Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi Kullanılarak Bitkisel Tasarımda Estetik Faktörlere Yönelik Etkili Bir Nicel Modelin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bitkiler, peyzaj mimarlığı disiplininde yaygın olarak kullanılan ve mekân algısının oluşumuna katkı sağlayan canlı materyallerdir. Bu çalışma, açık yeşil alanlarda bitkisel tasarımda renk, form, doku ve ölçü gibi estetik öğeleri dikkate alarak mekânsal algının güçlendirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, Bursa Teknik Üniversitesi (BTÜ) Mimar Sinan Yerleşkesi’nde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında estetik açıdan önemli kabul edilen temel ölçütler (renk, form, doku ve ölçü) ile bu ölçütlere bağlı alt ölçütler sınıflandırılmıştır. Oluşturulan ölçüt grupları, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden biri olan Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) kullanılarak değerlendirilmiş ve önceliklendirilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, bitkisel tasarımda ölçü kriterinin en önemli ana kriter olduğunu; alt kriterler arasında ise ince dokulu bitkisel materyallerin en yüksek öncelik değerine sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuçlar, eğitim ve rekreasyonel etkinlikleri destekleyen açık yeşil alanların oluşturulmasında ve bitkisel tasarım süreçlerinde katılımcı bir yönetim anlayışının benimsenmesinde yol gösterici niteliktedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Estetik
• Form
• Bitkisel Tasarım
• Ölçü
• Doku

Assessment of an Effective Quantitative Model for Aesthetic Factors in Planting Design Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method

Öz

Plants are living materials that are widely used in the discipline of landscape architecture and help the perception of spaces. This study aims to enhance spatial perception in open green spaces by considering aesthetic elements such as color, form, texture, and size in planting design. The study is conducted at Bursa Technical University (BTU) Mimar Sinan Campus. The main criteria such as color, form, texture, and size, which are considered aesthetically important, and the sub-criteria belonging to these criteria, are classified within the scope of the study. The classified criteria groups are evaluated and ranked using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method. Results indicate that size is the most critical factor in planting design, with fine-textured materials ranking highest among sub-criteria. The findings offer guidance for creating open green spaces that support educational and recreational activities while adopting a participatory management approach to planting design.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aesthetics
• Form
• Planting design
• Size
• Texture

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy, O., & Erken, K. (2022). The use of plant species that grow naturally in the Marmara flora in landscape architecture "an example of a floral design project with 12 months of flowers’’. Ağaç ve Orman, 3(1), 8-19. https://izlik.org/JA53ZP96RZ
2. Alp, Ş., Bilgili, B.C., Çorbacı, Ö.L., & Karaman, K. (2010). Examination of Functionality of Brich (Betula Pendula Roth.) In Line With Plantation Design Principles. Derim, 27(2), 58-70. https://izlik.org/JA98FH96EW
3. Behe, B., Hardy, J., Barton, S., Brooker, J., Fernandez, T., Hall, C., & Schutzki, R. (2005). Landscape plant material, size, and design sophistication increase perceived home value. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 23(3), 127-133. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-23.3.127
4. Carli, R., Dotoli, M., & Pellegrino, R. (2018). Multi-criteria decision-making for sustainable metropolitan cities assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 226, 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.075
5. Eren, E.T., & Var, M. (2016). Taxa used in planting design in parks: the case of Trabzon City centre. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 200-213. https://doi.org/10.17474/acuofd.71993
6. Eroğlu, E., Kesim, G.A., & Müderrisoğlu, H. (2005). Determination of plants in open and green areas in Düzce and evaluation of these plants according to some planting design principles. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(03), 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000583
7. Gao, J., Liu, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). Application of color in innovative digital landscape design. In 2020 International Conference on Innovation Design and Digital Technology (ICIDDT) (pp. 312-316). IEEE. https://doi.org/110.1109/ICIDDT52279.2020.00063
8. Gülgün, B., Yazici, K., Güldiken, Ö., & Köse, H. (2013). Planting design in indoor shopping centers. Ziraat Mühendisliği, (360), 40-45. https://izlik.org/JA29ZL72LB

