Liberal Söylemi Dönüştürmek İçin Konfederalist Bir Talep: Uluslararası Azınlık Koruma Rejimlerinin Kapsamlı Bir Analizi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 3 - 41, 30.01.2021

Hakan Kolçak

Öz

Bu çalışma, uluslararası azınlık koruma rejimlerinin gelişimini ve mevcut sorunlarını analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Disiplinlerarası bir makale olan çalışmamız, hem uluslararası insan hakları hukuku hem de anayasal siyaset biliminin araştırma yöntemlerinden faydalanmaktadır. Küresel gelişmeler, 1800’lü yıllardan beri azınlık haklarının kapsamını ciddi bir şekilde etkilemiştir. Dini ve milli değerler, Milletler Cemiyeti (MC) kurulmadan önce varlığını sürdüren yerel azınlık koruma
sistemlerinin temellerini oluşturmuştur. MC, azınlık haklarının korunması üzerine ilk uluslararası mekanizmayı inşa etmiştir. Birleşmiş Milletler’in kurulması ile birlikte şekillendirilen liberal ferdiyetçi azınlık koruma sistemi, MC’nin toplulukçu mekanizmasını ortadan kaldırmıştır. Pek çok devlet, liberal azınlık hakları söylevini 1950’li yıllardan itibaren ulusal mevzuatlarına dahil etmiştir. Bu çalışmaya göre; liberal söylev, yakın gelecekte kapsamını genişletmek zorunda kalabilir. Katalanlar ve İskoçlar gibi bazı ulusal azınlıklar, Avrupa Birliği (AB) ve benzeri ulus-üstü konfederalist kurumların mevcudiyetinde ulusal sınırların varlığını reddetmektedir. Mevzu bahis azınlıklar, bulundukları ülkelerde özerklik haklarını kullanmaktan ziyade mevcut özerk bölgelerini AB benzeri konfederalist yapılara bağlı egemen devletlere dönüştürmeyi arzulamaktadır. Çalışmamız, söz konusu dönüşüm süreci ile ilgili bir çözüm bulunması hususunu, liberal azınlık
hakları söylevinin yakın gelecekte irdelemesi gereken bir mesele olarak görmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Azınlık Hakları, Ferdiyetçi Özgürlükler, Konfederalizm, Liberalizm, Toplulukçu Haklar

A Confederalist Demand to Transform the Liberal Discourse: A Comprehensive Analysis of International Minority Protection Regimes

Öz

This study seeks to analyze the advancement and present matters of international minority protection regimes. It is an interdisciplinary article that draws on the methods of international human rights law and constitutional politics. Global developments have dramatically affected the scope of minority rights since the 1800s. Religious and national characteristics were the basis of domestic minority protection regimes until the foundation of the League of Nations (LoN). The LoN established the first international protection mechanism for minority rights. This communitarian mechanism was replaced with its liberal individualist counterpart with the establishment of the United Nations. Many states have incorporated the liberal discourse of minority rights into their constitutional, statutory and regulatory documents since the 1950s. According to this study, the liberal discourse would need to enlarge its scope in the near future. Some national minorities, including the Catalans and Scots, reject the existence of national borders in the presence of supranational confederalist institutions, e.g. the European Union (EU). They do not want to exercise self-government rights within their home states. Instead, they would like to transform their autonomous regions into the sovereign states of EU-like confederalist organizations. This study maintains that finding a resolution for this transformation process would be one of the main research questions that the liberal discourse should answer in the near future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Minority Rights, Individualist Freedoms, Confederalism, Liberalism, Collectivist Rights

Kaynakça

• ACFC: Commentary on Education under the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, Council of Europe Publication Office, Strasbourg, 2006.
• ACFC: Commentary on the Effective Participation of Persons Belonging to National Minorities in Cultural, Social and Economic Life and in Public Affairs, Council of Europe Publication Office, Strasbourg, 2008.
• ACFC: Thematic Commentary No. 3: The Language Rights of Persons Belonging to National Minorities under the Framework Convention, Council of Europe Publication Office, Strasbourg, 2012.
• ACFC: Thematic Commentary No. 4 on the Framework Convention: A Key Tool to Managing Diversity through Minority Rights, Council of Europe Publication Office, Strasbourg, 2016.
• ADAM, Elisanda: “Self-Determination and the Use of Referendums: The Case of Scotland”, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 2014, Volume 27, No 1, pp. 47-66.
