Zirkonya Esaslı Seramikler

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 15 - 18, 01.10.2012

Ömer Kırmalı Ali Kemal Özdemir

Öz

Zirkonyum oksit ile güçlendirilmiş seramikler, oksit seramikler içerisinde önemli bir yer tutar. Günümüzde yüksek dayanıklılık, biyouyumluluk, iyi kimyasal stabilite ve doğal görünüm özellikleri sayesinde ideal dental materyal olarak kabul edilmektedir. CAD/CAM teknoloji ile üretilirler ve üstün mekanik özellikleri nedenli arka grup dişlerin restore edilmesine olanak sağlarlar. Makalede zirkonyum seramiklerin yapısı, tipleri ve özelliklerinden bahsedilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Y-tzp zirkonyum, Seramik, Zirkonyum oksit

Zirconia-based Ceramics

Öz

Ceramics strengthened with zirconium oxide take a significant place among oxide ceramics. Nowadays, because of its high toughness, biocompatibility, good chemical stability and natural appearance properties zirconia ceramic is regarded as the ideal dental material. Zirconium oxide are produced by CAD/CAM technology and used to restore of posterior teeth because of their superior mechanical properties. In this article, the structure of zirconia ceramics, types and properties are described

Anahtar Kelimeler

Y-tzp zirconia, Ceramic, Zirconium oxide

Kaynakça

• 1. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 1-25.
• 2. Tosun T. Kuron ve köprü protezlerinde zirkonyum. 22.baskı. Dentalife 2007; 18-26.
• 3. Ardlin BI. Transformation-toughened zirconia for dental inlays, crown sandbridges: chemical stability and effect of low-temperature aging on flexural strength and surface structure. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 590-5.
• 4. Kelly JR, Denry I. Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 289-98.
• 5. Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: current thinking and trends. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 513-30.
• 6. Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina-advanced Technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999; 7: 113-9.
• 7. Meyenberg KH, Luthy H. Scharer P. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995; 7: 73-80.
• 8. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 4: 231-8.
• 9. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass-infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 441-8.
• 10. Luthy H, Loeffel O, Hammerle CH. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 195- 200.
• 11. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 426-33.
• 12. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 45-61.
• 13. Lin JD, Duh JG. Fracture toughness and hardness of ceria and yttria doped tetragonal zirconia ceramics. Mater Chem Phys 2002; 78: 253- 261.
• 14. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Quach L, Swain MV. Influence of grinding, sandblasting, polishing and heat treatment on the flexural strength of a glassinfiltrated alumina-reinforced dental ceramic. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2153-60.
• 15. Christel P, Meunier A, Heller M, Torre JP, Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989; 23: 45-61.
• 16. Sorensen J. The Lava systemfor CAD/CAM production of high-strength precision fixed prosthodontics. Quintessence Dent Technol 2004; 26: 57-67.
• 17. Chevalier J, Cales B, Drouin JM. Low temperature aging of Y- TZP ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1999; 82: 2150-2154.
• 18. Sundh A, Molin M, Sjogren G. Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconiaallceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 476-82.
• 19. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 322-6.
• 20. Covacci V, Bruzzese N, Maccauro G, Andreassi C, Ricci GA, Piconi C, Marmo E, Burger W, Cittadini A. In vitro evaluation of themutagenic and carcinogenic power of high purity zirconia ceramic. Biomaterials 1999; 20: 371-6.
• 21. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi A, Torricelli P. Bacterialcolonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 793-8.
• 22. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 520-5.
• 23. Moffa JP, Guckes AD, Okawa MT, Lilly GE. An evaluation of non precious alloys foruse with porcelain veneers. Part II. Industrial safety and biocompatibility. J Prosthet Dent 1973; 30: 432- 41.
• 24. Hansen PA, West LA. Allergic reaction following insertion of a Pd-Cu-Au fixed partial denture: a clinical report. J Prosthodont 1997; 6: 144-8.
• 25. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporaryall-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48: 531-44.
• 26. Chevalier J. What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials 2006; 27: 535-43.
• 27. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 599-604.
• 28. Akagawa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between free standing and toothconnected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: a clinical and histologic study. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 551-8.
• 29. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299- 307.
• 30. Jeong SM, Ludwig K, Kern, M. Investigation of the fracture resistance of three types of zirconia posts in all-ceramic post-and-corerestorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 154-8.
• 31. Heydecke G, Butz F, Hüssein A, Strub, JR. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 438-45.
• 32. Theunissen G, Bouma JS, Winnubst AJA, Burggraaf AJ. Mechanical properties of ultra-fine grained zirconia ceramics. J Mater Sci 1992; 27: 4429-4438.
• 33. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and Technologies fo rall-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92: 557-62.
• 34. Rimondini L, Cerroni L, Carrassi, A, Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surface: an in-vitro and in-vivo study. Internatıonal Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants 2002; 17: 793-798.
• 35. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporaryall-ceramic fixed partial dentures :a review. Dent Clin N Am 2004; 48: 531-544.
• 36. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 520-525.
• 37. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Swain MV, Ironside J.Mechanical properties of In-Ceram Alumina and In-CeramZirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 339-46.