. 82-87.
• EGELAND, Kjølv: “Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Humanitarian Law”, Nordic Journal of International Law, 2016, Cilt 85, Sayı 2, s. 1-31.
• ERYAVUZ, Feriha Beyza: “Savaş Suçları Bağlamında Otonom Silahlarda Hesap Verilebilirlik Sorunsalı”, Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2023, Cilt 9, Sayı 1, s. 93-107.
• EYKHOLT, Kevin / EVTIMOV, Ivan / FERNANDES, Earlence / LI, Bo / RAHMATİ, Amir / XIAO, Chaowei / PRAKASH, Atul / KOHNO, Tadayoshi / SONG, Dawn: “Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Visual Classification”, Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE/CVF, Salt Lake City, 2018, s. 1625-1634.
• GEISS, Robin: The International-Law Dimension of Autonomous Weapons Systems, Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, Bonn, 2015.
• GHOSHRAY, Saby: “Targeted Killing in International Law: Searching for Rights in The Shadow of 9/11”, Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 2014, Cilt 24, Sayı 2, s. 355-428.
• GÜNEYSU, Gökhan: Otonom Silah Sistemleri – Bir Uluslararası Hukuk İncelemesi, Nisan Yayınları, Eskişehir, 2022.
• HAJDIN, Nikola R.: “The Actus Reus of the Crime of Aggression”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2021, Cilt 34, Sayı 2, s. 489-504.
• HALAJOVÁ, Ludmila: “Individual Criminal Responsibility For War Crimes Resulting From The Use Of Autonomous Weapons Systems”, The Lawyer Quarterly, 2020, Cilt 10, Sayı 2, s. 130-152.
• HILLIER, Tim: Sourcebook on Public International Law, Cavendish, London, 1998.
• HOLSTEIN, Eugene: Autonomous Weapon Systems Under International Criminal Law and the Accountability for Crimes Committed by Them, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Riga Graduate School of Law, 2022.
• HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: “Mind the Gap: The Lack of Accountability for Killer Robots”, 2015 (https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/04/09/mind-gap/lack-accountability-killer-robots, ET: 01.08.2023).
• HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH: Losing Humanity: The Case Against Killer Robots, International Human Rights Clinic, Harvard, 2012 (https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/arms1112_ForUpload.pdf, ET: 11.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF RED CROSS: Autonomous Weapon Systems: Technical, Military, Legal and Humanitarian Aspects, 26-28 March 2014, Geneva, 2014 (https://www.icrc.org/en/document/report-icrc-meeting-autonomous-weapon-systems-26-28-march-2014, ET: 10.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: “Jus ad Bellum ve Jus in Bello”, 2010 (https://www.icrc.org/en/document/jus-ad-bellum-jus-in-bello, ET: 15.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: Autonomous Weapon Systems: Implications of Increasing Autonomy in the Critical Functions of Weapons, 15-16 March 2016, Versoix, 2016 (https://www.icrc.org/fr/publication/4283-autonomous-weapon-systems-implications-increasing-autonomy-critical-functions, ET: 15.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: Basic Rules of International Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts, 1988 (https://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/misc/basic-rules-ihl-311288.htm, ET: 17.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: Fundamentals of International Humanitarian Law, 1988 (https://casebook.icrc.org/law/fundamentals-ihl, ET: 17.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: Military Necessary, 1988 (https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/military-necessity, ET: 18.07.2023).
• INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, 1996 (https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf, ET: 17.07.2023).
• KAHVECİ, Muzaffer / CAN, Nazlı: “İnsansız Hava Araçları: Tarihçesi, Tanımı, Dünyada ve Türkiye’deki Yasal Durumu”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 2017, Cilt 5, Sayı 4, s. 511-535.
• KALLENBORN, Zachary: Are Drone Swarms Weapons of Mass Destruction?, United States Air Force Center for Strategic Deterrence Studies Future Warfare Series, Alabama, 2020.
• KALSHOVEN, Frits: “State Responsibility for Warlike Acts of The Armed Forces: From Article 3 of Hague Convention IV of 1907 to Article 91 of Additional Protocol I of 1977 and Beyond”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1991, Cilt 40, Sayı 4, s. 827-858.