• AKERMARK, Sia: “Internal Self-Determination and the Role of Territorial Autonomy as a Tool for the Resolution of Ethno-Political Disputes”, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 2013, Volume 20, No 1, pp. 5-25.
• ANDREU, Josep: “Constitution and Referendum on Secession in Catalonia”, (Eds.) LOPEZ-BASAGUREN, Alberto / SAN-EPIFANIO, L. Escajedo: Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain, Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 405-422.
• ANTUNES, Sandrina / LOUGHLIN, John: “The European Union, Subnational Mobilization and State Rescaling in Small Unitary States: A Comparative Analysis”, Regional & Federal Studies, 2020, Volume 30, No 2, pp. 121-136.
• ARAL, Berdal: “The Idea of Human Rights as Perceived in the Ottoman Empire”, Human Rights Quarterly, 2004, Volume 26, No 2, pp. 454-482.
• ASHCROFT, Richard / BEVIR, Mark: “Pluralism, National Identity and Citizenship: Britain after Brexit”, The Political Quarterly, 2016, Volume 87, No 3, pp. 355-359.
• BERRY, Stephanie: “The Siren’s Call? Exploring the Implications of an Additional Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights on National Minorities”, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 2016, Volume 23, No 1, pp. 1-38.
• BOULDEN, Jane / KYMLICKA, Will: “Introduction”, (Eds.) BOULDEN, Jane / KYMLICKA, Will: International Approaches to Governing Ethnic Diversity, Oxford University Press, New York, 2015, pp. 1-21.
• BOYLAN, Brandon / TURKINA, Ekaterina: “Calling on Europe? Secessionist Political Parties and Their Communications to the European Union”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2019, Volume 57, No 6, pp. 1310-1332.
• BROOKS, Libby: “Sturgeon Demands Independence Referendum Powers be Devolved”, The Guardian, 19 December 2019, accessed at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/19/nicola-sturgeon-requests-independence-referendum-powers, accessed on: 25.08.2020.
• BULLOCK, Steve: “What Representation Would an Independent Scotland Have in the EU?”, (Ed.) HUGHES, Kirsty: An Independent Scotland in the EU: Issues for Accession, Scottish Centre on European Relations Publication Office, Edinburgh, 2020, pp. 20-22.
• CAPOTORTI, Francesco: Study on the Rights of Persons Belonging to Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities, Official Publications of the United Nations, New York, 1979.
• CARRELL, Severin: “Scottish Parliament Votes for Second Independence Referendum”, The Guardian, 28 March 2017, accessed at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/mar/28/scottish-parliament-votes-for-second-independence-referendum-nicola-sturgeon, accessed on: 25.08.2020.
• CASTILLO, Antonio: “State Integration and Disintegration within the European Union: Regarding the Purported Secession of Catalonia and its Hypothetical Membership of the EU”, (Eds.) LOPEZ-BASAGUREN, Alberto / SAN-EPIFANIO, L. Escajedo: Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain, Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 563-574.
• CHILLAUD, Matthieu: “The French Perspective on the Åland Islands: A Cyclic Interest? Between Geopolitics, Historiography, and a Case Study”, Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies, 2018, Volume 2, No 2, pp. 54-69.
• CONNOLLY, Christopher: “Independence in Europe: Secession, Sovereignty, and the European Union”, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 2013, Volume 24, No 1, pp. 51-105.
• CORRAL, Benito / FREIJEDO, Francisco: “Constitutionalizing Secession in Order to Harmonize Constitutionality and Democracy in Territorial Decentralized States Like Spain”, (Eds.) LOPEZ-BASAGUREN, Alberto / SAN-EPIFANIO, L. Escajedo: Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain, Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 265-285.
• CROWCROFT, Orlando: “Scottish Independence Referendum: Sturgeon Says ‘Democracy will Prevail’ after New Vote Refused”, Euronews, 14 January 2020, accessed at: https://www.euro-news.com/2020/01/14/democracy-will-prevail-says-sturgeon-after-johnson-refuses-second-scottish-referendum, accessed on: 28.08.2020.
• CSCE: Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe Final Act, CSCE Publication Office, Helsinki, 1975.
• CSCE: Charter of Paris for a New Europe, CSCE Publication Office, Paris, 1990.
• CSCE: Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE, CSCE Publication Office, Copenhagen, 1990.
• CSCE: Document of the Moscow Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE, CSCE Publication Office, Moscow, 1991.
• CSCE: Report of the CSCE Meeting of Experts on National Minorities, CSCE Publication Office, Geneva, 1991.
• CSCE: The Challenges of Change, CSCE Publication Office, Helsinki, 1992.
• CSCE: Towards a Genuine Partnership in a New Era, CSCE Publication Office, Budapest, 1994.
• DARDANELLI, Paolo / MITCHELL, James: “An Independent Scotland? The Scottish National Party’s Bid for Independence and its Prospects”, The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, 2014, Volume 49, No 3, pp. 88-105.
• DAVIDSON, Jenni: “Independence Referendum must be ‘Legal and Legitimate’, Nicola Sturgeon Emphasises in Brexit Day Speech”, Holyrood, 31 January 2020, accessed at: https://www.holyrood.com/news/view,independence-referendum-must-be-legal-and-legitimate-nicola-sturgeon-emphas_15048.htm, accessed on: 20.08.2020.
• DICKIE, Mure: “SNP ‘Resets’ Plans for Second Scottish Independence Referendum”, Financial Times, 27 June 2017, accessed at: https://www.ft.com/content/84e08f70-b852-3f95-9619-279fc5b93-683, accessed on: 24.08.2020.
• DODDS, Anneliese: “Why People Voted to Leave and What to Do Now: A View from the Doorstep”, The Political Quarterly, 2016, Volume 87, No 3, pp. 360-364.
• DUCHACEK, Ivo: “Consociations of Fatherlands: The Revival of Confederal Principles and Practices”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1982, Volume 12, No 4, pp. 129-177.
• ELAZAR, Daniel: “Confederation and Federal Liberty”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1982, Volume 12, No 4, pp. 1-14.
• ELAZAR, Daniel: Exploring Federalism, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 1987.
• ELAZAR, Daniel: Federalism: An Overview, Human Sciences Research Council Publishers, Pretoria, 1995.
• ELAZAR, Daniel: “From Statism to Federalism: A Paradigm Shift”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1995, Volume 25, No 2, pp. 5-18.
• ELAZAR, Daniel: “Introduction: Using Federalism Today”, International Political Science Review, 1996, Volume 17, No 4, pp. 349-351.
• ENE, Angela-Mihaela: “The Integrative Process of the European Union from the Perspective of Intra-Community Secessionist Movements”, European Integration Realities and Perspectives, 2019, Volume 14, No 1, pp. 313-318.
• GARET, Ronald: “Communality and Existence: The Rights of Groups”, Southern California Law Review, 1983, Volume 56, No 5, pp. 1001-1075.
• GOLDMAN, Olivia: “The Need for an Independent International Mechanism to Protect Group Rights: A Case Study of the Kurds”, Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 1994, Volume 2, No 1, pp. 45-89.
• GOODWIN, Matthew / HEATH, Oliver: “The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the Result”, The Political Quarterly, 2016, Volume 87, No 3, pp. 323-332.
• GRAY, Caroline: Territorial Politics and the Party System in Spain: Continuity and Change since the Financial Crisis, Routledge, London, 2020.
• HARTNEY, Michael: “Some Confusion Concerning Collective Rights”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1991, Volume 24, No 2, pp. 293-314.
• HCNM: The Hague Recommendations Regarding the Education Rights of National Minorities & Explanatory Note, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 1996.
• HCNM: The Oslo Recommendations Regarding the Linguistic Rights of National Minorities & Explanatory Note, HCNM Publication Office, Oslo, 1998.
• HCNM: The Lund Recommendations on the Effective Participation of National Minorities in Public Life & Explanatory Note, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 1999.
• HCNM: OSCE Guidelines on the Use of Minority Languages in the Broadcast Media, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 2003.
• HCNM: OSCE Recommendations on Policing in Multi-Ethnic Societies, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 2006.
• HCNM: The Bolzano/Bozen Recommendations on National Minorities in Inter-State Relations & Explanatory Note, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 2008.
• HCNM: The Ljubljana Guidelines on Integration of Diverse Societies, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 2012.
• HCNM: The Graz Recommendations on Access to Justice and National Minorities & Explanatory Note, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 2017.
• HCNM: The Tallinn Guidelines on National Minorities and the Media in the Digital Age & Explanatory Note, HCNM Publication Office, The Hague, 2019.
• HOBOLT, Sara: “The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent”, Journal of European Public Policy, 2016, Volume 23, No 9, pp. 1259-1277.
