Korakoid ve lateral sagital infraklavikular blokların karşılaştırması

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1, 32 - 37, 05.04.2013

Sertan Acar Yavuz Gurkan Mine Solak Kamil Toker

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı korakoid blok (coracoid block, CB) ve lateral sagital infraklavikular blok (lateral sagittal infraclavicular block, LSIB) tekniklerinde blok uygulama sürelerini karşılaştırmak ve CB ile LSIB'in başarı oranlarını karşılaştırmaktı.
Çalışma planı: Prospektif çalışma yöntemiyle; üst ekstremite ameliyatı tarihi verilen 100 yetişkin hasta rastgele bir biçimde CB ya da LSIB gruplarına ayrıldı. 5 mg/ml oranında 20 ml levobupivakain ve 20 mg/ml oranında 20 ml lidokain ile 5 µg/ml epinefrin içeren lokal anestezik karışımı (toplamı 40 ml); medyan, ulnar ya da radyal sinir tipi yanıtlardan biri alındıktan sonra uygulandı. Duyusal blok 40 dakika boyunca 10 dakikalık aralıklarla test edildi.
Bulgular: Blok uygulama süreleri (CB Grubu: 5.2±1.9 dk, LSIB Grubu: 5.5±1.4 dk) ve blok başarı oranları (CB Grubu: %86, LSIB Grubu: %92) her iki grupta da benzerlik göstermekteydi. LSIB grubunda ulnar sinir duyusal blok 10, 20 ve 30. dakikalarda, radyal sinir ise 20. dakikada CB’den anlamlı şekilde daha yoğundu (p<0.05). LSIB grubunda dört adet vasküler ponksiyon saptandı.
Çıkarımlar: Her iki tekniğin de klinik anlamda etkili olduğu ve benzer sürelerde uygulandığı görüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Korakoid blok; lateral sagital infraklavikular blok; sinir uyarımı.

Coracoid versus lateral sagittal infraclavicular block

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare block performance time and secondarily success rates of coracoid block (CB) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular block (LSIB).
Methods: This prospective study included 100 adult patients scheduled for upper limb surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a CB or LSIB. A local anesthetic mixture of 20 ml of levobupivacaine 5 mg/ml and 20 ml of lidocaine 20 mg/ml with 5 μg/ml epinephrine (total 40 ml) was administered after obtaining either a median, ulnar or radial nerve type response. Sensory block was tested at 10-minute intervals for 40 min.
Results: Block performance time (CB Group: 5.2±1.9 min, LSIB Group: 5.5±1.4 min) and block success rate (CB Group: 86%, LSIB Group: 92%) were similar in both groups. In the LSIB group, sensory block of the ulnar nerve at 10, 20 and 30 minutes and at the radial nerve at 20 minutes was significantly more intense than the CB group (p<0.05). There were four vascular punctures in the LSIB group.
Conclusion: Both block techniques were effective and performed in a similar time period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Coracoid block, lateral sagittal infraclavicular block, nerve stimulation

Kaynakça

• Raj PP, Montgomery SJ, Nettles D, Jenkins MT. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block – a new approach. Anesth Analg 1973;52:897-904.
• Whiffler K. Coracoid block – a safe and easy technique. Br J Anaesth 1981;53:845-8.
• Kilka HG, Geiger P, Mehrkens HH. Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade. A new method for anesthesia of the upper extremity. An anatomical and clinical study [Article in German] Anaesthesist 1995;44:339-44.
• Klaastad Ø, Smith HJ, Smedby O, Winther-Larsen EH, Breivik H, Fosse ET. A novel infraclavicular brachial plexus block: the lateral and sagittal technique, developed by magnetic resonance imaging studies. Anesth Analg 2004;98:252
• Wilson JL, Brown DL, Wong GY, Ehman RL, Cahill DR. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique. Anesth Analg 1998;87:870-3.
• Sauter AR, Dodgson MS, Stubhaug A, Halstensen AM, Klaastad Ø. Electrical nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance for lateral sagittal infraclavicular blocks: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, comparative study. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1910-5.
• Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Rasmussen H, Hesselbjerg L, Gürkan Y, Belhage B. Clinical evaluation of the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block developed by MRI studies. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005;30:329-34.
• Klaastad O, Dodgson MS, Stubhaug A, Sauter AR. Lateral sagittal infraclavicular block (LSIB). Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:86.
• Gürkan Y, Hoflten T, Solak M, Toker K. Lateral sagittal infraclavicular block: clinical experience in 380 patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:262-6.
• Gürkan Y, Acar S, Solak M, Toker K. Comparison of nerve stimulation vs. ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:851-5.
• Gürkan Y, Tekin M, Acar S, Solak M, Toker K. Is nerve stimulation needed during an ultrasound-guided lateral sagittal infraclavicular block? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54:403-7.
• AkyÈldÈz E, Gürkan Y, Ca¤layan C, Solak M, Toker K. Single vs. double stimulation during a lateral sagittal infraclavicular block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:1262-7.
• Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Infraclavicular perineural local anesthetic infusion: a comparison of three dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 2004;100:395-402.
• Sauter AR, Smith HJ, Stubhaug A, Dodgson MS, Klaastad Ø. Use of magnetic resonance imaging to define the anatomical location closest to all three cords of the infraclavicular brachial plexus. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1574-6.
• Rodríguez J, Taboada M, Oliveira J, Ulloa B, Bárcena M, Alvarez J. Single stimulation of the posterior cord is superior to dual nerve stimulation in a coracoid block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2010;54:241-5.
• Desroches J. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observational study of 150 patients. Can J Anesth 2003;50:253-7.
• Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Rotbİll Nielsen P, Risby Mortensen C. A comparison of coracoid and axillary approaches to the brachial plexus. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:274-9.
• Minville V, Asehnoune K, Chassery C, N'Guyen L, Gris C, Fourcade O, et al. Resident versus staff anesthesiologist performance: coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using a double-stimulation technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2005;30:233-7.
• Gaertner E, Estebe JP, Zamfir A, Cuby C, Macaire P. Infraclavicular plexus block: multiple injection versus single injection. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002;27:590-4.
• Deleuze A, Gentili ME, Marret E, Lamonerie L, Bonnet F. A comparison of a single-stimulation lateral infraclavicular plexus block with a triple-stimulation axillary block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:89-94.
• Minville V, Amathieu R, Luc N, Gris C, Fourcade O, Samii K, et al. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block versus humeral approach: comparison of anesthetic time and efficacy. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1198-201.
• Minville V, Fourcade O, Bourdet B, Doherty M, Chassery C, Pourrut JC, et al. The optimal motor response for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2007;104:448-51.
• Moayeri N, Renes S, van Geffen GJ, Groen GJ. Vertical infraclavicular brachial plexus block: needle redirection after elicitation of elbow flexion. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34: 236Bloc S, Garnier T, Komly B, Leclerc P, Mercadal L, Morel B, et al. Single-stimulation, low-volume infraclavicular plexus block: influence of the evoked distal motor response on success rate. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2006;31:433-7.
• Rodríguez J, Bárcena M, Taboada- Muñiz M, Lagunilla J, Alvarez J. A comparison of single versus multiple injections on the extent of anesthesia with coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1225-30.