• KELLENBERGER, Jakop: “International Humanitarian Law and New Weapon Technologies, 34th Round Table on Current Issues of International Humanitarian Law San Remo, Italy, 8–10 September 2011”, International Review of the Red Cross, 2012, Cilt 94, Sayı 886, s. 809-817.
• KELLEY, Stephen Andrew: Better Lucky Than Good: Operation Earnest Will As Gunboat Diplomacy, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, 2007.
• KRESS, Claus / VON HOLTZENDORFF, Leonie: “Saldırganlık Suçunda Kampala Uzlaşması”, (Çev.) ERDÖZEN, Ozan, Küresel Bakış, 2011, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, s. 13-65.
• LAGIOIA, Francesca / SARTOR, Giovanni: “AI Systems Under Criminal Law: a Legal Analysis and a Regulatory Perspective”, Philosophy & Technology, 2020, Cilt 33, s. 433-465.
• MANN, Jindan-Karena: “Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Liability Gap, Part One: Introduction to Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Criminal Liability”, Rethinking SLIC, 2019 (https://www.rethinkingslic.org/blog/criminal-law/51-autonomous-weapons-systems-and-the-liability-gap-part-one-introduction-to-autonomous-weapon-systems-and-international-criminal-liability, ET: 22.07.2023).
• MATTHIAS, Andreas: “The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata”, Ethics and Information Technology, 2004, Cilt 6, s. 175-183.
• MAY, Larry: Aggression and Crimes Against Peace, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008.
• McFARLAND, Tim / McCORMACK, Tim: “Mind the Gap: Can Developers of Autonomous Weapons Systems be Liable for War Crimes?”, International Law Studies, 2014, Cilt 90, Sayı 1, s. 361-385.
• MILLER, Seumas: Shooting to Kill: The Ethics of Police and Military Use of Lethal Force, Oxford University Press, New York, 2016.
• MULLER, Vincent C. / SIMPSON, Thomas W.: “Killer Robots: Regulate, Don’t Ban”, BSG Policy Memo, 2014 (https://philarchive.org/archive/MLLKRR, ET: 30.07.2023).
• NYHOLM, Sven: “Attributing Agency to Automated Systems: Reflections on Human–Robot Collaborations and Responsibility-Loci”, Science and Engineering Ethics, 2018, Cilt 24, s. 1201-1219.
• OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF: DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, The Joint Staff, Washington DC, 2021 (https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/dictionary.pdf , ET: 16.07.2023).
• OIMANN, Ann Katrien: “The Responsibility Gap and Laws: a Critical Mapping of the Debate”, Philosophy & Technology, 2023, Cilt 36, Sayı 3, s. 1-22.
• ÖNOK, R. Murat: “Silahlı Çatışmalar Hukukunda Üstün Sorumluluğu Doktrini”, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 2005, Cilt 1, Sayı 3, s. 93-126.
• ÖZER, Adem: Silahlandırılmış Yapay Zeka Otonom Silah Sistemleri ve Uluslararası Hukuk, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara, 2022.
• QUINCE, Sophie: The Laws Surrounding Responsibility and Accountability of Autonomous Weapons Systems are Insufficient: An Analysis of Legal and Ethical Implications of Autonomous Weapons Systems, Northumbria Universty Law School, 2020 (https://www.northumbriajournals.co.uk/index.php/sjppar/article/view/1113/1471, ET: 26.07.2023).
• RAU, Markus: “State Liability For Violations of International Humanitarian Law-The Distomo Case Before the German Federal Constitutional Court”, German Law Journal, 2005, Cilt 7, Sayı 7, s. 701-720.
• REDDY, R. Shashank: “India and The Challenge of Autonomous Weapons”, Carnegie India, 2016 (https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CEIP_CP275_Reddy_final.pdf, ET: 16.07.2023).
• RUYS, Tom: Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
• SASSOLI, Marco: “Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to be Clarified”, International Law Studies, 2014, Cilt 90, s. 308-340.
