Turkey is one of the main fig fruits producers in the World. The protection of the fig fruit quality in the chains from
harvesting to marketing is very important. Vibration often causes some damages to perishable fruits in transportation
and reduces their quality. The fruit injury due to vibration is related to the transportation characteristics of vehicles,
packaging boxes and the conditions of the roads. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of
packaging box by different materials to decrease the damages of vertical vibration on the quality of three fresh fig
varieties (Yediveren, Sarilop and Bursa Black) during transportation. The experiments were carried out in two stages.
In the first stage; the frequency and acceleration values of truck were determined during the real transportation. In the
second stage, these values were applied on the simulator (shaker) to examine the effect of vibration on fresh figs
packaged with three different boxes. The results showed that the cardboard packaging box was not proper for
transporting of the fresh fig fruits in all road conditions. The mass loss of fresh fig fruits packed with cardboard box
were found to be 2.5 times more than extruded and expanded polystyrene boxes at 16 Hz frequency and 2.54 m s-2
acceleration. Sarilop fig variety was more damaged under the off-road. For long highway road conditions, Bursa
Black fig variety was found the most affected fig variety.
Acıcan T, Alibas K & Özelkök I S (2007). Mechanical
damage to apples during transport in wooden crates.
Biosystems Engineering 96(2): 239–248
Aksoy U (1997). Why fig? An old taste and a new
perspective. Proceedings of the First International
Symposium on Fig. Acta Horticulture 489: 25-26
Alayunt F N, Çakmak B, Can Z & Aksoy U (2000). A
study on vibrational damage to some fig cultivars
using a simulator. XXIV. HAS-ATC Research and
Development Conference Proceedings. Kutatasi Es
Fejlesztesi Tanacskozas. Gödöllö- Hungary No 24
Barchi G L, Berardinelli A, Guarnieri A, Ragni L &
Totaro F C (2002). Damage to loquats by vibrationsimulating intra-state transport. Biosystems
Engineering 82(3): 305-312
Bollen, A F. & De La Rue, B T (1990). Handling impacts
for kiwifruit, Asian pears and apples. ASAE Paper No
90-6005
Burton C L, Brown G K, Shulte P N L & Timm E J
(1989). Apple bruising related to picking and hauling
impacts. ASAE Paper No 89-6049
Crisosto C H, Mitchell F G & Johnson S (1995). Factors
in fresh market stone fruit quality. Postharvest News
and Information 6(2): 17-21
Çakmak B, Can H Z, Akdeniz R C, Alayunt F N &
Aksoy U (2007). Taze incirin taşınması sırasında
paketleme özelliklerinin kalite kayıpları üzerine
etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
44(1): 123-135
Fischer D, Craig W L, Watada A E, Douglas W & Ashby
B H (1992). Simulated intransit vibration damage to
packaged fresh market grapes and strawberries.
Applied Engineering in Agriculture 8(3): 363-366
Goff J W & Twede D (1979). Boxes Bags and Cans:
Performance of Packages for the Transportation of
Agricultural Products. Michigan State University
Special Report 14
Jarimopas B, Singh S P & Saengnil W (2005).
Measurement and analysis of truck transport
vibration levels and damage to packaged tangerines
during transit. Packaging Technology and Science
18: 179-188
Kasmire R F & Kader A A (1978). Handling tomatoes at
wholesale and retail: A guide for better quality and
greater profits. Outlook 5(3): 5-12
Marcondes J & Sing S B (1989). Dynamic analysis of
less than truck load shipment. Paper 88-WA/EEP-17
ASME New York
O’Brien M & Guillou R (1969). An in-transit vibration
Simulator for fruit-handling studies. Transactions of
the ASAE 12(1): 94-97
O’Brien M, Gentry J P & Gibson R C (1965). Vibrating
characteristics of fruit as related to in-transit injury.
Transactions of the ASAE 8(2): 241-243
Öğüt H, Peker A & Aydin C (1999). Simulated transit
studies on peaches: effect of container, cushion
materials and vibrations on elasticity modulus.
Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin
America 30(3): 59–62
Özgüven F & Vursavus K (2002). Domateste oluşan
mekanik zedelenme üzerine taşıma sırasındaki
titreşim etkilerinin araştırılması. Çukurova
Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17(2): 33-40
Peleg K & Hinga S (1986). Simulation of vibration
damage in produce transportation. Transactions of
the ASAE 29(2): 633-641
Pierce C D, Singh S P & Burgess G (1992). A
comparison of leaf spring with air-cushion trailer
suspension in the transport environment. Packaging
Technology and Science 5: 11-15
Singh A & Singh Y (1992). Effects of vibration during
transportation on the quality of tomatoes.
Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin
America 23(2): 70-72
Singh S P & Xu M (1993). Bruising in apples as a
function of truck vibration and packaging. Applied
Engineering in Agriculture 9(5): 455-460
Slaughter D C, Hinsch R T & Thompson J F (1993).
Assessment of vibration injury to Bartlett pears.
Transactions of the ASAE 36(4):1043-1047
Slaughter D C, Thompson J F & Hinsch R T (1998).
Packaging barlett pears in polyethylene film bags to
reduce vibration injury in transit. Transaction of the
ASAE 41:107-114
Sommer N F (1957). Surface discoloration of pears.
California Agriculture 11(1):3-4
Turczyn M T, Grant S W, Ashby B H & Wheaton F W
(1986). Potato shatter bruising during laboratory
handling and transport simulation. Transactions of
the ASAE 29(4): 1171-1175
Vergano P J, Testin R F & Newall Jr W C (1991). Peach
bruising: susceptibility to impact, vibration, and
compression abuse. Transactions of the ASAE 34(5):
2110–2116
Vursavus K & Özgüven F (2004). Determining the
effects of vibration parameters and packaging method
on mechanical damage in golden delicious apple
variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
28: 311-320
Taze Đncir Meyvesinin Taşınması Sırasında Oluşan Kalite Kaybının Değerlendirilmesi
Türkiye, incir üretimiyle Dünyanın önemli üreticilerinden birisidir. Đncirin kalitesinin korunması hasattan pazara kadar büyük önem arz etmektedir. Titreşim çoğunlukla hassas meyvelere zarar vermekte ve kalitesini düşürmektedir. Titreşim nedeniyle oluşan hasarlar, taşıma yapan aracın karakteristiklerine, paketlemeye ve yol koşularına bağlı olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, üç çeşit taze incir meyvesinin (Yediveren, Sarılop ve Bursa Siyahı) taşınması sırasında titreşim hasarlarını azaltmak amacıyla farklı malzemeler kullanılarak yapılan kutuların etkinliği araştırılmıştır. Denemeler iki aşamalı olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Birinci aşamada, gerçek taşıma koşullarında kamyondaki frekans ve titreşim değerleri saptanmıştır. Đkinci aşamada bu değerler, üç farklı kutuyla paketlenen taze incirlerin üzerindeki titreşim etkisini saptamak için simülatörde (sarsıcıda) uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, bütün yol koşullarında karton kutuların taze incir meyvelerinin taşınması için uygun olmadığını göstermiştir. Karton kutularda taşınan meyvelerdeki kütle kaybı, ekstrüde polistiren ve ekspande polistiren taşıma kutulara göre otoyol taşıma koşularında (16 Hz – 2.54 m s-2) yaklaşık 2.5 kat daha fazla ölçülmüştür. Sarılop incir çeşidi bozuk yolda, Bursa Siyahı çeşidi ise uzun otoyol taşımasında daha fazla hasar gören çeşit olarak belirlenmiştir.
Acıcan T, Alibas K & Özelkök I S (2007). Mechanical
damage to apples during transport in wooden crates.
Biosystems Engineering 96(2): 239–248
Aksoy U (1997). Why fig? An old taste and a new
perspective. Proceedings of the First International
Symposium on Fig. Acta Horticulture 489: 25-26
Alayunt F N, Çakmak B, Can Z & Aksoy U (2000). A
study on vibrational damage to some fig cultivars
using a simulator. XXIV. HAS-ATC Research and
Development Conference Proceedings. Kutatasi Es
Fejlesztesi Tanacskozas. Gödöllö- Hungary No 24
Barchi G L, Berardinelli A, Guarnieri A, Ragni L &
Totaro F C (2002). Damage to loquats by vibrationsimulating intra-state transport. Biosystems
Engineering 82(3): 305-312
Bollen, A F. & De La Rue, B T (1990). Handling impacts
for kiwifruit, Asian pears and apples. ASAE Paper No
90-6005
Burton C L, Brown G K, Shulte P N L & Timm E J
(1989). Apple bruising related to picking and hauling
impacts. ASAE Paper No 89-6049
Crisosto C H, Mitchell F G & Johnson S (1995). Factors
in fresh market stone fruit quality. Postharvest News
and Information 6(2): 17-21
Çakmak B, Can H Z, Akdeniz R C, Alayunt F N &
Aksoy U (2007). Taze incirin taşınması sırasında
paketleme özelliklerinin kalite kayıpları üzerine
etkisi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
44(1): 123-135
Fischer D, Craig W L, Watada A E, Douglas W & Ashby
B H (1992). Simulated intransit vibration damage to
packaged fresh market grapes and strawberries.
