Ethephon Dozları ve Uygulama Zamanlarının Nohut Cicer arietinum L. ’ta Verim ve Verim Öğelerine Etkileri

Year 2009, Volume: 15 Issue: 04, 301 - 309, 01.11.2009

Mustafa Güler

https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001104

Abstract

Bu çalışma, 2006-2007 ve 2007-2008 yetiştirme dönemlerinde farklı doz ve zamanlarda uygulanan ethephonun nohutta verim ve verim öğelerine etkisini saptamak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Gökçe nohut çeşidinin materyal olarak kullanıldığı çalışmada, bitkilere üç yapraklı dönem, çiçeklenme öncesi ve tane doldurma olmak üzere üç farklı zamanda 0, 150, 300, 450 ve 600 g/ha dozlarında ethephon uygulanmıştır. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçlara göre; farklı doz ve zamanlarda ethephon uygulanan nohut bitkisinde ele alınan özellikler yönünden istatistiki önemli farklılıklar saptanmıştır. Ethephon uygulama zamanlarının tane verimine etkisi önemsiz olmakla birlikte, 450 g/ha ethephon dozundan en yüksek tane verimi elde edilmiştir. Ethephon uygulaması tane verimini oluşturan verim unsurlarının çoğuna olumlu etkide bulunmuş olup, genellikle çiçeklenme öncesi ethephon uygulamalarında en yüksek değerler belirlenmiştir

Keywords

Nohut, ethephon dozları, verim, verim öğeleri

Effects of Ethephon Doses and Application Times on Yield and Yield Components of Chickpea Cicer arietinum L.

Abstract

This study was conducted in the growing seasons of 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 to determine the effects of different ethephon doses and application times on yield and yield components of chickpea. Gökçe cultivar of chickpea was used as material in the study, and 0,150, 300, 450 and 600 g/ha ethephon doses were applied at the growth stages of three-leaves stage, before anthesis and grain filling period. Results of the study indicated that significant effects were determined with the application of different ethephon doses and application times in the traits of chickpea. The effect of ethephon application times on grain yield were nonsignificant, and the highest grain yield was obtained from the 450 g/ha ethephon dose. Ethephon application positively affected most of yield components in chickpea, and the greatest values were determined with the ethephon applications before anthesis

Keywords

Chickpea, ethephon doses, yield, yield components

References

• Abdul, K.S. and M.M. Said. 1985. Effect of cycocel and gibberellic acid on growth of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) seedling. Faba Bean Abstracts 5 (1):11.
• Abou-Elleil, G. and S.M. El-Wazeri. 1982. Significance of foliar application with certain growth substances for controlling shedding in field beans (Vicia faba L.). Field Crop Abstracts 35(7):617.
• Bangal, D.B., S.N. Deshmukh and V.A. Patil. 1984. Note on the effect of growth regulators and urea on yield and yield attributes of gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crop Abstracts 37(9):774.
• Beşer, E. 2000. Bakla (Vicia faba L.)’da değişik miktar ve zamanlarda verilen cycocelin verim ve verim öğelerine etkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Bora, R.K. and C.M. Sarma. 2006. Effect of gibberellic acid and cycocel on growth, yield and protein content of pea. Asian Journal of Plant Science 5:324-330.
• Bulman, P. and D.L. Smith. 1993. Yield and grain protein response of spring barley to ethephon and triadimefon. Crop Science 33(4):798-803.
• Chailakhyan, M.K. and S. Arutyunkan. 1970. Effect of chlormequat on the growth, nodulation and rhizosphere micro-organisms of leguminous plants. Field Crop Abstracts 23(1):65.
• Düzgüneş, O., T. Kesici, O. Kavuncu ve F. Gürbüz. 1987. Araştırma ve Deneme Metodları (İstatistik Metodları II). A.Ü. Ziraat Fak., Yayın No: 1021, Ankara.
• Eriş, A. 1991. Büyüme Düzenleyici Maddeler. Ders Notları (Basılmamış). Bursa.
• Eser, D. 1978. Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Ders Rotosu, 98 s., Ankara.
• Foster, K.R. and J.S. Taylor. 1993. Response of barley to ethephon-Effects of rate, nitrogen, and irrigation. Crop Science 33(1):123-131.
• Güler, M. 2008a. Ethephon uygulamasının tritikale çeşitlerinde verim ve verim unsurlarındaki etkilerinin belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 14(1): 22-28.
• Güler, M. 2008b. Ethephon’un tritikalede tane verimi, protein oranı ve protein verimine etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 14(2): 124-130.
• Hurduc, N., L. Parjol-Savllescu and G.F. Popa. 1985. Effect of applying CCC and Amchem 76 A 563 to beans. Field Crop Abstracts 38(11): 774.
• Joaquin, T.B.M., C. Trejo, A. Hernandez-Garay, P.J. Perez, S.D.G. Garcia and C.A.R. Quero. 2007. Effects of ethephon, salicylic acid and cidef-4 on yhe yield and quality of guinea grass seed. Tropical Grasslands 41(1):55-60.
• Lauer, J.G. 1991. Barley tiller response to plant density and ethephon. Agronomy Journal 83(6):968-973.
• Ma, B.L. and D.L. Smith. 1992. Chlormequat and ethephon timing and grain production of spring barley. Agronomy Journal 84(6):934-939.
• Ma, B.L., S. Leibovitch, W.E. Maloba and D.L. Smith. 1992. Spring barley responses to nitrogen fertilizerand ethephon in regions with a short crop growing season. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science-Zeitschrift für acker und Pflanzenbau 169(3)151-160.
• Moomaw, R.S. and G.W. Echtenkamp. 1991. Ethephon use on soybean cultivars to enhance establishment of underseeded cover crops. Journal of Production Agriculture 4(2):250-255.
• Peltonen-Sainio, P. and A. Rajala.2001. Chlormequat chloride and ethephon affect growth and yield formation of conventional, naked and dwarf oat. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 10(3):165-174.
• Shalaby, M.A.F. 2006. Effect of cycocel (2-chloroethyl trimethyl ammonium chloride) on vegetative growth, flowering and yield of some chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Annals of Agricultural Science 38(4): 2085-2104.
• Simmons, S.R., E.A. Oelke, J.V. Wiersma, W.E. Lueschen and D.D. Warnes. 1988. Spring wheat and barley responses to ethephon. Agronomy Journal 80:829-834.
• Suty, L. 1984. Growth regulators and potential of faba bean. Field Crop Abstracts 37(7): 592.
• Tripathi, S.C., K.D. Sayre and J.N. Kaul. 2003. Fibre analysis of wheat genotypes and its association with lodging: Effects of nitrogen levels and ethephon. Cereal Research Communications 31 (3-4):429-436.
• Tripathi, S.C., K.D. Sayre, J.N. Kaul and R.S. Narang. 2004. Lodging behavior and yield potential of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) effects of ethephon and genotypes. Field Crops Research 87 (2-3): 207-220.
• Wery, J. and P.Grinac. 1983. Uses of legumes and their economic importance. In: Technical handbook on symbiotic nitrogen fixation. FAO, Rome, Italy.