• SASSOLI, Marco: “State Responsibility for Violations of International Humanitarian Law”, International Review of the Red Cross, 2002, Cilt 84, Sayı 846, s. 401-434.
• SCHARRE, Paul: “Autonomous Weapons and Operational Risk, Ethical Autonomy Project”, Center for a New American Security, 2016 (https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/hero/documents/CNAS_Autonomous-weapons-operational-risk.pdf?mtime=20160906080515&focal=none, ET: 19.07.2023).
• SCHARRE, Paul: İnsansız Ordular Katil Robotlar, Otonom Silahlar ve Makine Savaşları, (Çev.) ÇETİNALP, Kutsi Aybars, Kronik Yayınları, İstanbul, 2020 (İnsansız Ordular).
• SCHMITT, Michael N. / THURNHER, Jeffrey S.: “Out of the Loop: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict”, Harvard National Security Journal, 2013, Cilt 4, Sayı 2, s. 231-281.
• SCHMITT, Michael N.: “The Principle of Discrimination in 21st Century Warfare”, Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 1999, Cilt 2, Sayı 1, s. 143-182.
• SHARKEY, Noel: “The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics”, Science New Series, 2008, Cilt 322, Sayı 5909, s. 1800-1801.
• SHAW, Malcolm N.: International Law, 6. Baskı, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
• SIMMLER, Monika / MARKWALDER, Nora: “Guilty Robots? – Rethinking the Nature of Culpability and Legal Personhood in an Age of Artificial Intelligence”, Criminal Law Forum, 2019, 30, s. 1-31.
• SPARROW, Robert: “Killer Robots”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2007, Cilt 24, Sayı 1, s. 62-77.
• STANTON, Gregory H.: “The Logic of the Ten Stages of Genocide”, Genocide Watch, 2023 (https://www.genocidewatch.com/tenstages, ET: 20.07.2023).
• TEKELİ, Melisa: Askeri Sahada Yapay Zeka Kullanımının Gelişimi: Etik ve Hukuki Sorunlar, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2021.
• THE WHITE HOUSE: International Strategy For Cyberspace, 2011 (https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/international_strategy_for_cyberspace.pdf, ET: 19.07.2023).
• UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS: Draft Report of the 2021 Session of the Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, 2021 (https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/ccw/2021/gge/documents/draft-report.pdf, ET: 20.07.2023).
• UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR DISARMAMENT AFFAIRS: Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Certain Conventional Weapons Which May Be Deemed to be Excessively Injurious or to Have Indiscriminate Effects, CCW/MSP/2022/7, 16-18 November 2022, Geneva, 2022 (https://unoda-documents-library.s3.amazonaws.com/Convention_on_Certain_Conventional_Weapons_-_Meeting_of_High_Contracting_Parties_(2022)/CCW-MSP-2022-7-Advance_version.pdf, ET: 03.08.2023).
• WAGNER, Markus: “Taking Humans Out of the Loop: Implications for International Humanitarian Law”, Journal of Law Information and Science, 2011, Cilt 21, s. 1-10.
• WALLACH, Wendell / COLIN, Allen: Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009.
• WOOD, Nathan Gabriel: “Autonomous Weapon Systems and Responsibility Gaps: A Taxonomy”, Ethics and Information Technology, 2023, Cilt 25, Sayı 16, s. 1-14.
• WU, Xingjiao / XIAO, Luwei / SUN, Yixuan / ZHANG, Junhang / MA, Tianlong / HE, Liang: “A Survey of Human-in-the-Loop for Machine Learning”, Future Generation Computer Systems, 2022, Cilt 135, s. 364-381.
• YAMANER, Melike Batur / ÖKTEM, A. Emre / KURTDARCAN, Bleda / UZUN, Mehmet C.: 12 Ağustos 1949 Tarihli Cenevre Sözleşmeleri ve Ek Protokolleri, Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2009.
• YAZICILAR, Tarık T.: Otonom Araçların Kullanımından Doğan Cezai Sorumluluk, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2022.