Yabancı Otlar Doğal Bitki Örtüsü Olarak: Erozyon Kontrolü ve Toprak Koruma Açısından Bir Değerlendirme

Öz

Toprak erozyonu, tarımsal üretkenliği sınırlayan, ekosistem hizmetlerini zayıflatan ve küresel gıda güvenliğini tehdit eden başlıca bozunum süreçlerinden biridir. Bitki örtüsünün erozyon önlenmesindeki kritik rolü iyi bilinmekle birlikte, tarımsal sistemlerde genellikle zararlı olarak değerlendirilen yabancı otların bu süreçteki işlevleri büyük ölçüde göz ardı edilmektedir. Bu çalışma, mevcut literatür ışığında yabancı otların ekolojik özelliklerini ve su ile rüzgâr erozyonunu azaltmadaki rollerini kapsamlı biçimde değerlendirmektedir. Bulgular, yabancı otların hızlı çimlenme yetenekleri, yüksek toprak örtüsü oluşturma kapasiteleri ve farklı kök sistemi morfolojileri sayesinde özellikle nadas ve hasat sonrası dönemlerde çıplak toprak yüzeylerini kısa sürede kaplayabildiğini göstermektedir. Toprak yüzeyinde oluşan bu bitki örtüsü, yağmur damlası etkisini azaltmakta, yüzey akışını yavaşlatmakta ve sediment taşınımını önemli ölçüde sınırlandırmaktadır. Ayrıca yabancı ot biyokütlesi, kök kalıntıları ve kök eksudatları yoluyla toprağa sağlanan organik madde girdileri mikrobiyal aktiviteyi ve agregat stabilitesini artırarak toprak yapısını güçlendirmekte ve su tutma kapasitesini iyileştirmektedir. Ancak yabancı otların, kültür bitkileriyle rekabeti, allelopatik etkiler ve bazı türlerin istilacı özellik göstermesi gibi faktörler tarımsal üretim açısından önemli riskler oluşturabilmektedir. Bu nedenle, yabancı otların tamamen ortadan kaldırılması yerine; tür kompozisyonu ve yoğunluk temelli değerlendirmelere dayanan kontrollü yabancı ot yönetimi stratejileri daha dengeli ve sürdürülebilir bir yaklaşım olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Yabancı otların ekosistem hizmetleri perspektifinden yeniden değerlendirilmesi, toprak erozyonunun azaltılmasını ve iklim değişikliğine dayanıklı, toprak sağlığı odaklı tarım sistemlerinin geliştirilmesini önemli katkılar sunma potansiyeline sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Erozyon
• Toprak kalitesi
• Sürdürülebiilir tarım
• Kontrollü yabancı ot yönetimi

Weeds as Natural Vegetation: An Evaluation for Erosion Control and Soil Conservation

Öz

Soil erosion is one of the main degradation processes that limits agricultural productivity, weakens ecosystem services, and threatens global food security. Although the critical role of vegetation in preventing erosion is well known, the functions of weeds, which are generally considered harmful in agricultural systems, are largely overlooked in this process. This study comprehensively evaluates the ecological characteristics of weeds and their roles in reducing water and wind erosion in light of the existing literature. Findings indicate that due to their rapid germination abilities, high soil cover capacity, and diverse root system morphologies, weeds can quickly cover bare soil surfaces, especially during fallow and post-harvest periods. This vegetation cover formed on the soil surface reduces the impact of raindrops, slows surface runoff, and significantly limits sediment transport. Furthermore, organic matter inputs provided to the soil through weed biomass, root residues, and root exudates enhance microbial activity and aggregate stability, thereby strengthening soil structure and improving water retention capacity. However, factors such as competition of weeds with crop plants, allelopathic effects, and the invasive characteristics of some species can pose significant risks to agricultural production. Therefore, instead of completely eradicating weeds, controlled weed management strategies based on species composition and density assessments stand out as a more balanced and sustainable approach. Reconceptualizing weeds from an ecosystem services perspective holds considerable potential to make significant contributions to reducing soil erosion and developing climate-resilient, soil health-oriented agricultural systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Erosion
• Soil quality
• Sustainable agriculture
• Integrated weed management

