Research Article

Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon's Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS

Volume: 31 Number: 2 March 25, 2025
EN

Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon's Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS

Abstract

Soil erosion is one of the most important and critical processes occurring in Türkiye, as in all parts of the world. It is of great importance to understand the processes that occur as soil erosion continues. The aim of this study is to determine the erosion susceptibility occurring in the Çapakçur Stream basin, one of the important erosion areas of Türkiye. In the study, erosion susceptibility analysis was carried out using 4 different methods Shannon Entropy (SE), Logistic Regression (LR), Frequency Ratio (FR) and Weight of Evidence (WoE) that are effectively used today in erosion susceptibility analysis and determination of critical areas in terms of erosion, and 19 conditioning factors based on these methods. Analysis Results Model performances were evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Area under the Curve (AUC) values based on a dataset consisting of 840 training (70%) and 360 testing (30%) points. According to result of the AUC values show that Logistic regression seems to perform well on both training (AUC= 94.7%) and validating datasets (AUC=93.5%). On the other hand, Weight of Evidence training (AUC= 93.5%) and testing datasets (AUC= 91.4%), Frequency Ratio training (AUC= 93.5%) and testing datasets (AUC=92.4%) of the Weight of Evidence result show that AUC and ROC values similar to Logistic Regression result, but slightly lower than Logistic Regression. Additionally, Shannon Entropy shows that it performs lower than other methods on both training (AUC= 55.7%) and testing datasets (AUC= 56.3%). Conducting analyses based on these methods, especially in erosion susceptibility studies, will facilitate both planning and the accuracy of the results obtained.

Keywords

References

  1. Ait Neceur H, Abdo H G, Igmoullan B, Namous M, Alshehri F & A Albanai J (2024). Implementation of random forest, adaptive boosting, and gradient boosting decision trees algorithms for gully erosion susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Earth Sciences 83(3): 121 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11424-5
  2. Akgün A (2007). Ayvalık ve yakın çevresinin erozyon ve heyelan duyarlılığının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri tabanlı incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üni. Fen Bilimleri Ens. İzmir.
  3. Akıncı H, Özalp A Y & Kılıçer S T (2015). Assessment of landslide susceptibility in planned areas using geographic information systems and AHP method: Artvin Example. Journal of Natural Hazards and Environment 1(1-2): 40-53 (In Turkish)
  4. Akıncı H, Doğan S & Kılıçoğlu C (2017). Landslide susceptibility mapping of Canik (Samsun) district using bayesian probability and frequency ratio models. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 5(3): 283- 299 https://doi.org/10.15317/scitech.2017.89
  5. Al-Hinai H & Abdalla R (2021). Mapping Coastal Flood Susceptible Areas Using Shannon’s Entropy Model: The Case of Muscat Governorate, Oman. ISPRS Int J Geo-Information 10: 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040252
  6. Amiri M, Pourghasemi H R, Ghanbarian G A & Afzali S F (2019). Assessment of the importance of gully erosion effective factors using Boruta algorithm and its spatial modeling and mapping using three machine learning algorithms. Geoderma 340: 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.12.042
  7. Anabalagan R (1992). Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32: 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(92)90053-2
  8. Anonymous (1998). Management of Agricultural and Pasture Lands. National Environmental Action Plan. DTP, Ankara. (In Turkish)

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Geospatial Information Systems and Geospatial Data Modelling, Soil Physics, Conservation and Improvement of Soil and Water Resources

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 25, 2025

Submission Date

August 20, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 23, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 31 Number: 2

APA
İnik, O., & Utlu, M. (2025). Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(2), 538-557. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1535974
AMA
1.İnik O, Utlu M. Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2025;31(2):538-557. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1535974
Chicago
İnik, Orhan, and Mustafa Utlu. 2025. “Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) With GIS”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31 (2): 538-57. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1535974.
EndNote
İnik O, Utlu M (March 1, 2025) Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31 2 538–557.
IEEE
[1]O. İnik and M. Utlu, “Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 538–557, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.1535974.
ISNAD
İnik, Orhan - Utlu, Mustafa. “Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) With GIS”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31/2 (March 1, 2025): 538-557. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1535974.
JAMA
1.İnik O, Utlu M. Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2025;31:538–557.
MLA
İnik, Orhan, and Mustafa Utlu. “Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) With GIS”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, Mar. 2025, pp. 538-57, doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1535974.
Vancouver
1.Orhan İnik, Mustafa Utlu. Comparison of Logistic Regression, Frequency Ratio, Weight of Evidence and Shannon’s Entropy Models in Erosion Susceptibility Analysis in Bingöl (Türkiye) with GIS. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2025 Mar. 1;31(2):538-57. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1535974

Cited By

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published as open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).