Uluslararası Hukukta Disiplinler Arası İşbirliğine Önemli Bir Örnek: İran-ABD İddiaları Hakem Mahkemesi

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 35 - 61, 31.10.2016

Beyza Özturanlı

Öz

Kasım 1979’da İran ve ABD arasındaki, Tahran’da bulunan ABD büyükelçiliği baskını ve elçilik personelinin rehin alınması olayları ile başlayan, ardından ABD tarafından İran vatandaşlarına ait malvarlıklarına el konulması ve ticari ilişkilerin durdurulmasına yönelik bir dizi yaptırımın devreye girmesiyle şiddetlenen uyuşmazlık, Cezayir’in arabuluculuğunda kabul edilen Bildiriler ile Ocak 1981’de çözüm aşamasına taşınmıştır.
İki egemen devlet arasında, önemli ulusal menfaatleri ihtiva eden çok boyutlu bir uyuşmazlığın, uluslararası kamu hukuku enstrümanlarıyla kurulan bir uluslararası mahkeme tarafından, uluslararası özel hukuk kişilerine ve özel hukuka ilişkin iddiaları da içerecek şekilde çözüme kavuşturulması, uyuşmazlıkların barışçıl çözümü bakımından olumlu bir adım olduğu kadar, kamu hukukunun ve özel hukukun tahkim alanındaki işbirliğini göstermektedir.
Uluslararası tahkim, özellikle 20. yüzyılın sonlarına doğru uluslararası ticaret hukuku uygulamasının hakimiyeti altına girmiş ve literatürde uluslararası kamu hukuku tahkimine neredeyse rastlanamaz hale gelmiştir. Oysa her iki disiplinin kendi sınırları içerisindeki tahkim uygulaması arasında ne gibi bir ayrım olduğu hususu da ortaya konulmamıştır. Bu anlamda İran-ABD İddiaları Hakem Mahkemesi, kuruluşu, yargılama usulü ve kararlarının bakımından, uluslararası tahkimin, günümüz uluslararası kamu hukuku ve uluslararası özel hukuktaki görünümünü ve işbirliğini gösteren önemli bir örnektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Hukuk, İran, ABD, İran-ABD İddiaları Hakem Mahkemesi

This Multidimensional Dispute Between Two Sovereign States Containing The High National İnterests

Öz

The dispute between Iran and USA which started in November 1979 with the irruption and hostage taking in USA Embassy of Tehran and became intensified with sanctions including the asset freezing and cassation of business by USA against to Iran, has been get to the phase of solution by the Declarations admitted between two countries under the conciliation of Algeria in January 1984.
This multidimensional dispute between two sovereign States containing the high national interests of them has been resolved by an arbitral tribunal established by the instruments of public international law. Filing claims arising out of the public and private international law before the same tribunal is an important step in respect of peaceful settlement of international dispute and indicates the cooperation of public and private international law as well.
International arbitration have fall under the hegemony of private international law lately in the 20th century. It has been a slight chance to some across the public international law arbitration. However the difference between public and private international arbitration has not been established clearly. In this context, Iran-USA Arbitral Tribunal is a significant model in the terms of its organization, adjudication and the cooperation of the public and private international law.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Multidimensional Dispute, States Containing, The High National İnterests

