Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study

Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1 11 Eylül 2006
  • Mehmet Asik
  • Nadir Sener
  • Hayati Durmaz
  • Mehmet Kocaoglu
  • Alp Goksan
PDF İndir
EN TR

Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study

Öz

The importance of menisci to the knee has become more clearly delineated in recent years by biomechanical studies and by long term follow up of meniscectomy cases. Functional significance of the menisci has led to a more conservative therapeutic approach to lesions of the meniscus and furthermore lots of open and arthroscopic suturing techniques have been identified. The aim of this study was to measure and compare the primary stability of five different meniscal suturing techniques. The techniques investigated were horizontal mattress, vertical mattress, knot-end, vertical, vertical loop. Twenty bovine medial menisci were cut to simulate peripheral longitudinal tears. The menisci were then repaired with one of the five sutures. Then the two parts of the meniscus were pulled using the Instron Tensometer until failure occurred. Knot-end techniques gave inferior results (tearing stress 64±5 N) compared with other techniques. Vertical mattress failed at 130±3 N, vertical loop failed at 128±4.5 N, horizontal mattress failed at 98±5 N. This study showed the superior mechanical characteristic of the vertical stitching technique (tearing stress 136±2.7 N) over the other technique tested.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

Mehmet Asik Bu kişi benim

Nadir Sener Bu kişi benim

Hayati Durmaz Bu kişi benim

Mehmet Kocaoglu Bu kişi benim

Alp Goksan Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Eylül 2006

Gönderilme Tarihi

6 Mart 2014

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1996 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Asik, M., Sener, N., Durmaz, H., Kocaoglu, M., & Goksan, A. (2006). Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 30(1), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152
AMA
1.Asik M, Sener N, Durmaz H, Kocaoglu M, Goksan A. Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;30(1):62-66. doi:10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152
Chicago
Asik, Mehmet, Nadir Sener, Hayati Durmaz, Mehmet Kocaoglu, ve Alp Goksan. 2006. “Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 30 (1): 62-66. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152.
EndNote
Asik M, Sener N, Durmaz H, Kocaoglu M, Goksan A (01 Eylül 2006) Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 30 1 62–66.
IEEE
[1]M. Asik, N. Sener, H. Durmaz, M. Kocaoglu, ve A. Goksan, “Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, c. 30, sy 1, ss. 62–66, Eyl. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152.
ISNAD
Asik, Mehmet - Sener, Nadir - Durmaz, Hayati - Kocaoglu, Mehmet - Goksan, Alp. “Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 30/1 (01 Eylül 2006): 62-66. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152.
JAMA
1.Asik M, Sener N, Durmaz H, Kocaoglu M, Goksan A. Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;30:62–66.
MLA
Asik, Mehmet, vd. “Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, c. 30, sy 1, Eylül 2006, ss. 62-66, doi:10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Asik, Nadir Sener, Hayati Durmaz, Mehmet Kocaoglu, Alp Goksan. Primary stabilities of different meniscus suture techniques: A comparative biomechanical study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 01 Eylül 2006;30(1):62-6. doi:10.3944/aott.v30i1.4152