Yıl 2019, Cilt 7 , Sayı 4, Sayfalar 9 - 21 2019-08-27

Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi
The Effects of Psychological Capital on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment And Cynicism

Cem ŞEN [1] , İbrahim Sani MERT [2]


Psikolojik sermaye son zamanlarda işletme yazınında üzerinde oldukça durulan bir değişken olmuştur. Yerli ve uluslararası yazında psikolojik sermayenin örgütsel sonuç değişkenleri ile olan etkileri inceleyen çalışmaların sayısı artmıştır. Yapılan bu çalışmada, psikolojik sermayenin iş tatmini, örgütsel bağlılık ve sinizm üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. Yapılan araştırma nicel araştırma deseni kullanan, kesitsel bir alan araştırması olup, araştırma kapsamındaki veriler savunma sektöründe faaliyet gösteren üç farklı şirkette çalışan toplam 295 katılımcıdan elde edilmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bulgulara göre psikolojik sermaye, araştırmanın bağımlı değişkenleri olan iş tatmini, örgütsel bağlılık ve sinizmi anlamlı olarak yordamaktadır.

Psychological capital has recently been a highly discussed variable in business literature. The number of studies that has examined the effects of psychological capital on the organizational outcome variables has been increased in the native and international literature. In this study, the effect of psychological capital on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and cynicism is examined. In this study which is a field research using quantitative research design, the data is obtained from a total of 295 participants who work in three different companies in the defense industry. According to the findings obtained from the research, psychological capital has a meaningful effect on the study’s dependent variables which are job satisfaction, organizational commitment and cynicism.

  • Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126 (3), 269-292.
  • Agho, A.O., Price, J.L. ve Mueller, C.W. (1992). Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65: 185-196.
  • Akçay, V.H. (2011). Pozitif psikolojik sermaye kavramı ve işletmelerde sürdürülebilir rekabet üstünlüğünü sağlamadaki rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (1), 73-98.
  • Allen, N.J. ve Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63: 1-18.
  • Andersson, L.M. (1996). Employee cynicism: An examination using a contract violation framework. Human Relations, 49 (11), 1395-1418.
  • Andersson, L.M. ve Bateman, T.S. (1997). Cynicism in the workplace: Some causes and effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (5), 449-469.
  • Ardichvili, A. (2011). Invited reaction: Meta-analysis of the impact of psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22: 153-156.
  • Avey, J.B., Hughes, L.W., Norman, S.M. ve Luthans, F. (2008). Using positivity, transformational leadership and empowerment to combat employee negativity. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 29 (2), 110-126.
  • Avey, J.B., Luthans, F., Smith, R. M. ve Palmer, N.F. (2010). Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15 (1), 17-28.
  • Avey, J.B., Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C.M. (2008a). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Institute Faculty Publications, Paper 6: 1-45.
  • Avey, J.B., Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C.M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36 (2), 430-452.
  • Avey, J.B., Wernsing, T.S. ve Luthans, F. (2008b). Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 48-70.
  • Avolio, B.J. ve Luthans, F. (2006). The high impact leader: Moments matter in accelerating authentic leadership development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Babin, B. ve Griffin, M. (1998). The nature of satisfaction: an updated examination and analysis. Journal of Business Research, 41 (2), 127-136.
  • Bakker, A.B. ve Schaufeli, W.B. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 147-154.
  • Barca, M. (2005). Stratejik yönetim düşüncesinin evrimi: bilimsel bir disiplinin oluşum hikâyesi. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (1), 7-39.
  • Barefoot, J.C., Dodge, K.A., Peterson, B.L., Dahlstrom, W.G. ve Williams, R.B. (1989). The Cook-Medley hostility scale: Item content and ability to predict survival. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51: 46-57.
  • Becker, T., Billings, E., Eveleth, D. ve Gilbert, N. (1996). Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (2), 464-482.
  • Bedeian, A.G. (2007). Even if the tower is “ivory,” it isn’t “white:” understanding the consequences of faculty cynicism. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6 (1), 9-32.
  • Bernerth, J.B., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S. ve Walker H.J. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment a study of important organizational change variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43 (3), 309-319.
  • Bommer, W.H., Rich, G. ve Rubin, R.S. (2005). Changing attitudes about change: longitudinal effects of transformational leader behavior on employee cynicism about organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (7), 733-753.
  • Bono, J.E., ve Judge, T.A. (2003). Core self-evaluations: a review of the trait and its role in job satisfaction and job performance. European Journal of Personality, 17: 5-18.Bowling, N.A., Wang, Q. ve Li, H.Y. (2012). The moderating effect of core self-evaluations on the relationships between job attitudes and organisational citizenship behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61 (1), 97-113.
