Effects of two different continuous passive motion application protocols on the functional activities of total knee arthroplasty inpatients

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different continuous passive motion (CPM) application protocols (low- and high-angle) on the early phase functional activities of total knee arthroplasty inpatients.
Methods: The study included 170 patients who underwent primary TKA. While 84 of the TKA patients underwent low-angle CPM application, 86 of the patients underwent high-angle CPM application. The patients’ functional activities were compared using the Iowa Level of Assistance Scale (ILAS), gait speeds using the Iowa Ambulation Velocity Scale (IAVS), knee scores using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score, and the duration of hospital stays with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) preoperatively and on postoperative Day 2, Day 6, and at discharge.
Results: It was found that patients in the high-angle group had lower pain levels than did the patients in the low-angle group postsurgery (p<0.05). Patients in the high-angle group achieved their functional activities more independently on postoperative Day 2, Day 6, and at discharge than did the patients in the low-angle group (p<0.05). However, gait speed of patients in the former group was lower than that of the patients in the latter group (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Although low-angle CPM application produced better results in terms of gait speed following TKA, the high-angle CPM application was superior in terms of independence levels of functional activities in the early postsurgery period. This result suggests that the appropriate use of rehabilitation methods such as CPM applications may guide clinicians to increase patients’ level of independence.

Keywords

• Total knee arthroplasy; continous passive motion; functional activity; gait speed.

Kaynakça

1. Herbold JA, Bonistall K, Blackburn M, Agolli J, Gaston S, Gross C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the ef- fectiveness of continuous passive motion after total knee replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:1240–5.
2. Leitch KK, Dalgorf D, Borkhoff CM, Kreder HJ. Bilateral total knee arthroplasty--staged or simultaneous? Ontario’s orthopedic surgeons reply. Can J Surg 2005;48:273–6.
3. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Suarez-Alma ME. Determi- nants of function after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2003;83:696–706.
4. Shields RK, Leo KC, Miller B, Dostal WF, Barr R. An acute care physical therapy clinical practice database for outcomes research. Phys Ther 1994;74:463–70.
5. Bakırhan S, Angın S, Karatosun V, Ünver B, Günal I. Physical performance parameters during standing up in patients with unilateral and bilateral total knee arthro- plasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012;46:367–72.
6. Ersözlü S, Sahin O, Ozgür AF, Tuncay IC. The effects of two different continuous passive motion protocols on knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: a prospec- tive analysis. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2009;43:412–8.
7. Beaupré LA, Davies DM, Jones CA, Cinats JG. Exercise combined with continuous passive motion or slider board therapy compared with exercise only: a randomized con- trolled trial of patients following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2001;81:1029–37.
8. Denis M, Moffet H, Caron F, Ouellet D, Paquet J, Nolet L. Effectiveness of continuous passive motion and conven- tional physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty: a ran- domized clinical trial. Phys Ther 2006;86:174–85.

9. Mau-Moeller A, Behrens M, Finze S, Bruhn S, Bader R, Mittelmeier W. The effect of continuous passive motion and sling exercise training on clinical and functional out- comes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized ac- tive-controlled clinical study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2014;12:68.
10. Unver B, Karatosun V, Bakirhan S. ABility to rise inde- pendently from a chair during 6-month follow-up after unilateral and bilateral total knee replacement. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:385–7.
11. Herbold JA, Bonistall K, Blackburn M. Effectiveness of continuous passive motion in an inpatient rehabilitation hospital after total knee replacement: a matched cohort study. PM R 2012;4:719–25.
12. Mahoney OM, McClung CD, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP. The effect of total knee arthroplasty design on extensor mechanism function. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:416–21.
13. Unver B, Karatosun V, Bakirhan S. Evaluation of early stage postoperative functional levels of geriatric patients with total knee replacement. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2006;9:19–24.
14. MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW, Kramer J, Vaz M. Prospective randomized clinical trial of continuous passive motion after total knee arthro- plasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;380:30–5.
15. Bennett LA, Brearley SC, Hart JA, Bailey MJ. A compari- son of 2 continuous passive motion protocols after total knee arthroplasty: a controlled and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:225–33.
16. Bruun-Olsen V, Heiberg KE, Mengshoel AM. Continuous passive motion as an adjunct to active exercises in early re- habilitation following total knee arthroplasty - a random- ized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:277–83.
17. Graham JE, Granger CV, Karmarkar AM, Deutsch A, Niewczyk P, Divita MA, et al. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of follow-up informa- tion on patients discharged from inpatient rehabilita- tion programs in 2002-2010. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014;93:231–44.
18. Granger CV, Markello SJ, Graham JE, Deutsch A, Re- istetter TA, Ottenbacher KJ. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with lower limb joint replacement discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2000-2007. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010;89:781–94.
19. Powell RS, Pulido P, Tuason MS, Colwell CW Jr, Ez- zet KA. Bilateral vs unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a patient-based comparison of pain levels and recovery of ambulatory skills. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:642–9.
20. Kumar PJ, McPherson EJ, Dorr LD, Wan Z, Baldwin K. Rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: a compari- son of 2 rehabilitation techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;331:93–101.
21. Lau SK, Chiu KY. Use of continuous passive motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:336–9.
22. Alkire MR, Swank ML. Use of inpatient continuous pas- sive motion versus no CPM in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Nurs 2010;29:36–40.
23. Lenssen TA, van Steyn MJ, Crijns YH, Waltjé EM, Roox GM, Geesink RJ, et al. Effectiveness of prolonged use of continuous passive motion (CPM), as an adjunct to phys- iotherapy, after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoske- let Disord 2008;9:60.
24. Akarcalı I, Tugay N, Erden Z, Tokgözoğlu M, Atilla B, Alpaslan M. Results of an accelerated CPM protocol in the rehabilitation of patients with total knee arthroplasty. Hacettepe Ortopedi Dergisi 2001;11:20–3.
25. Baliunas AJ, Hurwitz DE, Ryals AB, Karrar A, Case JP, Block JA, et al. Increased knee joint loads during walking are present in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoar- thritis Cartilage 2002;10:573–9.
26. Walsh M, Woodhouse LJ, Thomas SG, Finch E. Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with con- trol subjects. Phys Ther 1998;78:248–58.
27. LaStayo PC, Meier W, Marcus RL, Mizner R, Dibble L, Peters C. Reversing muscle and mobility deficits 1 to 4 years after TKA: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1493–500.