Kaynakça

1. Abdollahi, L., Munkholm, L.J., & Garbout, A. (2014). Tillage system and cover crop effects on soil quality: II. Pore characteristics. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 78 (1), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2013.07.0302
2. Acir, N., & Günal, H. (2019). Örtücü bitkilerin toprak kalitesine etkileri. ISPEC International Conference on Agriculture, Animal Science and Rural Development-III, 20-22 Aralık, Van, ss. 201-213.
3. Alp, V. (2025). Modelling of soil quality in Solhan Plain of Bingöl by ordinary kriging method. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Animal Sciences, 5(2), 92–104. https://izlik.org/JA76PY49AP
4. Amundson, R., Berhe, A.A., Hopmans, J.W., Olson, C., Sztein, A. E., & Sparks, D.L. (2015). Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science, 348 (6235), 1261071-1-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261071
5. Andreasen, C., Streibig, J.C., & Haas, H. (1991). Soil properties affecting the weed distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Research, 31, 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1991.tb01757.x
6. Borrelli, P., Robinson, D.A., Fleischer, L.R., Lugato, E., Ballabio, C., Alewell, C., & Panagos, P. (2017). An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications, 8(1), 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467‐017‐02142‐7
7. Borrelli, P., Robinson, D.A., Panagos, P., Lugato, E., Yang, J.E., Alewell, C., & Ballabio, C. (2020). Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015-2070). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(36), 21994-22001. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001403117
8. Budak, M. (2012). Tuzlu alkali toprakların oluşumu, sınıflandırılması ve klasik toprak etüd ve jeoistatistik yöntemlerle haritalanması (Doktora Tezi). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Anabilim Dalı, Tokat.