9. Harries, B., Chalmin-Pui, L.S., Gatersleben, B., Griffiths, A., & Ratcliffe, E. (2024). Identifying features within a garden linked to emotional reactions and perceived restoration. Cities & Health, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2300235
10. Kil, S.H., Lee, D.K., Kim, J.H., Li, M.H., & Newman, G. (2016). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process to establish weighted values for evaluating the stability of slope revegetation based on hydroseeding applications in South Korea. Sustainability, 8(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010058
11. Kösa, S., & Atik, M. (2013). Colour and form in planting design; preferences of landscape architecture students in the use of Turkish Sweetgum (Liquidambar orientalis) and oriental plane (Platanus orientalis). Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 13-24. https://izlik.org/JA35FF54DC
12. Kösa, S., & Aksöğüt, Ş. (2020). Evaluation of plants compositions in different using areas according to the principles of planting design. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.684508
13. Kuhns, M.R., & Rupp, L. (2000). Selecting and planting landscape trees (Utah State University Extension General Technical Report NR-460).
14. Ma, B., Hauer, R.J., & Xu, C. (2020). Effects of design proportion and distribution of color in urban and suburban green space planning to visual aesthetics quality. Forests, 11(3), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11030278
15. Meral, A., Başaran, N., Ak, K., & Eroğlu, E. (2018). Examination of Forms of Urban Street Trees in the Context of Aesthetic Perception: The Case of Genç Street in Central Bingöl. In ISUEP2018 Uluslararası Kentleşme ve Çevre Sorunları Sempozyumu: Değişim/Dönüşüm/Özgünlük, 28-30 June.
16. Nemutlu, F.E. (2014). Planting design in the urban protection area: the example of Çanakkale (Turkey). ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 91-99. https://izlik.org/JA94DL65RS
17. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
18. Saaty, T.L. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications.
19. Saaty, T.L., & Vargas, L.G. (2001). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1
20. Sarı, D., & Karaşah, B. (2018). A research on preferences of planting design elements, principles and approaches in landscape design applications. Megaron, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5505/MEGARON.2018.29981
21. Serpa, A., & Muhar, A. (1996). Effects of plant size, texture and color on spatial perception in public green areas—a cross-cultural study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00330-1
22. Shen, S., Yao, Y., & Li, C. (2022). Quantitative study on landscape colors of plant communities in urban parks based on natural color system and M‐S theory in Nanjing, China. Color Research & Application, 47(1), 152-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22713
23. Tsyganok, V.V., Kadenko, S.V., & Andriichuk, O.V. (2012). Significance of expert competence consideration in group decision making using AHP. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4785-4792. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657967
24. TUBIVES. (2004). Turkish Plants Data Service. http://194.27.225.161/yasin/tubives/index.php, Access Date: 18.03.2026.
25. Paraskevopoulou, A.T., Kamperi, E., Demiris, N., Economou, M., Theleritis, C., Kitsonas, M., & Papageorgiou, C. (2018). The impact of seasonal color change in planting on patients with psychotic disorders using biosensors. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 36, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.006
26. Perçin, S. (2006). An application of the integrated AHP‐PGP model in supplier selection. Measuring Business Excellence, 10(4), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040610719263
27. Pouya, S. (2019). Plant design approach in recreation areas, case of Malatya city. The Journal of Academic Social Science, (96), 162-184. https://doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.36728
28. Tandoğan, O., & Şişman, E.E. (2018). Public open space design and plant design for liveable winter cities. Megaron, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5505/MEGARON.2018.92668
29. Var, M. (2024). Sustainable Management of Urban Green Spaces. In K. Ince (Eds.), Landscape therapy in permanent housing after the earthquake (p.1-29). Ankara, Ankara; İKSAD Publishing House.
30. Zhang, L., Dempsey, N., & Cameron, R. (2023). Flowers–sunshine for the soul! How does floral color influence preference, feelings of relaxation and positive up-lift?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 79, 127795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127795
31. Zhang, L., Dempsey, N., & Cameron, R. (2024). ‘Blossom Buddies’− How do flower color combinations affect emotional response and influence therapeutic landscape design?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 248, 105099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105099