Evaluation of seating areas in Ankara Kuğulu Park in terms of usage

Öz

Open-green spaces, which have many benefits in terms of environmental, social, economic and human health, are public spaces that allow different people to spend time together. Urban parks are open green areas where people spend most of their time to meet their recreational needs in urban environments. Urban parks provide spaces where individuals can get away from city life, relax, socialize, and integrate with nature, create environments where urbanites can meet their psychological, social and physical needs. The sitting activity in the park areas and the places with different characteristics where they will perform this activity are the most used places. Within the scope of this study, the use of seating areas in Kuğulu Park, which has become the symbol of Ankara, which seating areas are preferred and for what reason, whether the personal characteristics of the users and the way they come individually or collectively are effective on the preferences. This study emphasizes that many factors should be taken into consideration in the design process of outdoor seating areas. As a result of the study, it was revealed that areas with high visual dominance, quiet, calm and where people can see easily without being seen are preferred for sitting activities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kuğulu park
• City park
• Sitting area
• Preference
• Appreciation

Ankara Kuğulu Park’taki oturma alanlarının kullanım açısından değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Çevresel, sosyal, ekonomik ve insan sağlığı açısından birçok faydası olan açık-yeşil alanlar, farklı insanların bir arada zaman geçirmelerine olanak sağlayan kamusal alanlardır. Kent ortamında halkın rekreasyonel gereksinimlerini karşılamak için en çok zaman geçirdikleri açık yeşil alanlar kent parklarıdır. Kent parkları bireylerin şehir yaşamından uzaklaşıp dinlenebileceği, sosyalleşebileceği, doğa ile bütünleşebileceği mekânlar sunar ve kentlinin psikolojik, sosyal ve fiziksel ihtiyaçlarını karşılayabileceği ortamlar oluşturur. Park alanları içerisindeki oturma aktivitesi ve bu aktiviteyi gerçekleştirecekleri farklı karakter özelliğine sahip mekanlar en çok kullanılan mekanlardır. Bu çalışma kapsamında Ankara’nın sembolü haline gelmiş Kuğulu Park’ daki oturma alanlarının kullanımı, hangi oturma alanlarının ne sebeple tercih edildiği, kullanıcıların kişisel özelliklerinin ve bireysel ya da toplu geliş şeklinin tercihler üzerinde etkili olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Bu çalışma ile dış mekandaki oturma alanlarının tasarım sürecinde birçok faktörün dikkate alınması gerektiği vurgulanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda görsel hakimiyeti yüksek, sessiz sakin ve görünmeden rahatça görebildikleri alanların oturma etkinliği için tercih edildiği ortaya çıkmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kuğulu park
• Kent parkı
• Oturma alanı
• Tercih
• Beğeni

Kaynakça

1. Abu-Ghazzeh TM (1999) Housing layout, social ınteraction, and the place of contact in Abu-Nuseir, Jordan. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19:41-73.
2. Appleton J (1975) The Experience of Landscape. John Wiley& Sons Inc., 308 pp.
3. Cattell V, Dines N, Gesler W, Curtis S (2008) Mingling, observing, and lingering: everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place, 14: 544-561.
4. Chang HY (2002) Human behavior patterns in office building plaza: three case studies in Downtown Dallas. The University of Texas Arlington Master Thesis.
5. Chen Y, Liu T, Liu W (2016) Increasing the use of large-scale public open spaces: a case study of the North Central Axis Square in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 53: 66-77.
6. Cooper Marcus C, Francis C (1998) People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, Second Edition, Wiley, 384 pp., New York.
7. Crankshaw N (2009) Creating Vibrant Public Spaces: Streetscape Design in Commercial and Historic Districts. Island Press, 240 pp., Washington.
8. Farida F (2013) Effects of outdoor shared spaces on social interaction in a housing estate in Algeria. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2: 457-467.