• JEFFERSON, Rodney / MORALES, Alex: “Scotland’s Leader Warns Johnson He ‘can’t Deny Democracy’”, Bloomberg, 10 February 2020, accessed at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-10/scotlands-leader-warns-boris-johnson-he-can-t-deny-democracy, accessed on 23.08.2020.
• JOHNSTON, Darlene: “Native Rights as Collective Rights: A Question of Group Self-Preservation”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1989, Volume 2, No 1, pp. 19-34.
• KEATING, Michael: “The Scottish Independence Referendum and After”, Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, 2015, Volume 21, No 1, pp. 73-98.
• KEATING, Michael: “Is a Theory of Self-Determination Possible?”, Ethnopolitics, 2019, Volume 18, No 3, pp. 315-323.
• KOEV, Dan: “Why Ethnic Parties? A New Theory of Ethnic Minority Political Strategy in Europe”, Nations and Nationalism, 2019, Volume 25, No 1, pp. 229-297.
• KOLÇAK, Hakan: “Associate Statehood for Scotland as the Way to Stay in both the United Kingdom and the European Union: The Liechtenstein Example”, Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 2017, Volume 17, No 1, pp. 40-58.
• KOLÇAK, Hakan: “From Unionism to Secessionism: A Comprehensive Analysis of Contemporary Catalan Politics”, Journal of Society and Politics, 2017, Volume 12, No 1, pp. 25-52.
• KOLÇAK, Hakan: “Ongoing Unionism: A Comprehensive Analysis of Galicia via Constitutional and Legal Perspectives”, (Ed.) KAYA, Özlem: Selected Studies on Social Science, Iksad Publications, Ankara, 2020, pp. 3-42.
• KOLÇAK, Hakan: “Unionist Wales: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Welsh Devolved Region via Constitutional and Legal Perspectives”, (Ed.) YILMAZ, Sefer: Public Administrative Studies, Akademisyen Publishing House, Ankara, 2020, pp. 1-21.
• KRAUS, Peter: “Democracy’s Challenge: Nordic Minority Politics in the European Context”, (Eds.) KRAUS, Peter / KIVISTO, Peter: The Challenge of Minority Integration: Politics and Policies in the Nordic Nations, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2015, pp. 38-51.
• KUKATHAS, Chandran: “Are There any Cultural Rights”, Political Theory, 1992, Volume 20, No 1, pp. 105-139.
• KUKATHAS, Chandran: “Liberalism and Multiculturalism: The Politics of Indifference”, Political Theory, 1998, Volume 26, No 5, pp. 686-699.
• KUNZ, Josef: “The Present Status of the International Law for the Protection of Minorities”, American Journal of International Law, 1954, Volume 48, No 2, pp. 282-287.
• KURBAN, Dilek: “Confronting Equality: The Need for Constitutional Protection of Minorities on Turkey’s Path to the European Union”, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 2003, Volume 35, No 1, pp. 151-214.
• KYMLICKA, Will: Liberalism, Community, and Culture, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989.
• KYMLICKA, Will: Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990.
• KYMLICKA, Will: Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
• KYMLICKA, Will: Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.
• KYMLICKA, Will: “Multiculturalism and Minority Rights: West and East”, Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 2002, Volume 4, No 4, pp. 1-27.
• KYMLICKA, Will: “The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism? New Debates on Inclusion and Accommodation in Diverse Societies”, International Social Science Journal, 2010, Volume 61, No 199, pp. 97-112.
• KYMLICKA, Will: “Multicultural Citizenship within Multinational States”, Ethnicities, 2011, Volume 11, No 3, pp. 281-302.
• KYMLICKA, Will: “Transitional Justice, Federalism, and the Accommodation of Minority Nationalism”, (Ed.) ARTHUR, Paige: Identities in Transition: Challenges for Transnational Justice in Divided Societies, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2011, pp. 303-333.
• KYMLICKA, Will: “The Essentialist Critique of Multiculturalism: Theory, Policies and Ethos”, (Eds.) MODOOD, Tariq / UBEROI, Varun: Multiculturalism Rethought: Essays in Honour of Bhikhu Parekh, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2015, pp. 209-249.
• KYMLICKA, Will / PFOSTL, Eva: “Introduction”, (Eds.) KYMLICKA, Will / PFOSTL, Eva: Multiculturalism and Minority Rights in the Arab World, Oxford University Press, New York, 2014, pp. 1-24.
• LEARMONTH, Andrew: “Boris Johnson Publishes Response to SNP’s Section 30 Request”, The National, 14 January 2020, accessed at: https://www.thenational.scot/news/18158724.johnson-publishes-response-snps-section-30-request, accessed on: 26.08.2020.