9. Cerdà, A., Rodrigo-Comino, J., Giménez-Morera, A., & Keesstra, S.D. (2021). Weed cover controls soil and water losses in rainfed olive groves in Sierra de Enguera, eastern Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Environmental Management, 290, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112516
10. Clement, T., Bielders, C.L., Degré, A., Manssens, G., Foucart, G., Pigeon, O., & Huyghebaert, B. (2025). Suitability of Strip‐tillage and undersowing in maize crops to control runoff, soil erosion and herbicide loss: field trials and modelling. Hydrological Processes, 39(7), e70170. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70170
11. Çelik, İ., Günal, H., Acir, N., Barut, Z.B., & Budak, M. (2021). Soil quality assessment to compare tillage systems in Cukurova Plain, Turkey. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 78 (1), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104892
12. De Baets, S., Poesen, J., Gyssels, G., & Knapen, A. (2006). Effects of grass roots on the erodibility of topsoils during concentrated flow. Geomorphology, 76(1–2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.10.002
13. De Baets, S., Poesen, J., Knapen, A., Barberá, G.G., & Navarro, J.A. (2007). Root characteristics of representative Mediterranean plant species and their erosion-reducing potential during concentrated runoff. Plant and Soil, 294(1), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9244-2
14. Diekmann, M. (2003). Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology—a review. Basic Appl Ecol 4, 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00185
15. Erşahin, S. (2001). Toprak Amenajmanı. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No. 56, Ders. Notları Serisi: 21. Tokat.
16. Erviö, R., Hyvärinen, S., Erviö, L.R., & Salonen, J. (1994). Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agricultural and Food Science, 3(5), 497-504.https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.72711
17. Ewald, J., Hennekens, S., Conrad, S., Wohlgemuth, T., Jansen, F., Jenssen, M., Cornelis, J., Michiels, H.G., Kayser, J., Chytry, M., Gégout, J.C., Breuer, M., Abs, C., Walentowski, H., Starlinger, F., & Godefroid, S. (2013). Spatial and temporal patterns of Ellenberg nutrient values in forests of Germany and adjacent regions-a survey based on phytosociological databases. Tuexenia, 33 (1), 93-109.
18. Fredan, A., & Mohammed, A.A. (2011). Nitrogen fixing legumes in the plant communities. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 7, 166- 172. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2011.166.172
19. Fryrear, D.W., Chen, W., & Lester, C. (2001). Revised wind erosion equation. Annals of Arid Zone, 40(3), 265-279.
20. Gerland, P., Raftery, A.E., Ševčíková, H., Li, N., Gu, D., Spoorenberg, T., & Wilmoth, J. (2014). World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science, 346(6206), 234-237.https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1257469
21. Glenn, E.P., Brown, J.J., & Blumwald, E. (1999). Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 18(2), 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689991309207
22. Gutknecht, J., Journey, A., Peterson, H., Blair, H., & Cates, A. (2023). Cover crop management practices to promote soil health and climate adaptation: rappling with varied success from farmer and researcher observations. Journal of Environmental Quality, 52(3), 448-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20383
23. Günal, H., Korucu, T., Birkas, M., Özgöz, E., & Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, R. (2015). Threats to sustainability of soil functions in Central and Southeast Europe. Sustainability, 7(2), 2161-2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7022161
24. Gyssels, G., & Poesen, J. (2003). The importance of plant root characteristics in controlling concentrated flow erosion rates. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 28(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.447
25. Gyssels, G., Poesen, J., Bochet, E., & Li, Y. (2005). Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Progress in Physical Geography, 29(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309133305pp443ra
26. Koç, E. (2025a). Saksıda yetiştirilen süs bitkilerinde yabancı otların tespiti: Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Fidanlığı. Ispec Journal of Science Institute, 4(2), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17978683
27. Koç, E. (2025b). The effects of weeds on biodiversity: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Agriculture, 8(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.46876/ja.1811934
28. Lal, R. (2005). Soil erosion and carbon dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research, 81(2), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.09.002
29. Lal, R. (2014). Soil conservation and ecosystem services. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 2(3), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-6339(15)30021-6
30. Li, Y., Li, Z., Cui, S., Jagadamma, S., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: a global meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research, 194, 104292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.06.009
31. Liebman, M., Mohler, C.L., & Staver, C.P. (2001). Ecological management of agricultural weeds. Cambridge University Press. İngiltere: Cambridge, ISBN:0-521-56068-3.532 p.
32. Liu, Y.F., Meng, L.C., Huang, Z., Shi, Z.H., & Wu, G.L. (2022). Contribution of fine roots mechanical property of Poaceae grasses to soil erosion resistance on the Loess Plateau. Geoderma, 426, 116122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116122
33. Liu, R., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Hu, B., Shi, X., & Rennenberg, H. (2024). Groundcover improves nutrition and growth of citrus trees and reduces water runoff, soil erosion and nutrient loss on sloping farmland. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, 1489693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1489693
34. Lv, J., Wang, W., Dai, T., Liu, B., & Liu, G. (2024). Experimental study on the effect of soil reinforcement and slip resistance on shallow slopes by herbaceous plant root system. Sustainability, 16(8), 3475. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083475
