Assessing effects of the quality of urban green spaces on people`s health and physical activity

Öz

The importance of urban green spaces, which is accepted as an important indicator of the quality of life in cities, is increasing day by day along with urbanization. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the quality of urban green spaces and people’s physical activity levels and health. The data of this study were collected in face-to-face interviews with 394 users who actively use urban green spaces for physical activity on April 1 to May 15, 2016 in seven different urban green spaces in Aydın city center. While the socio-economic status of participants was statistically controlled, the relationships between the quality of urban green spaces and people`s physical activity levels, stress levels, mental and physical health were examined. In the regression analysis, a positive relationship between people` s physical activity levels and close distance to urban green space from home was found. On the other hand, there were positive relationships between people`s physical activities and the maintenance and cleanliness of the urban green spaces. Whereas positive relationships were found between largeness and cleanliness of urban green spaces and less stress. In addition, a positive relationship was found between open and visible urban green spaces and better physical health. It was also found that the duration of physical activity was positively related to better physical health. The results of this study suggest that urban green spaces should be close to people`s homes in terms of their physical activities and health. Certain quality of urban green spaces would help people to be more physically active and healthier in terms of mental and physical health.    

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Urban green spaces,Physical activity,Green space quality,Stress,Mental and physical health

Kentsel yeşil alanların kalitesinin insan sağlığı ve fiziksel aktivitesi üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi

Öz

Kentlerde yaşam kalitesinin önemli bir göstergesi olarak kabul edilen kentsel yeşil alanların önemi şehirleşmeyle birlikte her geçen gün artmaktadır. Bu sebeple, bu çalışmanın amacı kentsel yeşil alanların kalitesi ile insanların fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ve sağlıkları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Bu çalışmanın verileri, Aydın kent merkezinde bulunan yedi farklı kentsel yeşil alanda, 1 Nisan-15 Mayıs 2016 tarihlerinde kentsel yeşil alanları fiziksel aktivite için aktif olarak kullanan 394 kullanıcıyla yüz yüze bireysel görüşmeler yapılarak toplanmıştır. Katılımcıların sosyo-ekonomik durumları istatistiki olarak kontrol edilerek çoklu regresyon analiz yöntemi ile kentsel yeşil alanların kalitesi ile insanların fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ve stres seviyeleri, ruh ve beden sağlıkları arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Çoklu regresyon analizi sonucunda insanların fiziksel aktiviteleri ile yeşil alanların eve yakınlığı arasında pozitif anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Diğer taraftan, insanların fiziksel aktiviteleri ile yeşil alanların bakımlı ve temiz olması arasında pozitif anlamlı ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Yeşil alanların büyüklüğü ve temizliğinin ise daha az stres ile, yeşil alanların açık ve görünür olmasının da daha iyi fiziksel sağlıkla pozitif anlamlı ilişkili olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca fiziksel aktivite süresinin daha iyi fiziksel sağlık ile pozitif anlamlı ilişkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu araştırmanın sonuçları yeşil alanların insanların fiziksel aktiviteleri ve sağlıkları açısından evlerine yakın mesafelerde olması gerektiğini önermektedir. Belirli kalitedeki kentsel yeşil alanların insanların fiziksel olarak daha aktif, ruh ve beden sağlığı açısından da daha sağlıklı olmalarına katkı yapacağını göstermektedir    

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kentsel yeşil alanlar,fiziksel aktivite,yeşil alan kalitesi,stres,ruh ve beden sağlığı

Kaynakça

1. Akpınar, A. (2014). Kullanıcıların kentsel yeşil yolları kullanım sebepleri, algıları ve tercihlerinin Aydın-Koşuyolu örneğinde incelenmesi (Assessing the users` perceptions, preferences, and reasons for use of urban greenway in Aydın-Koşuyolu province). Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 64(2), 41-55. doi:10.17099/jffiu.31281
2. Akpınar, A. (2016a). How is quality of urban green spaces associated with physical activity and health? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 76–83.
3. Akpınar, A. (2016b). Factors influencing the use of urban greenways: A case study of Aydın, Turkey. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 123–131.
4. Akpınar, A., & Cankurt, M. (2017). How are characteristics of urban green space related to levels of physical activity: Examining the links. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(8), 1091–1101.
5. Amorim, T. C., Azevedo, M. R., & Hallal, P. C. (2010). Physical activity levels according to physical and social environmental factors in a sample of adults livingin South Brazil. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7(Suppl 2), S204-S212.
6. Ball, K., Bauman, A., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2001). Perceived Environmental Aesthetics and Convenience and Company Are Associated with Walking for Exercise among Australian Adults. Preventive Medicine, 33, 434–440.
7. Bancroft, C., Joshi, S., Rundle, A., Hutson, M., Chong, C., & Weiss, C. C. (2015). Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.034
8. Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2010). What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 3947–3955.

9. Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A., & Cohen, D. (2005). The Significance of Parks to Physical Activity and Public Health: A Conceptual Model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2), 159 –168.
10. Björk, J., Albin, M., Grahn, P., Jacobsson, H., Ardö, J., Wadbro, J., . . . Skärbäck, E. (2008). Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(e2).
11. Boone-Heinonen, J., Casanova, K., Richardson, A., & Gordon-Larsen, P. (2010). Where can they play? Outdoor spaces and physical activity among adolescents in U.S. urbanized areas. Prev Med., 51(3-4), 295–298.
12. Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10(456).
13. Brown, B., & Bentley, D. L. (1993). Residential burglars judge risk: the role of territoriality. J Environ Psychol, 13, 51– 61.
14. Cohen, D. A., Ashwood, J. S., Scott, M. M., Overton, A., Evenson, K. R., Staten, L. K., . . . Catellier, D. (2006). Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics, 118, e1381–e1389.
15. Cohen, D., McKenzie, T., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., Golinelli, D., & Lurie, N. (2007). Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 509–514.
16. Dadvand, P., Bartoll, X., Basagaña, X., Dalmau-Bueno, A., Martinez, D., Ambros, A., . . . Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2016). Green spaces and General Health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment International, 91, 161-167.
17. de Jong, K., Albin, M., Skarback, E., Grahn, P., Wadbro, J., Merlo, J., & Bjork, J. (2011). Area-aggregated assessments of perceived environmental attributes may overcome single-source bias in studies of green environments and health: Results from a cross-sectional survey in southern Sweden. Environmental Health, 10(4).
18. de Vries, S., van Dillen, S. M., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2013). Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 26-33.
19. Duncan, M., & Mummery, K. (2005). Psychosocial and environmental factors associated with physical activity among city dwellers in regional Queensland. Preventive Medicine, 40, 363–372.
20. Evenson, K. R., Birnbaum, A. S., Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Sallis, J. F., Voorhees, C. C., Ring, K., & Elder, J. P. (2006). Girls’ perception of physical environmental factors and transportation: Reliability and association with physical activity and active transport to school. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 3(28).
21. Ferré, M. B., Guitart, A. O., & Ferret, M. P. (2006). Children and playgrounds in Mediterranean cities. Children's Geographies, 4(2), 173-183.
22. Foster, C., Hillsdon, M., & Thorogood, M. (2004). Environmental perceptions and walking in English adults. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58, 924–928.
23. Francis, J., Wood, L., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2012). Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1570-1577.
24. Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K. N., Lange, A., & Donovan, R. (2005). Increasing walking. How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2), 169–176.
25. Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Green, 2, 1-18.
26. Hallal, P. C., Andersen, L., Bull, F., Guthold, R., Haskell, W., & Ekelund, U. (2012). Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls,and prospects. Lancet, 380, 247–57.
27. Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and Health. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 35, 207–28.
28. Hillsdon, M., Panter, J., Foster, C., & Jones, A. (2006). The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health, 120(12), 1127-32.
29. İmar ve Şehircilik Dairesi Başkanlığı. (2013). Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi Nazım İmar Planı. Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
30. Jones, A., Hillsdon, M., & Coombes, E. (2009). Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation. Preventive Medicine, 49, 500–505.
31. Kabisch, N., Qureshi, S., & Haase, D. (2015). Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 25–34.
32. Kaczynski, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity: A review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure Science: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(4), 315–354.
33. Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., & Saelens, B. E. (2008). Association of park size, distance and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1451–1456.
34. Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., Smale, B. J., & Havitz, M. E. (2009). Association of Parkland Proximity with Neighborhood and Park-based Physical Activity: Variations by Gender and Age. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(2), 174-191.
35. Koohsari, M. J., Mavoa, S., Villanueva, K., Sugiyama, T., Badland, H., Kaczynski, A., . . . Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health & Place, 33, 75–82.
36. Lachowycz, K., & Jones, A. P. (2011). Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. obesity reviews, 12, e183–e189.
37. LaGrange, R., Ferraro, K., & Supancic, M. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: role of social and physical incivilities. J Res Crime Delinquency, 29, 311–34.