  • Brandes, P. (1997). Organizational cynicism: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Cincinnati University.
  • Brandes, P. ve Das, D. (2006). Locating behavioral cynicism at work: Construct issues and performance implications. P.L. Perrewe ve D.C. Ganster (Ed.), Employee health, coping and methodologies (s.233-266). New York: JAI Press.
  • Brandes, P., Das, D. ve Hadeni, M. (2006). Organizational cynicism: A field examination using global and local social exchange relationships and workplace outcomes. G.B. Grean ve J.A. Grean (Ed.), Sharing network leadership (s.191-224). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Brandes, P., Castro, S.L., James, M.S.L., Martinez, A.D., Matherly, T.A., Ferris, G.R. ve Hochwarter, W.A. (2008). The interactive effects of job insecurity and organizational cynicism on work effort following a layoff. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14 (3), 233-247.
  • Byrne, Z. ve Hochwarter, W.A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23: 54-72.
  • Cameron, K. S. (2005). Organizational effectiveness: its demise and re-emergence through positive organizational scholarship. K.G. Smith ve M.A. Hitt (Ed.), Great minds in management (s.304-330). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E., ve Quinn, R.E. (2003). Organizational virtuousness and performance. K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton ve R.E. Quinn (Ed.), Positive organizational scholarship foundations of a new discipline (s.48-65). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
  • Cartwright S. ve Holmes N. (2006). The meaning of work: the challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16: 199-208.
  • Chandrasekar, T. ve Chidambaram, V. (2015). The impact of big five personality traits and positive psychological strengths towards job satisfaction: A review. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, 23 (2), 142-150.
  • Cole, M.S., Bruch, H. ve Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27: 463-484.
  • Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O. ve Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 425-445.
  • Colquitt, J.A., Lepine, J.A. ve Wesson, M.J. (2015). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace, 4th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Compton, W.C. (2005). Introduction to positive psychology. Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
  • Cook, WW. ve Medley, D.M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scale for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38 (6), 414-418.
  • Crook, T. R., Ketchen Jr., D. J., Combs, J. G. ve Todd, S. Y. (2008). Strategic resources and performance: A meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1141-1154.
  • Çelik, M., Turunç, Ö. ve Bilgin, N. (2014). Çalışanların örgütsel adalet algılarının psikolojik sermaye üzerine etkisi: Çalışanların iyilik halinin düzenleyici rolü. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16 (4), 559-585.
  • Çetin, F. (2011). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarının açıklanmasında örgütsel bağlılık, iş tatmini, kişilik ve örgüt kültürünün rolü. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İşletme Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
  • Çetin, F. (2011a). The effects of the organizational psychological capital on the attitudes of commitment and satisfaction: A public sample in Turkey. European Journal of Social Sciences, 21 (3), 373-380.
  • Çetin, F. ve Basım, H.N. (2011). Psikolojik dayanıklılığın iş tatmini ve örgütsel bağlılık tutumlarındaki rolü. İş Güç Endüstri İlişkileri ve İnsan Kaynakları Dergisi, 13 (3), 79-94.
  • Çetin, F. ve Basım, H.N. (2012). Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. TODAİE AMME İdaresi Dergisi, 45 (1), 121-137.
  • Davis, W.D. ve Gardner, W.L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15:439-465.
  • Dean, J.W., Brandes, P. ve Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 341-352.
  • DeCotiis, T.A. ve Summers T.P. (1987). A Path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations, 40 (7), 445-470.
  • Donaldson, S.I. ve Ko, I. (2010). Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship: A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5 (3), 177-191.
  • Eaton, J.A. (2000). A social motivation approach to organizational cynicism. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Graduate Program in Psychology, York University, Toronto.
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. ve Davis-Lamastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 51-59.
  • Ensher, E.A., Grant-Vallone, E.J. ve Donaldson, S.I. (2001). Effects of perceived discrimination on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, and grievances. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12 (1), 53-72.
  • Etebarian, A., Tavakoli, S. ve Abzari, M. (2012). The relationship between psychological capital and organizational commitment. African Journal of Business Management, 6 (14), 5057-5060.
  • Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
  • Ferres, N. ve Connel, J. (2004). Emotional intelligence in leaders: An antidote for cynicism towards change. Strategic Change, 13 (2), 61-71.
  • Fleming, P. (2005). Workers playtime? Boundaries and cynicism in a “culture of fun” program. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41 (1), 285-303.
  • Folger, R. ve Cropanzano, (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. London: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Froh, J. (2004). The history of positive psychology: truth be told. New York State (NYS) Psychologist: 18-20.
  • Gable, S.L. ve Haidt, J. (2005). What (and why) is positive psychology? Review of General Psychology, 9 (2), 103-110.
  • George, J.M., Reed, T.F., Ballard, K.A., Colin, I. ve Fielding, I. (1993). Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: Effects of organizational and social support. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 157-171.
  • Goldsmith, A.H., Veum, J.R. ve Darity, W.Jr. (1997). The impact of psychological and human capital on wages. Economic Inquiry, XXXV: 815-829.
  • Greenberg, J. ve Baron, R.A. (2000). Behavior in organizations, 7th Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Grusky, O. (1966). Career mobility and organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10: 488-503.
  • Gutierrez, A., Candela, L. ve Carver, L. (2012). The structural relationships between organizational commitment, global job satisfaction, developmental experiences, work values, organizational support, and person-organization fit among nursing faculty. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68 (7), 1601-1614.
  • Gürbüz, S. ve Sığrı, Ü. (2013). Örgütsel davranışa giriş. Ü. Sığrı ve S. Gürbüz (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış (s.1-44). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Gygax, M., Ticino, L. ve Fitzgerald, S.P. (2011). Enriching the positive organizational behavior framework with wisdom. International Journal of Business Research, 11 (2), 23-41.
  • Hackman, J.R. ve Oldham, C.R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 159-170.
  • Hefferon, K. ve Boniwell, I. (2011). Positive psychology: Theory, research and applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Huang, Y.H., Shawaand, W. ve Chen, P. (2004). Worker perceptions of organizational support and return-to-work policy: Associations with post-injury job satisfaction, Work, 23 (3), 225-232.
  • Irving, P.G., Coleman, D.F. ve Bobocel, D.R. (2005). The moderating effect of negative affectivity in the procedural justice-job satisfaction relation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37 (1), 20-32.
  • James, S.M. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of cynicism in organizations: An examination of potential positive and negative effects on school systems. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, College of Business, Florida State University.
  • Judge, T.A., Hulin, C.L. ve Dalal, R.S. (2009). Job satisfaction and job affect, the Oxford handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Judge, T.A. ve Llies, R. (2004). Research edge: Is positiveness in organizations always desirable? The Academy of Management Executive, 18 (4), 151-155.
  • Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A. ve Durham, C.C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19: 151-188.
  • Judge, T.A., Locke, E.A., Durham, C.C. ve Kluger, A.N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83: 17-34.
  • Kanter, D.L. ve Mirvis, P.H. (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kanter, R.M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: a study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 33 (4), 499-517.
  • Kaplan, M. ve Öğüt, A. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel destek ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin analizi: otel işletmelerinde bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (1), 387-401.
  • Katz, D. ve Kahn R.L. (1966). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • Kauffman, C. (2006). Positive psychology: the science at the heart of coaching. D.R. Stober ve A.M. Grant (Ed.), Evidence based coaching handbook putting best practices to work for your clients (s.219-253). New Jersey: John Wiles & Sons.
  • Kittinger, J.D., Walker, A.G., Cope, J.G. ve Wuensch, K.L. (2009). The relationship between core self-evaluations and affective commitment. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management, 68-92.
  • Kobau, R., Seligman, M.E.P., Peterson, C., Zack, M.M., Chapman, D. ve Thompson, W. (2011). Improving uptake of essential services mental health promotion in public health: perspectives and strategies from positive psychology. American Journal of Public Health, August 2011, 101 (8), e2-e9.
  • Kristof-Brown, A.L., Zimmerman, R.D. ve Johnson, E.C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58: 281-342.
  • Larson, M. ve Luthans, F. (2006). Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitudes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13 (1), 45-62.
  • Linley, P.A., Joseph, S., Harrington, S. ve Wood, A.M. (2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1 (1), 3-16.
  • Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol.1, 1297-1343.
  • Luthans, F. (2002b). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16 (1), 57-72.
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J. Avey, J.B. ve Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60: 541-572.
  • Luthans, F., Luthans, K.W. ve Luthans, B.C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47 (1), 45-50.
  • Luthans, F., Norman, S.M., Avolio, B.J. ve Avey, J.B. (2008a). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate-employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29: 219-238.
  • Luthans, F. ve Youssef, C.M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33 (2), 143-160.
  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M. ve Avolio, B.J. (2007a). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
  • McDonald, D.J. ve Makin, P.J. (2000). The psychological contract, organizational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21 (2), 84-91.
  • McMurray, A.J., Pirola-Merlo, A., Sarros, J.C. ve Islam, M.M. (2010). Leadership, climate, psychological capital, commitment, and wellbeing in a non-profit organization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31 (5), 436-457.
  • Meyer, J.P. ve Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resources Management Review, 1: 61-89.
  • Meyer, J.P. ve Allen, N.J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research and application. London: Sage Publications.
  • Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovitch L. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: Meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61 (1), 20-52.
  • Meyerson, D.E. (1990). Uncovering socially undesirable emotions: Experiences of role ambiguity in organizations. American Behavioral Scientist, 33 (3), 296-307.
  • Mirvis, P.H. ve Kanter, D.L. (1991). Beyond demography: A psychographic profile of the workforce. Human Resource Management, 30 (1), 45-68.
  • Moorman, R., Blakely, G. ve Niehoff, B. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41 (3), 351-357.
  • Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. ve Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
  • Naus, A.J.A.M. (2007). Organizational cynicism on the nature, antecedents, and consequences of employee cynicism toward the employing organization, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Maastricht University.
  • Newman, A., Üçbaşaran, D., Zhu, F. ve Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35: S120-S138.
  • Nitesh, S., Nandakumar, V.M. ve Asok, K.S. (2013). Role of pay as perceived organizational support contributes to employee’s organizational commitment. Advances in Management, 6 (8), 52-54.
  • Örücü, E., Yumuşak, S. ve Bozkır, Y. (2006). Kalite yönetimi çerçevesinde bankalarda çalışan personelin iş tatmini ve iş tatminini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 13 (1), 39-51.
  • Özcan, E.D. (2011). Kişilik bakış açısından örgüt yapısı ve iş tatmini. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Özgener, Ş., Öğüt, A. ve Kaplan, M. (2008). İşgören-işveren ilişkilerinde yeni bir paradigma: örgütsel sinizm. M. Özdevecioğlu ve H. Kaplan (Ed.), Örgütsel davranışta seçme konular (s.53-72). Ankara: G.Ü.V. İlke Yayınevi.
  • Paşamehmetoğlu, A. ve Yeloğlu, H.O. (2013). Motivasyon. Ü. Sığrı ve S. Gürbüz (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış (s.137-174). İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
  • Peterson, S.J., Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O. ve Zhang, Z. (2011). Psychological capital and employee performance: A latent growth modeling approach. Personnel Psychology, 64: 427-450.
  • Premeaux, S.R. ve Mondy, R.W. (1986). Problem employees: The cynic. Management Solutions, 14-17.
  • Qadeer, F. ve Jaffery, H. (2014). Mediation of psychological capital between organizational climate and organizational citizenship behavior. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 8 (2), 453-470.
  • Robbins, S.P. ve Judge, T.A. (2012). Örgütsel davranış. (Çev.: Prof.Dr. İnci Erdem). İstanbul: Nobel.
  • Rode, J.C. (2004). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction revisited: A longitudinal test of an integrated model. Human Relations, 57 (9), 1205-1230.
  • Saekoo, A. (2011). Examining the effect of trust, procedural justice, perceived organizational support, commitment, and job satisfaction in Royal Thai Police: The empirical investigation in social exchange perspective. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 11 (3), 229-237.
  • Schultz, D.P ve Schultz, S.E. (1990). Psychology and industry today: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology, 5th Ed. New York: MacMillan.
  • Scott, W.R. ve Davis, G.F. (2007). Organizations and organizing rational, natural and open systems perspectives. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
  • Scott, K.A. ve Zweig, D. (2008). Dispositional predictors of organizational cynicism. Administrative Sciences Association of Canada: 95-113.
  • Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Seligman, M.E.P. ve Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5-14.
  • Seligman, M.E.P., Parks, A.C. ve Steen, T. (2004). A balanced psychology and a full life. The Royal Society, 359: 1379-1381.
  • Shabir, M., Abrar, M., Baig, S.A. ve Javed, M. (2014). The contribution of workplace incivility and psychological capital toward job stress. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4 (2), 1-17.
  • Shahnawaz, M.G. ve Jafri, M.H. (2009). Psychological capital as predictors of organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35: 78-84.
  • Sheldon, M.E. (1971). Investments and involvements as mechanisms producing commitment to the organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 143-150.
  • Sheldon, K.M. ve King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 216-217.
  • Sığrı, Ü. ve Basım, H.N. (2006), İş görenlerin iş doyumu ile örgütsel bağlılık düzeylerinin analizi: Kamu ve özel sektörde karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (12), 131-154.
  • Stajkovic, A.D. ve Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124 (2), 240-261.