• LISTER, Frederick: The European Union, the United Nations, and the Revival of Confederal Governance, Greenwood Press, London, 1996.
• LOCK, Tobias: “Negotiating EU Accession: Lessons for an Independent Scotland”, (Ed.) HUGHES, Kirsty: An Independent Scotland in the EU: Issues for Accession, Scottish Centre on European Relations Publication Office, Edinburgh, 2020, pp. 9-12.
• LOUGHLIN, John / ANTUNES, Sandrina: “State Rescaling and a ‘Europe of the Regions’ in Small Unitary States: A Damp Squib?”, Regional & Federal Studies, 2020, Volume 30, No 2, pp. 303-321.
• MACNAB, Scott: “Scottish Parliament Backs Holding Indyref2 Vote This Year”, The Scotsman, 29 January 2020, accessed at: https://www.scotsman.com/news/scottish-news/scottish-parliament-backs-holding-indyref2-vote-year-1395741, accessed on: 27.08.2020.
• MALIKI-ALIYEV, Kamal: “Comparing the Åland Islands Precedent and the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Research Note”, Journal of Autonomy and Security Studies, 2018, Volume 2, No 2, pp. 106-117.
• MARGALIT, Avishai / RAZ, Joseph: “National Self-Determination”, Journal of Philosophy, 1990, Volume 87, No 9, pp. 439-461.
• MAS, Joaquin: “Secession and Federalism: The Spanish Case”, (Eds.) LOPEZ-BASAGUREN, Alberto / SAN-EPIFANIO, L. Escajedo: Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain, Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 389-404.
• MASTROMARINO, Anna: “Secessionist Claims in a Federal System: The Belgian Case”, (Eds.) LOPEZ-BASAGUREN, Alberto / SAN-EPIFANIO, L. Escajedo: Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain, Springer, New York, 2019, pp. 221-232.
• MAZOWER, Mark: “Minorities and the League of Nations in Interwar Europe”, (Ed.) CASTELLINO, Joshua: Global Minority Rights, Ashgate, Dartmouth, 2012, pp. 17-33.
• MCDONALD, Michael: “Should Communities Have Rights? Reflections on Liberal Individualism”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1991, Volume 4, No 2, pp. 217-237.
• MCEWEN, Nicola: “Devolution and Alignment with EU Laws”, (Ed.) HUGHES, Kirsty: An Independent Scotland in the EU: Issues for Accession, Scottish Centre on European Relations Publication Office, Edinburgh, 2020, pp. 13-16.
• MEER, Nasar: “Looking up in Scotland? Multinationalism, Multiculturalism and Political Elites”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2015, Volume 38, No 9, pp. 1477-1496.
• MILLER, David: On Nationality, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.
• MULLEN, Tom: “Brexit and the Territorial Governance of the United Kingdom”, Contemporary Social Science, 2019, Volume 14, No 2, pp. 276-293.
• NARVESON, Jan: “Collective Rights?”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 1991, Volume 4, No 2, pp. 329-345.
• NUTT, Kathleen: “Scotland could Rejoin EU Four-Five Years after Indy, Expert Says”, The National, 22 May 2020, accessed at: https://www.thenational.scot/news/18469817.scotland-rejoin-eu-four-five-years-indy-expert-says, accessed on: 19.08.2020.
• OESTREICH, Joel: “Liberal Theory and Minority Rights Group”, Human Rights Quarterly, 1999, Volume 21, No 1, pp. 108-132.
• OSCE: Guidelines to Assist National Minority Participation in the Electoral Process, OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Warsaw, 2001.
• PERRY, Valery: “Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Does the Road to Confederation Go through the EU?”, International Peacekeeping, 2015, Volume 22, No 5, pp. 490-510.
• PREECE, Jennifer: “Minority Rights in Europe: From Westphalia to Helsinki”, Review of International Studies, 1997, Volume 23, No 1, pp. 75-92.
• PREECE, Jennifer: “National Minority Rights vs. State Sovereignty in Europe: Changing Norms in International Relations?”, Nations and Nationalism, 1997, Volume 3, No 3, pp. 345-364.
• RAZ, Joseph: “Multiculturalism”, Ratio Juris, 1998, Volume 11, No 3, pp. 193-205.
• READ, Carly: “Scottish Parliament to Keep Flying EU Flag after Brexit in Huge Snub to Referendum Result”, The Express, 29 January 2020, accessed at: https://www.express.co.uk/news/poli-tics/123-5177/scottish-parliament-eu-flag-brexit-day-snp-nicola-sturgeon-latest, accessed on: 29.08.2020.
• ROBERTSON, Angus: “A Whopping Majority Believes Scotland has Right to Decide over Indyref2”, The Scotsman, 28 January 2020, accessed at: https://www.scotsman.com/news/po-litics/scottish-independence/whopping-majority-believes-scotland-has-right-decide-over-in-dyref2-angus-robertson-1376832, accessed on 24.08.2020.
• SPINNER, Jeff: The Boundaries of Citizenship: Race, Ethnicity and Nationality in the Liberal State, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1994.
• STEPAN, Alfred: “A Revised Theory of Federacy and a Case Study of Civil War Termination in Aceh, Indonesia”, (Eds.) MCEVOY, Joanne / O’LEARY, Brendan: Power Sharing in Deeply Divided Places, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2013, pp. 231-252.
• STEVENS, Michael: “Asymmetrical Federalism: The Federal Principle and the Survival of the Small Republic”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1977, Volume 7, No 4, pp. 177-203.
• STURGEON, Nicola: “Nicola Sturgeon Responds to the Brexit Vote – Read her Speech in Full”, Holyrood, 24 June 2016, accessed at: https://www.holyrood.com/articles/inside-politics/%20-nicola-sturgeon-responds-brexit-vote-read-her-speech- full, accessed on: 01.09.2020.
• STURGEON, Nicola: “We’ve Made a Real Difference: Nicola Sturgeon Reflects on 20 Years of Devolution”, Yes, 1 July 2019, accessed at: https://www.yes.scot/weve-made-a-real-difference-nicola-sturgeon-reflects-on-20-years-of-devolution/, accessed on: 30.08.2020.
• SWAN, Brown / CETRA, Daniel: “Why Stay Together? State Nationalism and Justifications for State Unity in Spain and the UK”, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 2020, Volume 26, No 1, pp. 46-65.
• TAMIR, Yael: Liberal Nationalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1993.
• THORNBERRY, Patrick: “Historical Background: International Law Moves from Protection of Particular Groups to Norms of a Universal Character”, (Ed.) CASTELLINO, Joshua: Global Minority Rights, Ashgate, Dartmouth, 2012, pp. 3-15.
• TIERNEY, Stephen: “Legal Issues Surrounding the Referendum on Independence for Scotland”, European Constitutional Law Review, 2013, Volume 9, No 3, pp. 359-390.
• TIERNEY, Stephen: “Reclaiming Politics: Popular Democracy in Britain after the Scottish Referendum”, The Political Quarterly, 2015, Volume 86, No 2, pp. 226-233.
• VAN DYKE, Vernon: “The Individual, the State and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory”, World Politics, 1997, Volume 29, No 3, pp. 343-369.
• WAGNER, Andrea / MARIN, Jianna / KROQI, Dorian: “The Catalan Struggle for Independence and the Role of the European Union”, Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2019, Volume 11, No 5, pp. 787-803.
• WALDRON, Jeremy: “Minority Cultures and Cosmopolitan Alternatives”, (Ed.) KYMLICKA, Will: The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995, pp. 93-119.
• WATTS, Ronald: “Federalism, Federal Political Systems, and Federations”, Annual Review of Political Science, 1998, Volume 1, No 1, pp. 117-137.
• WEBSTER, Laura: “Unionists Furious as EU Boss Indicates Indy Scotland can Rejoin”, The National, 20 May 2020, accessed at: https://www.thenational.scot/news/18462298.unionists-furious-eu-boss-indicates-indy-scotland-can-rejoin, accessed on 23.08.2020.
• WIRT, Frederick: “The Tenacity of Confederacy: Local Service Agreements in the Family of Governments”, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 1982, Volume 12, No 4, pp. 103-127.
• WOLFF, Stefan: “Post-Conflict State Building: The Debate on Institutional Choice”, Third World Quarterly, 2011, Volume 32, No 10, pp. 1777-1802.
• WOLFF, Stefan: “Conflict Management in Divided Societies: The Many Uses of Territorial Self-Governance”, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 2013, Volume 20, No 1, pp. 27-50.
• ZULEEG, Fabian: “Transition from the UK and to the EU”, (Ed.) HUGHES, Kirsty: An Independent Scotland in the EU: Issues for Accession, Scottish Centre on European Relations Publication Office, Edinburgh, 2020, pp. 17-19.