Imagined families, contested childhoods: Doing gender as subversive deviances of children’s agency

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 45, 34 - 43, 30.06.2023

Ozan Can Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.33613/antropolojidergisi.1123573

Cited By: 1

Öz

Recent ethnographies of childhood have shown that the current politics of family and children led to new epistemological frameworks and intersectional methodologies. These scholarly works have broadened the scope of ethnographic inquiry beyond the household or caregiver level to encompass a wider socio-political and economic context. They consider the interruptions of state regulations and political economy on the welfare of children in examining the gendered parental practices of child-rearing. This critical review, first, seeks to explicate scholarly work on the intersectionality of gendered parenting and the embodiment of gender, which unveils the peculiarities and intricate nature of child-rearing practices in the Turkish context. Second, it distinguishes itself by drawing attention to children’s agency as a locus of deviation and resistance vis-à-vis the moralizing ideologies and regulative discourses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anthropology of childhood, child-rearing practices, children's agency, gendered parenting

Destekleyen Kurum

University of Vienna

Teşekkür

I want to express my sincere gratitude to my former supervisor, Dr. habil. Patricia Zuckerhut, for her invaluable guidance and unwavering support during my doctoral research. Her expertise and insights were crucial in shaping and navigating my future research.

Çocuk failliğinin bir direnişi olarak cinsiyetin ifadesi

Öz

Yakın zamanda yapılan çocukluk etnografileri, aile ve çocuklara ilişkin mevcut politikaların yeni epistemolojik çerçevelere ve kesişimsel metodolojilere yol açtığını göstermiştir. Son dönemdeki akademik çalışmalar, etnografik araştırmanın kapsamını ev içi veya ebeveynlik düzeyinin ötesine taşıyarak daha geniş bir sosyo-politik ve ekonomik bağlamda ele almaya başlamıştır. Bu yaklaşım, çocuk yetiştirmenin cinsiyetlendirilmiş ebeveyn pratiklerini incelerken, devlet düzenlemelerinin ve ahlakileştiren söylemlerin çocukluğun regüle edilişindeki etkilerini göz önünde bulundurmaktadır. Bu inceleme makalesi, Türkiye bağlamında çocuk yetiştirme pratiklerinin özelliklerini ve karmaşık doğasını ortaya çıkaran, cinsiyetlendirilmiş ebeveynlik ve toplumsal cinsiyetin somutlaştırılmasının kesişimselliği üzerine yapılan akademik çalışmaları incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın önemi, hegemonik ideolojiler ve düzenleyici söylemler karşısında bir sapma ve direniş noktası olarak çocukların failliğine yönelik yapmış olduğu vurgudur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çocuk antropolojisi, çocuk yetiştirme pratikleri, çocuk failliği, cinsiyetlendirilmiş ebeveynlik

Kaynakça

• Babül, E. (2015). The paradox of protection: Human rights, the masculinist State, and the moral economy of gratitude in Turkey. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12120
• Bolin, I. (2006). Growing up in a culture of respect: Child rearing in Highland Peru. The University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/709829
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.
• Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity, 15th edition. Routledge.
• Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203499627
• Brembeck, H., Johansson, B., & Kampman, J. (Eds). (2004). Beyond the competent child: Exploring contemporary childhoods in the Nordic welfare societies. Roskilde University Press.
• Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 71(3), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2004.0045
• Cavanaugh, J. R. (March 10, 2015). Performativity. Oxford Bibliographies in Anthropology. Retrieved May 4, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0114
• Cindoglu, D., & Unal, D. (2017). Gender and sexuality in the authoritarian discursive strategies of ‘New Turkey.’ European Journal of Women’s Studies, 24(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506816679003
• Clark, A. (2017). Listening to young children: A guide to understanding and using the Mosaic approach, Expanded third edition. National Children’s Bureau.
• Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities, Second edition. University of California Press/Polity Press.
• Deeb, L. (2006). An enchanted modern: Gender and public piety in Shi’i Lebanon. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840786
• Duranti, A. (2003). Language as culture in U.S. anthropology: Three paradigms. Current Anthropology, 44(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1086/368118
• Duranti, A. (Ed.) (2004). A companion to linguistic anthropology. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522
• Eriksen, T. H., & Nielsen, F. S. (2001). A history of anthropology. Pluto Press.
• Esser, F., Baader, M. S, Betz, T., & Hungerland, B. (Eds.) (2016). Reconceptualising agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722245
• Felluga, D. (January 31, 2011). Modules on Butler: On Performativity. Introductory Guide to Critical Theory. Purdue University. Received May 4, 2019 from https://www.cla.purdue.edu/academic/english/theory/genderandsex/modules/butlerperformativity.html
• Froerer, P. (2009). Ethnographies of childhood and child-rearing, Reviews in Anthropology, (38)1, 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00938150802672923
• Gallagher, L. A. (2015). Theorizing identities in early childhood. In A. Farrell, S. L. Kagan, & E. K. M. Tisdall (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Research (pp. 118–132). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473920859
• Gallagher, M. (2019). Rethinking children’s agency: Power, assemblages, freedom and materiality. Global Studies of Childhood 9(3), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860993
• Gaskins, S. (2008). Children’s daily lives among the Yucatec Maya. In R. A. LeVine, & R. S. New (Eds.), Anthropology and child development: A cross-cultural reader (pp. 280–288). Wiley-Blackwell.
• Hirschfeld, A. L. (2002). Why do not anthropologists like children? American Anthropologist, 104(2), 611-627. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.2.611
• Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment essays on livelihood. Routledge.
• Kocamaner, H. (2017). Strengthening the family through television: Islamic broadcasting, secularism and the politics of responsibility in Turkey. Anthropological Quarterly, 90(3), 675-714. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2017.0040
• Kocamaner, H. (2019). Regulating the family through religion. American Ethnologist, 46(4), 495–508. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2017.0040
• Korkut, U., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2017). Politics and gender identity in Turkey: Centralised Islam for socio-economic control. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315405384
• Kosminsky, E., & Daniel, L. (2005). Toys and games: Childhood in the Parque des Naçöes Favela in Brazil. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1537-4661(04)10003-2
• Kotz, L. (1992). The body you want: An interview with Judith Butler. Artforum, 31(3), 82–89. https://www.artforum.com/print/199209/the-body-you-want-an-inteview-with-judith-butler-33505
• Kroløkke, C., & Sørensen, A. S. (2006). Gender communication theories and analyses: From silence to performance. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452233086
• Kusserow, A. (2004). American individualism: Child rearing and social class in three neighborhoods. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Lancy, D. F. (2008). Recent developments in the anthropology of childhood. Anthropology News, 49(4), 9-9. https://doi.org/10.1525/an.2008.49.4.9
• Lancy, D. F. (2012). Why anthropology of childhood? A brief history of an emerging discipline. AnthropoChildren, 1(1), 1-17. https://popups.uliege.be/2034-8517/index.php?id=918
• Lancy, D. F., Bock, J., & Gaskins, S. (Eds.) (2010). The anthropology of learning in childhood. AltaMira Press.
• Leonard, M. (2016) The sociology of children, childhood and generation. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714494
• LeVine, R. A. (2007). Ethnographic studies of childhood: A historical overview. American Anthropologist, 109(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.247
• Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as method: The imaginary reconstitution of society. Palgrave Macmillan
• Lewellen, T. C. (2002). The Anthropology of globalization: Cultural anthropology enters the 21st century. Bergin & Garvey.
• Marchand, T. H. J. (Ed.) (2010). Making knowledge. Explorations of the indissoluble relation between mind, body, and environment. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444391473
• Moss, P., & Petrie, P. (2002). From children’s services to children’s spaces. Routledge Falmer.
• McCarthy, J. R., Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2003). Making families: Moral tales of parenting and step-parenting. Routledge.
• Montgomery, H. (2009). An Introduction to childhood. Anthropological perspectives on children’s lives. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Morton, H. (1996). Becoming Tongan: An ethnography of childhood. The University of Hawaii Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824840495
• Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2002). Faces of the state: Secularism and public life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214283
• Nolas, S.-M., Aruldoss, V., & Varvantakis, C. (2018). Learning to listen: Exploring the idioms of childhood. Sociological Research Online, 24(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418811972
• Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2002). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041592
• Ortner, S. B. (2006). Anthropology and social theory: Culture, power, and the acting subject. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388456
• Özbay, C., & Öktem, K. (2021). Turkey’s queer times. New Perspectives on Turkey, 64, 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2021.4
• Özyürek, E. (2006). Nostalgia for the modern: State secularism and everyday politics in Turkey. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388463
• Pamuk, O. (2004). Istanbul: Memories and the city. Vintage International.
• Prout, A. (Ed.). (2004). The Future of Childhood (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203323113
• Punch, S. (2016) Exploring children’s agency across majority and minority world contexts. In F. Esser, M. S., Baader, T. Betz, & B. Hungerland (Eds.), Reconceptualizing agency and childhood: New perspectives in childhood studies (pp. 183–196). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722245
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
• Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.) Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157-210). Monthly Review Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/RUBTTI
• Rydstrom, H. (2006). Masculinity and punishment: Men’s upbringing of boys in rural Vietnam. Childhood, 13(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568206066355
• Sirman, N. (2005). The making of familial citizenship in Turkey. In E. F. Keyman, & A. İçduygu (Eds.), Citizenship in a global world: European questions and Turkish experiences (pp. 147–172). Routledge.
• Scott, J. W. (1996). Feminism & history. Oxford University Press.
• Stacey, J., & Biblarz, T. (2001). (How) Does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review, 66(2), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657413
• Spyrou, S. (2018). Disclosing childhoods: Research and knowledge production for critical childhood studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47904-4
• Spyrou, S. (2019). An ontological turn for schildhood studies? Children & Society, 33(4), 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12292
• Stryker, R., Boddy, J., Bragg, S., & Sim-Schouten, W. (2019), The future of childhood studies and Children & Society. Children & Society, 33(4), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12345
• Stafford, C. (1995). The roads of Chinese childhood: Learning and identification in Angang. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586347
• Sultan, A., & Andresen, S. (2019). ‘A child on drugs’: Conceptualising childhood experiences of agency and vulnerability. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860996
• Sutterlüty, F., & Tisdall, E. K. M. (2019). Agency, autonomy, and self-determination: Questioning key concepts of childhood studies. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860992
• Thelen, T., & Haukanes, H. (2010). Parenting after the Century of the child: Travelling ideals, institutional negotiations, and individual responses. Routledge.
• Trawick, M. (2007). Enemy lines: Warfare, childhood, and play in Batticaloa. The University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520938878
• Weisner, T. S. (2015). Childhood: Anthropological aspects. In: J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edition (pp. 451–458). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12032-X
• White, J. (2002). Islamist mobilization in Turkey: A study in vernacular politics. The University of Washington Press.
• Yazıcı, B. (2012). The Return to the family: Welfare, state, and politics of the family in Turkey. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(1), 103–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0013
• Yilmaz, Z. (2015). “Strengthening the family” policies in Turkey: Managing the social question and armoring conservative–neoliberal populism. Turkish Studies, 16(3), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2015.1067863