Experimental analysis of water evaporation rates: influence of fan configuration on evaporation efficiency

Öz

This study experimentally investigates the effect of fan configuration and air velocity on evaporation rates. Four different fan configurations were tested under controlled experimental conditions: central opposite blowing, one-sided blowing, top blowing, and strong fan blowing from the short side. The results indicate that opposite blowing significantly enhances evaporation, while one-sided blowing has limited effectiveness due to reduced air-water contact. Top blowing and the use of strong fans also notably increase evaporation rates. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing water management practices and contribute to strategies aimed at reducing water losses.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Evaporation
• wind
• water management
• water use

Su buharlaşma oranlarının deneysel analizi: fan konfigürasyonunun buharlaşma miktarına etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, fan konumlandırmasının ve hava hızının su buharlaşma hızları üzerindeki etkisini deneysel olarak incelemektedir. Kontrollü deneysel koşullarda yapılan çalışmada dört farklı fan konfigürasyonu test edilmiştir: merkezden karşılıklı üfleme, tek taraflı üfleme, üstten üfleme ve kısa kenardan güçlü fan üflemesidir. Sonuçlar, karşılıklı üflemenin buharlaşmayı önemli ölçüde artırdığını, tek taraflı üflemenin ise hava-su temasının azalması nedeniyle sınırlı etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Üstten üfleme ve güçlü fan kullanımının ise belirgin bir şekilde buharlaşma hızlarını artırdığı görülmüştür. Bu bulgular, su yönetim uygulamalarını optimize etmek için değerli içgörüler sunmakta ve su kayıplarını azaltma stratejilerine katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Buharlaşma
• rüzgar
• su yönetimi
• su kullanımı

Kaynakça

1. Abbas SA, Xuan Y, Bailey RT (2022) Assessing climate change ımpact on water resources in water demand scenarios using SWAT-MODFLOW-WEAP. Hydrology, 9 (10).
2. Allawi MF, Ahmed ML, Aidan IA, Deo RC, El-Shafie A (2021) Developing reservoir evaporation predictive model for successful dam management. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(2): 499–514.
3. Azarkish H, Behzadmehr A, Fanaei Sheikholeslami T, Sarvari SMH, Fréchette LG (2015) Water evaporation phenomena on micro and nanostructured surfaces. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 90: 112–121.
4. Ben Neriah A, Assouline S, Shavit U, Weisbrod N (2014) Impact of ambient conditions on evaporation from porous media. Water Resources Research, 50(8): 6696–6712.
5. Fu G, Liu C, Chen S, Hong J (2004) Investigating the conversion coefficients for free water surface evaporation of different evaporation pans. Hydrological Processes, 18(12): 2247–2262.
6. Gao W, Liu X, Zheng C, Lu Y, He J, He Y (2023) Comparison of the soil water, vapor, and heat dynamics between summer maize and bare fields in arid and semi-arid areas. Agronomy, 13(4).
7. Hulsman P, Keune J, Koppa A, Schellekens J, Miralles DG (2023) Incorporating plant access to groundwater in existing global, satellite-based evaporation estimates. Water Resources Research, 59(8). Incropera FP, DeWitt DP (2002) Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. (6th ed.)., John Wiley & Sons.
8. Izady A, Sanikhani H, Abdalla O, Chen M, Kisi O (2017) Impurity effect on clear water evaporation: toward modelling wastewater evaporation using ANN, ANFIS-SC and GEP techniques. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62(11): 1856–1866.

9. Li Y, Huo S, Guo J, Sun J, Pan J, Wang D, Tan Q, Pei B (2023) Using hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes to estimate soil water evaporation loss under continuous evaporation conditions. Hydrological Processes, 37(5).
10. Masoner JR, Stannard DI, Christenson SC (2008) Differences in evaporation between a floating pan and class a pan on land. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44 (3): 552–561.
11. Putnam SA, Briones AM, Byrd LW, Ervin JS, Hanchak MS, White A, Jones JG (2012) Microdroplet evaporation on superheated surfaces. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 55(21–22): 5793–5807.
12. Szilagyi J, Jozsa J (2008) New findings about the complementary relationship-based evaporation estimation methods. Journal of Hydrology, 354(1–4): 171–186.
13. Tian W, Liu X, Wang K, Bai P, Liu C, Liang X (2022) Estimation of global reservoir evaporation losses. Journal of Hydrology, 607.
14. Tu Z, Yang Y (2022) On the estimation of potential evaporation under wet and dry conditions. Water Resources Research, 58(4).
15. Wang X, Liu L (2023) The impacts of climate change on the hydrological cycle and water resource management. In Water (Switzerland)i 15 (13).
16. Wurbs RA, Ayala RA (2014) Reservoir evaporation in Texas, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 510: 1–9.
17. Yu TF, Si JH, Feng Q, Xi HY, Chu YW, Li K (2017) Simulation of pan evaporation and application to estimate the evaporation of Juyan Lake, northwest China under a hyper-arid climate. Water (Switzerland), 9(12).