9. Francis M (2003) Urban Open Space; Designing for User Needs. Landscape Architecture Foundation, Island Press, 96 pp., Washington.
10. Gehl J (1987) Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 216.
11. Gehl J (2010) Cities for people. Island Press, 269 pp., Washington.
12. Gehl J (2011) Three Types of Outdoor Activities, Life Between Buildings, and Outdoor Activities and the Quality of Outdoor Space: from Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (1987). In The City Reader (pp. 586-608), Routledge.
13. Gehl J, Svarre B (2013) How to Study Public Life. Island Press, 200 pp., Washington, DC.
14. Gürer N, Uğurlar A (2017) Kent parklarında kullanıcı memnuniyeti: Ankara Kuğulu Park Örneği. Megaron, 12(3):443-459.
15. Hadavi S, Kaplan R, Hunter MCR (2015) Environmental affordances: a practical approach for design of nearby outdoor settings in urban residential areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134:19-32.
16. Huang SCL (2006) A study of outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 193-204.
17. Israel BA, Schul AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB (1998) Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1): 173-202.
18. Jalaladdini S, Oktay D (2012) Urban public spaces and vitality: a socio-spatial analysis in the streets of Cypriot Towns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35: 664-674.
19. Main B, Hannah GG (2010) Site furnishings: a complete guide to the planning, selection and use of landscape furniture and amenities. John Wiley & Sons.
20. Lai D, Zhoua C, Huang J, Jiang Y, Longa Z, Chena Q (2014) Outdoor space quality: a field study in an urban residential community in central China. Energy and Buildings, 68:713-720.
21. Lyle JT (1970) People watching in parks; a report from France and California. Landscape Architecture, 52:31-51.
22. Mumcu S, Düzenli T, Özbilen A (2010) Prospect and refuge as the predictors of preferences for seating areas. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(11):1223-1233.
23. Mumcu S, Yilmaz S (2016) Seating furniture in open spaces and their contribution to the social life. Environmental Sustainability and Landscape Management, 169.
24. Mumcu S, Yılmaz S, Düzenli T (2017) Açık mekanlardaki oturma donatılarının ve yerlerinin tasarımına ilişkin faktörler. İnönü Üniversitesi Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 7(15):1-16.
25. Nasution AD, Zahrah W (2012) Public open space privatization and quality of life, Case Study Merdeka Square Medan. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36:466-475.
26. Project for Public Spaces (2000) How to Turn a Place Around: A Handbook for Creating Successful Public Places. Project for Public Spaces Inc., 125pp. New York.
27. Resuloğlu Ç (2011) The Tunalı Hilmi Avenue, 1950s-1980s: the formation of a publıc place in Ankara. A Thesis Submitted To The Graduate School Of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University Unpuplished Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara.
28. Sakıcı Ç (2014) The psychological contributions of natural site experiences in Kastamonu, Turkey. Anthropologist, 18(3):991-1004.
29. Sakıcı Ç (2020) Seating area preferences: a case of Kastamonu city park in Kastamonu. The Journal of International Social Research, 13(73): 509-516.
30. Sakıcı Ç (2023) Kastamonu Cevizli Parkın değişiminin terapik açısından incelenmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 19(1):21-42.
31. Sharif AA (2022) Towards a relational approach for understanding the multiplicity of sitting activities. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research.
32. Spooner D (2014) Enhancing campus sustainability through sites and socially equitable design. Planning for Higher Education Journal, 42(4):30-45.
33. Swart T, Molenbroek J, Langeveld L, Van Brederode M, Daams BJ (2009) Outdoor seating design to facilitate social ınteraction among older adults. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 17(4):4-27.
34. Tırnakçı A (2020) Kentsel peyzaj tasarımı açısından tarihi kayseri kent meydanının (Cumhuriyet Meydanının) irdelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 4(2), 314-332.
35. Tsitoura M, Tsoutsos T, Daras T (2014) Evaluation of comfort conditions in urban open spaces: application in the island of Crete. Energy Conversion and Management, 86: 250- 258.
36. URL- 1, https://www.cankaya.bel.tr/m/pages/291/KUGULU-PARK/ Erişim Tarihi: 11.10.2023.
37. Woolley H (2003) Urban Open Spaces. Spon Press, London, 208s.