Applied Engineering in Agriculture 8(3): 363-366
Goff J W & Twede D (1979). Boxes Bags and Cans:
Performance of Packages for the Transportation of
Agricultural Products. Michigan State University
Special Report 14
Jarimopas B, Singh S P & Saengnil W (2005).
Measurement and analysis of truck transport
vibration levels and damage to packaged tangerines
during transit. Packaging Technology and Science
18: 179-188
Kasmire R F & Kader A A (1978). Handling tomatoes at
wholesale and retail: A guide for better quality and
greater profits. Outlook 5(3): 5-12
Marcondes J & Sing S B (1989). Dynamic analysis of
less than truck load shipment. Paper 88-WA/EEP-17
ASME New York
O’Brien M & Guillou R (1969). An in-transit vibration
Simulator for fruit-handling studies. Transactions of
the ASAE 12(1): 94-97
O’Brien M, Gentry J P & Gibson R C (1965). Vibrating
characteristics of fruit as related to in-transit injury.
Transactions of the ASAE 8(2): 241-243
Öğüt H, Peker A & Aydin C (1999). Simulated transit
studies on peaches: effect of container, cushion
materials and vibrations on elasticity modulus.
Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin
America 30(3): 59–62
Özgüven F & Vursavus K (2002). Domateste oluşan
mekanik zedelenme üzerine taşıma sırasındaki
titreşim etkilerinin araştırılması. Çukurova
Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 17(2): 33-40
Peleg K & Hinga S (1986). Simulation of vibration
damage in produce transportation. Transactions of
the ASAE 29(2): 633-641
Pierce C D, Singh S P & Burgess G (1992). A
comparison of leaf spring with air-cushion trailer
suspension in the transport environment. Packaging
Technology and Science 5: 11-15
Singh A & Singh Y (1992). Effects of vibration during
transportation on the quality of tomatoes.
Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin
America 23(2): 70-72
Singh S P & Xu M (1993). Bruising in apples as a
function of truck vibration and packaging. Applied
Engineering in Agriculture 9(5): 455-460
Slaughter D C, Hinsch R T & Thompson J F (1993).
Assessment of vibration injury to Bartlett pears.
Transactions of the ASAE 36(4):1043-1047
Slaughter D C, Thompson J F & Hinsch R T (1998).
Packaging barlett pears in polyethylene film bags to
reduce vibration injury in transit. Transaction of the
ASAE 41:107-114
Sommer N F (1957). Surface discoloration of pears.
California Agriculture 11(1):3-4
Turczyn M T, Grant S W, Ashby B H & Wheaton F W
(1986). Potato shatter bruising during laboratory
handling and transport simulation. Transactions of
the ASAE 29(4): 1171-1175
Vergano P J, Testin R F & Newall Jr W C (1991). Peach
bruising: susceptibility to impact, vibration, and
compression abuse. Transactions of the ASAE 34(5):
2110–2116
Vursavus K & Özgüven F (2004). Determining the
effects of vibration parameters and packaging method
on mechanical damage in golden delicious apple
variety. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
28: 311-320
Çakmak, B., Alayunt, F., Akdeniz, C., Can, Z., et al. (2010). Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits during Transportation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(3), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001137
AMA
Çakmak B, Alayunt F, Akdeniz C, Can Z, Aksoy U. Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits during Transportation. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. September 2010;16(3):180-193. doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001137
Chicago
Çakmak, Bülent, Fazilet Alayunt, Cengiz Akdeniz, Zafer Can, and Uygun Aksoy. “Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits During Transportation”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16, no. 3 (September 2010): 180-93. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001137.
EndNote
Çakmak B, Alayunt F, Akdeniz C, Can Z, Aksoy U (September 1, 2010) Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits during Transportation. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16 3 180–193.
IEEE
B. Çakmak, F. Alayunt, C. Akdeniz, Z. Can, and U. Aksoy, “Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits during Transportation”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 180–193, 2010, doi: 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001137.
ISNAD
Çakmak, Bülent et al. “Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits During Transportation”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16/3 (September 2010), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001137.
JAMA
Çakmak B, Alayunt F, Akdeniz C, Can Z, Aksoy U. Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits during Transportation. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2010;16:180–193.
MLA
Çakmak, Bülent et al. “Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits During Transportation”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, 2010, pp. 180-93, doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001137.
Vancouver
Çakmak B, Alayunt F, Akdeniz C, Can Z, Aksoy U. Assessment of the Quality Losses of Fresh Fig Fruits during Transportation. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2010;16(3):180-93.