38. Lee, A. C., & Maheswaran, R. (2010). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of Public Health, 1-11.
39. Lee, I.-M., Shiroma, E., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S., & Katzmarzyk, P. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet, 380(9838), 219–229.
40. Maas, J., Verheij, R., Spreeuwenberg, P., & Groenewegen, P. (2008). Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health, 8, 206-218.
41. Mackay, G. J., & Neill, J. T. (2010). The effect of “green exercise” on state anxiety and the role of exercise duration, intensity, and greenness: A quasi-experimental study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 238-245.
42. McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & Place, 16, 712–726.
43. Mowen, A., Orsega-Smith, E., Payne, L., Ainsworth, B., & Godbey, G. (2007). The role of park proximity and social support in shaping park visitation, physical activity, and perceived health among older adults. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 4, 167-179.
44. Nielsen, T. S., & Hansen, K. B. (2007). Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health & Place, 13, 839–850.
45. Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Kruize, H., Gidlow, C., Andrusaityte, S., Antó, J., Basagaña, X., . . . Grazuleviciene, R. (2014). Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): a study programme protocol. BMJ Open, 4.
46. Paquet, C., Orschulok, T. P., Coffee, N., Howard, N. J., Hugo, G., Taylor, A. W., . . . Daniel, M. (2013). Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health? Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 70–78.
47. Powell, K. E., Martin, L. M., & Chowdhury, P. P. (2003). Places to Walk: Convenience and Regular Physical Activity. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1519–1521.
48. Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Hine, R., Sellens, M., South, N., & Griffin, M. (2007). Green Exercise in the UK Countryside: Effects on Health and Psychological Well-Being, Implications for Policy and Planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 211-231.
49. Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2014). Türkiye Beslenme ve Sağlık Araştırması 2010: Beslenme Durumu ve Alışkanlıklarının Değerlendirilmesi Sonuç Raporu (Turkey Nutrition and Health Survey 2010: Status and Assessment of Nutritional Habits Final Report). Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Araştırmaları Genel Müdürlüğü, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü, Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi.
50. Sallis, J. F., Floyd, M. F., Rodríguez, D. A., & Saelens, B. E. (2012). The Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and CVD. Circulation, 125(5), 729–737.
51. Sallis, J. F., Owen, N., & Fisher, E. B. (2008). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Vismanath, Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 565-485). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., Toftager, M., & Stigsdotter, U. (2013). Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, 109–116.
53. Schipperijn, J., Ekholm, O., Stigsdotter, U. K., Toftager, M., Bentsen, P., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Factors influencing the use of green space: Results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 130-137.
54. Smith, S. (2013, April 08). Determining Sample Size: How to Ensure You Get the Correct Sample Size. Retrieved Nisan 10, 2014, from http://www.qualtrics.com/blog/determining-sample-size/
55. Stanners, D., & Bourdeau, P. (1995). The urban environment. In D. Stanners, & P. Bourdeau, Europe’s Environment: The Dobris Assessment (pp. 261–296). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
56. Sugiyama, T., Francis, J., Middleton, N. J., Owen, N., & Giles-Corti, B. (2010). Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1752-7.
57. Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B., & Owen, N. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking,social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 62(5), 1-6.
58. Tamosiunas, A., Grazuleviciene, R., Luksiene, D., Dedele, A., Reklaitiene, R., Baceviciene, M., . . . Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2014). Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environmental Health, 13(20).
59. Taylor, L. M., Leslie, E., Plotnikoff, R., Owen, N., & Spence, J. (2008). Associations of Perceived Community Environmental Attributes with Walking in a Population-Based Sample of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Ann. Behav. Med, 35, 170–178.
60. The Ministry of Health. (2014). Physical Activity Guidelines for Turkey. Ankara: The Ministry of Health of Turkey, Public Health Institution, Department of Obesity, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases.
61. Toftager, M., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Bentsen, P., Grønbæk, M., . . . Kamper-Jørgensen, F. (2011). Distance to green space and physical activity: a Danish national representative survey. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8, 741–749.
62. WHO. (2010). Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization.