SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES-BASED ACTIVITY: SSI TOMBOLA

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to contribute to the field by giving the activity example steps of developed for teaching socioscientific issues (SSIs) that increasingly important issues in science education in recent years. Accordingly, an activity that includes dimensions of science-technolgy-society-environment (STSE) is designed about SSIs. This activity, which is thought to be a guiding material for teachers, will help their lessons.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Socioscientific issues,pre-service science teachers,activity

SOSYOBİLİMSEL KONULAR TEMELLİ BİR ETKİNLİK ÖRNEĞİ: SBK TOMBALA

Öz

Bu çalışmada son yıllarda fen eğitiminde önemi gittikçe artan sosyobilimsel konuların (SBKlar) öğretimine yönelik geliştirilen bir etkinlik örneğinin basamakları verilerek, alana katkı sağlamak amaçlanmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda fen-teknoloji-toplum-çevre (FTTÇ) hareketinin beraberinde getirdiği SBKlarla ilgili, FTTÇnin boyutlarını içeren bir etkinlik tasarlanmıştır. Öğretmenlere yol gösterici nitelikte bir materyal olduğu düşünülen bu etkinliğin alana ve öğretmenlerin derslerine yardımcı olacağı düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sosyobilimsel konular,fen bilgisi öğretmen adayları,etkinlik

Kaynakça

1. Acar, O., Türkmen, L. & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student Difficulties in socio-scientific argumentaation and decision-making research findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 9, 1191-1206.
2. Dawson, V. & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31, 11, 1421-1445. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
3. Ekborg, M., Ottander, C., Silfver, E. & Simon, S. (2013). Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues: A large scale and in depth study. Research Science Education, 43, 599–617.
4. Fensham, P. J. (1988). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 346-356.
5. Gresch, H., Hasselhorn, M. & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Training in decision-making strategies: An approach to enhance students’ competence to deal with socio-scientific issues, International Journal of Science Education, 35, 15, 2587-2607.
6. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı (MEB). (2013). İlköğretim Kurumları Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
7. Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues-based approach. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 174-181.
8. Sadler, T. D. & Zeidler D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 1, 112-138.

9. Topçu, M. S. (2015). Sosyobilimsel Konular ve Öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
10. Venville, G. J. & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 8, 952-977.
11. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D, Simmons, M. & Howes, E. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 3, 357-377.