Kaynakça

• ABI-SAAB, Georges, “Fragmentation or Unification: Some Concluding Remarks”, New York University Journal of International Law & Policy, Vol. 31, 1999, s. 919- 922.
• AKINCI, Ziya, Milletlerarası Tahkim, Ankara, 2007.
• ALDRICH, George H., The Jurisprudence of the Iran United States Claims Tribunal, Oxford, 1996.
• ATAMAN FİGANMEŞE, İnci, “Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkim İle Yatırım Tahkimi Arasındaki Farklar”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, Cilt 31, Sayı 1 (2011), s. 91-152.
• BOZKURT, Enver / KÜTÜKÇÜ, M. Akif / POYRAZ, Yasin, Devletler Hukuku, 4. Baskı, Ankara, 2004.
• BLEICH, Jeffrey, “A New Direction for the PCA: The Work of the Expert Group”, Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 6, 1993, s. 215-240.
• BROWER, Charles H. II, “The Functions and Limits of Arbitration and Judicial Settlement under Private and Public International Law”, Duke Journal of Comperative & International Law, Vol. 18, 2008, Issue 2, s. 259-309.
• BROWER II, Charles H., “Definition, Nature and Historical Development of Arbitration”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Heidelberg, 2012, s. 1-15
• BROWN, Chester, “The Inherent Powers of International Courts and Tribunals”, British Yearbook of International Law, Volume 76, issue 1, s. 195-244.
• BROWNLIE, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, Oxford, 2003.
• CANER, Oğuz, “INCOTERMS 2010 (ICC Rules of the Use of Domestic and International Trade Terms)”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Yıl:11 Sayı: 22 Güz 2012/2, s. 223- 262.
• CARLSTON, Kenneth S., The Process of International Arbitration, New York, 1946.
• CARLSTON, Kenneth S. “Importance of Procedural Rules in International Arbitration”, International Arbitral Journal, Vol. 1, 1945, Chapter 7.
• CARON, David, “Towards A Political Theory of International Courts and Tribunals”, Berkeley Law Scholarship Repositary, 2006, Vol. 24, s. 401-422
• CARON, David, “The Nature of Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Evolving Structure of International Dispute Resolution”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 84, 1990, s. 104-156.
• CARTER, James, “Iran-United States Tribunal Observation on First Year”, Ucla Law Review, Vol. 29, 1981-1982, s. 1076-1080.
• CLARKE, R. Floyd, “A Permanent Tribunal of International Arbitration: Its Necessity and Value”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 1, 1907, s. 302-408.
• Conference on Trade and Development, “Dispute Settlement”, New York - Geneva, 2003, s. 10, http://unctad.org/fr/Docs/edmmisc232add26_en.pdf (son erişim: 08.09.2013).
• COOK, Adrian, The Alabama Claims: American Politics and Anglo-American Relations, 1865–1872, New York, 1975.
• CRAWFORD, James, Principles of Public International Law, 8th edition, Oxford, 2008.
• “Decisions of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal”, in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), Vol. 78 (April 12-14, 1984).
• Declaration of the Government of the Democratic and Popular Republic of Algeria Relating to Commitments made by Iran and United States of America, 19 January 1981, tam metin için bkz. http://www.iusct.net/General%20Documents/1-General%20Declaration%E2%80%8E.pdf (son erişim: 12.05.2016)
• Declaration of The Government of The Democratic and Popular Republic of Algeria Concerning The Settlement of Claims by The Government of The United States of America and The Government of The Islamic Republic of Iran (Claims Settlement Declaration), 19 January 1981, https://www.iusct.net/Pages/Public/A-Documents.aspx, (son erişim: 12.05.2016)
• DELAUME, Georges, “ICSID Arbitration and the Courts”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 77,, No: 4, 1983, s. 784-803
• Definition of key terms used in the UN Treaty Collection, United Nations Treaty Collection, https://treaties.un.org/Pages/overview.aspx?path=overview/definition/page1_en.xml#declarations (son erişim: 12.05.2016).
• DOĞAN, İlyas, Devletler Hukuku, Ankara, 2008.
• ERDOĞAN, Feyiz, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Tahkim, Ankara, 2004.
• FRANCK, Thomas M., Judging the World Court, New York, 1986.
• FREEMAN, Alwyn Vernon, The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice, Longmans, Green and Company, London, 1938.
• GARRO, Alejandro Miguel, “Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Jurisdiction of Arbitral Tribunals in Latin America”, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol I, 1989, s. 293-321.
• GRAY, Christine / KINGSBURY, Benedict, “Developments in Dispute Settlement: Inter-State Arbitration Since 1945”, British Yearbook of International Law (1992) 63 (1), s. 97-134.
• GRAY, Christine, Judicial Remedies in International Law, Oxford, 1990.
• GÜNDÜZ, Aslan, Milletlerarası Hukuk, Reşat Volkan GÜNEL (Ed.), 6. Baskı, İstanbul, 2013.
• HERTZ, Michael F., “The Hostage Crisis and Domestic Litigation: An Overview, Lillich”, in The Iran United States Claims Tribunal, Edited by Richard B. LILLICH, 1981-1983, Virginia, 1985, s. 136.
• HIRSCH, Alain, “The Place of Abritration and the Lex Arbitri”, Arbitration Journal, Sep79, Vol. 34 Issue 3, s. 43.
• Issues of State Responsibility Before International Judicial Institutions, Edited by Malgosia Fitzmaurice, Danesh Sarooshi, The Clifford Chance Lectures, Vol. VII, Oxford, 2004.
• JANIS, Mark W., “The International Court” in International Courts for the Twenty-first Century, Mark W. Janis Edition, Dordrecht, 1992.
• KALPSÜZ, Turgut, “Türk Hakem Kararı Kavramı”, in Yabancı Hakem Kararlarının Türkiye’de Tanınması ve Tenfizi Bildiriler Tartışmalar, II. Tahkim Haftası, Ankara, 1984.
• KARAYALÇIN, Yaşar, “Milletlerarası Tahkimde Muhakeme Usulü”, BATIDER, 1998, C.XIX, S.3.