35. Medinski, T. (2007). Soil chemical and physical properties and their influence on the plant species richness of arid South-West Africa (Master’s Thesis). University of Stellenbosch, Department of Conservation Ecology, South Africa.
36. Mohler, C.L. (1993). A model of the effects of tillage on emergence of weed seedlings. Ecological Applications, 3(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941792
37. Montgomery, D.R. (2007). Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(33), 13268–13272. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611508104
38. Mulla, D.J., & McBratney, A.B. (2001). Soil Spatial Variability. pp. 343-374. In A.W. Warrick (ed.). Soil Physics Companion. CRC Press. USA.
39. Murphy, S.D., Clements, D.R., Belaoussoff, S., Kevan, P.G., & Swanton, C.J. (2006). Promotion of weed species diversity and reduction of weed seedbanks with conservation tillage and crop rotation. Weed Science, 54(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-125R1.1
40. Navas, M.L. (2012). Trait-based approaches to unravelling the assembly of weed communities and their impact on agro-ecosystem functioning. Weed Research, 52(6), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13653180.2012.00941.x
41. Nordmeyer, H., & Niemann, P. (1992). Möglichkeiten der gezielten Teilflächenbehandlung mit Herbiziden auf der Grundlage von Unkrautverteilung und Bodenvariabilität. Z. Pflkrankh. Pflschutz Sonderheft, 13, 539-547.
42. Nouri, A., Youssef, F., Basaran, M., Lee, J., Saxton, A.M., & Erpul, G. (2018). The effect of fallow tillage management on aeolian soil losses in semiarid Central Anatolia, Turkey. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 1(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.2134/age2018.07.0019
43. Önen, H., Akdeniz, M., Farooq, S., Hussain, M., & Özaslan, C. (2018). Weed flora of citrus orchards and factors affecting its distribution in western Mediterranean region of Turkey. Planta Daninha, 36, e018172126. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582018360100036
44. Önen, H. (2020). Endüstriyel kenevirde hastalık, zararlı ve yabancı ot mücadelesi. Harf Yayınları, Büyük Reşitpaşa Cad. Yümni İş merkezi No: 22/2, Fatih/ İstanbul, p 92. ISBN: 978-975-8738-45-8.
45. Özer, Z., Kadıoğlu, İ., Önen, H., & Tursun, N. (2001). Herboloji (yabancı ot bilimi). Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 20, Kitap Seri No: 10, Tokat.
46. Palm, C., Blanco-Canqui, H., DeClerck, F., Gatere, L., & Grace, P. (2014). Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 187, 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.010
47. Pätzold, S., Hbirkou, C., Dicke, D., Gerhards, R., & Welp, G. (2020). Linking weed patterns with soil properties: a long-term case study. Precision Agriculture, 21(3), 569-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09682-6
48. Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., & Blair, R. (1995). Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science, 267(5201), 1117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5201.1117
49. Ponette, Q., Bispo, A., Brethes, A., Dupouey, J.L., Feix, I., Gégout, J.C., & Ranger, J. (2014). Fertility indicators in temperate forest soils: issues, approaches and prospects. Revue Forestière Française, 66(5), 501-515.
50. Rajbanshi, J., Das, S., & Paul, R. (2023). Quantification of the effects of conservation practices on surface runoff and soil erosion in croplands and their trade-off: a meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 864, 161015.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161015
51. Reubens, B., Poesen, J., Danjon, F., Geudens, G., & Muys, B. (2007). The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture. Earth-Science Reviews, 89(1–2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-007-0132-4
52. Sırrı, M. (2022). Toprak kalitesinin yabancı ot türleri ve dağılımlarına etkisi. (Edt. Günal, H. ve Budak, M.). Toprak Kalitesi ve Değerlendirilmesi, Ankara, 191-222.
53. Sırrı, M., & Günal, H. (2022). Örtücü Bitkilerin Toprak Kalitesi ve Yabancı Otlara Etkileri. (Edt. Günal, H. ve Budak, M.). Toprak Kalitesi ve Değerlendirilmesi, Ankara, 128-148.
54. Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004). A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research, 79(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008
55. Smith, P., Poch, R.M., Lobb, D.A., Bhattacharyya, R., Alloush, G., Eudoxie, G.D., & Hallett, P. (2024). Status of the World's Soils. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 49 (1), 73-104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-030323-075629
56. Soane, B.D., Ball, B.C., Arvidsson, J., Basch, G., Moreno, F., & Roger-Estrade, J. (2012) Notill in northern, western and south-western Europe: a review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment. Soil and Tillage Research, 118, 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.10.015
57. Surat, H., & Eminağaoğlu, Ö. (2018). Determination of the aesthetical and functional use of certain natural plants in Hatila Valley National Park in landscape architecture. International Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science, 8(1), 113-134. http://u-o-i.org/1.01/ijees/43480161
58. Şahin, U., & Özcan, M. (2020). Effect of different soil conservation methods and planting with four-wing salt bush (Atriplex canescens) on soil erosion in a semi-arid region of Turkey. Bosque, 41(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002020000300253
59. Tik, R., Gürbüz, R., & Kaya, T. (2025). Peyzaj alanlarında yabancı otların etkili yönetimi ve sürdürülebilirlik. In ICSAS 1st International Conference on Architecture, Landscape Architecture and Urban. ISBN: 978-625-5962-41-6.
60. Yousaf, A., Khalid, N., Aqeel, M., Rizvi, Z.F., Alhaithloul, H.A., Sarfraz, W., Mutairi, K.A., Albishi, T., Alamri, S., Hashem, M., Noman, A., & Qari, S.H. (2022). Assessment of composition and spatial dynamics of weed communities in agroecosystem under varying edaphic factors. PloS one, 17(5), e0266778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266778