  • Stanley, D.J., Meyer, J.P. ve Topolnytsky L. (2005). Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19 (4), 429-459.
  • Steers, R.M. (1981). Introduction to organizational behavior. Santa Monica-California: Oodyear Publishing Company Inc.
  • Tan, S.J. ve Tan, K.L. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of skepticism toward health claims: An empirical investigation of Singaporean consumers. Journal of Marketing Communications, 13 (1), 59-82.
  • Totawar, A.K. ve Nambudiri, R. (2014). How does organizational justice influence job satisfaction and organizational commitment? Explaining with psychological capital. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 39 (2), 83-97.
  • Turner, N., Barling, J. ve Zacharatos, A. (2002). Positive psychology at work. C.R. Snyder ve S.J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (s.715-728). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Ugboro, I. ve Obeng, K. (2000). Top management leadership, employee empowerment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in total quality management organizations: An empirical study. Journal of Quality Management, 5: 247-272.
  • Vazquez, C., Hervas, G., Rahona, J.J. ve Gomez, D. (2009). Psychological well-being and health: contributions of positive psychology. Annuary of Clinical and Health Psychology (APCS), 5: 15-27.
  • Vitell, S.J. ve Singhapakdi, A. (2008). The role of ethics institutionalization in influencing organizational commitment, job satisfaction and esprit de corps. Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (2), 343-353.
  • Vroom, V.H. (1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E. ve Austin, J.T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change: Measurement, antecedents, and correlates. Group and Organization Management, 25 (2), 132-53.
  • Wasti, S.A. (1999). A cultural analysis of organizational commitment and turnover intentions in a collectivist society. Academy of Management Proceedings: B1-B6.
  • Watson, D. (2002). Positive affectivity: The disposition to experience pleasurable emotional states. C.R. Snyder ve S.J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (s. 106-120). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wilkerson, J., Evans, W. ve Davis, W. (2008). A test of coworkers' influence on organizational cynicism, badmouthing, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (9), 2273-2292.
  • Wright, P.M., Dunford, B.B. ve Snell, S.A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view. Journal of Management, 27: 701-721.
  • Wright, T.A. (2003), Positive organizational behavior: An idea whose time has truly come. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24: 437-442.
  • Yoon, J. ve Thye, S. (2002). A dual process model of organizational commitment: Job satisfaction and organizational support. Work & Occupations, 29 (1), 97-124.
  • Youssef, C.M. ve Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33 (5), 774-800.
  • Yousef, D.A. (1998). Satisfaction with job security as a predictor of organizational commitment and job performance in a multicultural environment. International Journal of Manpower, 19 (2), 184-194.
Birincil Dil tr
Konular Sosyal
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Orcid: 0000-0002-7300-0170
Yazar: Cem ŞEN (Sorumlu Yazar)
Kurum: MİLLİ SAVUNMA BAKANLIĞI
Ülke: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-2850-1865
Yazar: İbrahim Sani MERT
Kurum: ANTALYA BİLİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Ülke: Turkey


Tarihler

Yayımlanma Tarihi : 27 Ağustos 2019

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { anemon453906, journal = {Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2149-4622}, address = {}, publisher = {Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi}, year = {2019}, volume = {7}, pages = {9 - 21}, doi = {10.18506/anemon.453906}, title = {Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi}, key = {cite}, author = {ŞEN, Cem and MERT, İbrahim Sani} }
APA ŞEN, C , MERT, İ . (2019). Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi , 7 (4) , 9-21 . DOI: 10.18506/anemon.453906
MLA ŞEN, C , MERT, İ . "Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi". Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7 (2019 ): 9-21 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/anemon/issue/48060/453906>
Chicago ŞEN, C , MERT, İ . "Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi". Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7 (2019 ): 9-21
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi AU - Cem ŞEN , İbrahim Sani MERT Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.18506/anemon.453906 DO - 10.18506/anemon.453906 T2 - Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 9 EP - 21 VL - 7 IS - 4 SN - -2149-4622 M3 - doi: 10.18506/anemon.453906 UR - https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.453906 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi %A Cem ŞEN , İbrahim Sani MERT %T Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi %D 2019 %J Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi %P -2149-4622 %V 7 %N 4 %R doi: 10.18506/anemon.453906 %U 10.18506/anemon.453906
ISNAD ŞEN, Cem , MERT, İbrahim Sani . "Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi". Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 7 / 4 (Ağustos 2019): 9-21 . https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.453906
AMA ŞEN C , MERT İ . Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; 7(4): 9-21.
Vancouver ŞEN C , MERT İ . Psikolojik Sermayenin İş Tatmini, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Sinizm Üzerindeki Etkisi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; 7(4): 21-9.