• KAZUTAKE, Okuma, “Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration: Consolidation of Multiparty and Classwide Arbitration”, Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, Volume 9, Issue 1, s. 189-226.
• KENNEDY, Paul, “In the Shadow of the Great War”, New York Review of Books, August 12, 1999, s. 36. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1999/aug/12/in-the-shadow-of-the-great-war/, (son erişim: 12.12.2013).
• LAKE, William T. / DANA, Jane Tucker, “Judicial Review of Awards of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Are the Tribunal Awards Dutch?” Law & Policy International Business, 1984, Vol. 16, s. 755.
• LAUTERPACHT, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community, Oxford, 1933.
• LEGUM, Barton, “Investment Treaty Arbitration’s Contribution to International Commercial Arbitration”, Dispute Resolution Journal, August-October, 2005, s. 70.
• LOWENFELD, Andreas F., International Litigation and Arbitration, St. Paul, 1993.
• MANN, Francis A., “Lex Facit Arbitrium”, Arbitration International, Vol. 2 (3), 1986, s. 157.
• MENGİLER, Özgür, Birleşmiş Milletler Çerçevesinde Uyuşmazlıkların Barışçıl Çözümü, Ankara, 2005
• MERRILLS, J.G., International Dispute Settlement, 4th Edition, Cambridge, 2005.
• MERRILLS, J.G, “The Contribution of the Permanent Court of Arbitration to International Law and to the Settlement of Disputes by Peaceful Means” in The Permanent Court of Arbitration: International Arbitration and Dispute Resolution, Summaries of Awards, Settlement Agreements and Reports, Hague, 1999, s. 3-27.
• MOHEBI, Mohsen, The International Law Character of the Iran- United States Claims Tribunal, Hague-London-Boston, 1999.
• NOMER, Ergin, Devletler Hususi Hukuku, 20. Bası, İstanbul.
• OELLERS-FRAHM, Karin, “Judicial and Arbitral Decisions, Validity and Nullity”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 2011.
• OLSON, William C., The Theory and Practice of International Relations, 7th Edition, 1987. ÖZTURANLI, Beyza, Devletlerarası Tahkim, Ankara, 2016.
• PAZARCI, Hüseyin, Uluslararası Hukuk, 12. Baskı, Ankara, 2013
• PINTO, M.C.W., “The Prospects for International Arbitration: Inter-State Disputes”, in International Arbitration: Past and Prospects, A.H.A. Soons Edition, 1990, s. 63-66.
• RALSTON, Jackson H., International Arbitration from Athens to Locarno, California, 1929.
• RALSTON, Jackson H., The Law and Procedure of International Tribunals, Reviwed Edition 1926, Garland, 1926.
• Redfern & Hunter on International Arbitration, edited by Nigel BLACKAB/ Constantine PARTASIDES/Alan REDFERN/ Martin HUNTER. 5th edition, Oxford, 2009.
• REISMAN, William Michael, Nullity and Revision: The Review and Enforcement of International Judgements and Award, Yale University Press, 1971.
• Rosenne’s the World Court: What It is and How It Works, 6th Edition- Terry D. Gill Edition, Netherlands, 2003.
• SCHILL, Stephan, “Public or Private Dispute Settlement? The Culture Clash in Investment Treaty Arbitration and its Impact on the Role of the Arbitrator”, New Directions in International Economic Law, In Memoriam Thomas Wälde, Leiden-Boston, 2011, s. 23.
• SCHWARZENBERGER, Georg, “Present-day Relevance of the Jay Treaty Arbitrations”, Notre Dame Law Review, 1978, Vol. 53, s. 715-733.
• SCHACHTER, Oscar, “The Enforcement of International Judicial and Arbitral Awards”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 54, No. 1, January 1960, s. 1.
• SCHWEBEL, Stephen W., “The Reality of International Adjudication and Arbitration”, Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution, 2004, Vol. 12 s. 359-363.
• SHAW, Malcolm N., International Law, 5th Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
• SIMPSON, J.L. / FOX, Hazel, International Arbitration, New York, 1959.
• SOHN, L. B., “International Arbitration in Historical Perspective: Past and Present”, in International Arbitration: Past and Prospects, 1990, s. 9-22
• SOHN, L. B., “Settlement of Disputes Relating to the Interpretation and Application of Treaties”, Hague Recueil, Vol. 150, 1976-II, s. 266-70.
• SOHN, Louis, “The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Jurisprudential Contribution to the Development of International Law”, in The Iran United States Claims Tribunal, Edited by Richard B. LILLICH, 1981-1983, Virginia, 1985, s. 92.
• SÖYLER, Yasin, “Barcelona Traction Davası ve Uluslararası Hukuka Etkisi”, Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt XIX, Yıl 2015, Sayı 3, s. 207-259.
• STRUPP, Karl, “The Commpetence of the Mixed Arbitral Courts of the Treaty of Versailles”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, 1923, s. 661-690.
• ŞANLI, Cemal, Uluslararası Ticari Akitlerin Hazırlanması ve Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005.
• The Permanent Court of Arbitration, Working Group on Improving the Function of the Court – New Directions, International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, Hague, 1991.
• ULUSOY HALATÇI, Ülkü, Dünya Ticaret Örgütü’nde Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Mekanizması, Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara, 2009.
• United Nations, A Survey of Treaty Provisions for the Pacific Settlements of International Disputes, 1949-62, UN Publication, 1966.
• United Nations, Draft articles on Diplomatic Protection, 2006, http://www.refworld.org/docid/525417fc4.html (son erişim: 14.05.2016).
• VATTEL, E., The Law of Nations (Principles of the Natural Law, Classics of International Law), Book II, 1916.
• WETTER, J. Gillis, International Arbitral Process: Public and Private, New York, 1979.
• YEŞİLOVA, Bilgehan, “Milletlerarası Tahkimin Hukuki Niteliği Üzerine Düşünceler ve Güncel Gelişmeler”, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Sayı 76, 2008, s. 83-164.